Preben Randhol wrote:
Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/05/2002
(20:42) :
It's Dell's fault that the DSDT (a major part of ACPI) is broken. I'm
not sure whether it's Dell's or Intel's fault processor limits aren't
supported. It's definitely Dell's fault that Thermal and Fan cont
Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/05/2002
(20:42) :
>
> It's Dell's fault that the DSDT (a major part of ACPI) is broken. I'm
> not sure whether it's Dell's or Intel's fault processor limits aren't
> supported. It's definitely Dell's fault that Thermal and Fan controls
> aren't imp
Preben Randhol wrote:
> Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/05/2002
> (20:42) :
>
>>It's Dell's fault that the DSDT (a major part of ACPI) is broken. I'm
>>not sure whether it's Dell's or Intel's fault processor limits aren't
>>supported. It's definitely Dell's fault that Thermal an
Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/05/2002
(20:42) :
>
> It's Dell's fault that the DSDT (a major part of ACPI) is broken. I'm
> not sure whether it's Dell's or Intel's fault processor limits aren't
> supported. It's definitely Dell's fault that Thermal and Fan controls
> aren't im
> Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13/05/2002 (15:38)
:
> > From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > Woody is stable. And when released in some weeks it will be the new
> > > stable distribution and then security fixes will only be towards
woody.
> >
> > I think it'll be mor
Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13/05/2002 (15:38) :
> From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Woody is stable. And when released in some weeks it will be the new
> > stable distribution and then security fixes will only be towards woody.
>
> I think it'll be more than a few
> Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13/05/2002 (15:38)
:
> > From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > Woody is stable. And when released in some weeks it will be the new
> > > stable distribution and then security fixes will only be towards
woody.
> >
> > I think it'll be mo
Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13/05/2002 (15:38) :
> From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Woody is stable. And when released in some weeks it will be the new
> > stable distribution and then security fixes will only be towards woody.
>
> I think it'll be more than a fe
From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Woody is stable. And when released in some weeks it will be the new
> stable distribution and then security fixes will only be towards woody.
I think it'll be more than a few weeks - it has to go to "frozen" first.
> I have Dell Inspirion 2500 running
Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13/05/2002 (13:57) :
> * Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-05-13 07:22 -0400:
> > From: "Andre Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi Derek!
>
> > > installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
> >
> > Why not? There's no good re
Andre Berger wrote:
>
>>>installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
>>
>>Why not? There's no good reason to avoid woody. Potato is way too old,
>>now.
>
> I'm a stability freak :)
You obviously belong on the Debian development team, since woody is
extremely stable. :-) Only
* Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-05-13 07:22 -0400:
> From: "Andre Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Derek!
> > installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
>
> Why not? There's no good reason to avoid woody. Potato is way too old,
> now.
I'm a stability freak :)
From: "Andre Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My friend has got this Dell Inspiron 2500, and I have some problems
> installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
Why not? There's no good reason to avoid woody. Potato is way too old,
now.
> 2.2.19 hangs at the initialization of
From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Woody is stable. And when released in some weeks it will be the new
> stable distribution and then security fixes will only be towards woody.
I think it'll be more than a few weeks - it has to go to "frozen" first.
> I have Dell Inspirion 2500 runnin
Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13/05/2002 (13:57) :
> * Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-05-13 07:22 -0400:
> > From: "Andre Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi Derek!
>
> > > installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
> >
> > Why not? There's no good r
Andre Berger wrote:
>
>>>installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
>>
>>Why not? There's no good reason to avoid woody. Potato is way too old,
>>now.
>
> I'm a stability freak :)
You obviously belong on the Debian development team, since woody is
extremely stable. :-) Onl
--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-05-13 07:22 -0400:
> From: "Andre Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Derek!
> > installing potato (don't want woody yet)
From: "Andre Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My friend has got this Dell Inspiron 2500, and I have some problems
> installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
Why not? There's no good reason to avoid woody. Potato is way too old,
now.
> 2.2.19 hangs at the initialization of
> > If you're interested in working with me on this, I'd suggest we keep trying
> > and report back to this list and acpi-devel with our results. We seem to be
> > at a pretty similar point.
> Yes, I thought the same. However, for the next weeks, I'm pretty (I start my
> last exams tomorrow).
+ bu
> I have no trouble with X. ALSA was simple once I finally realized that the
> .deb package wasn't creating a required link from /etc/modutils/alsa ->
> /etc/alsa/modutil/0.9. APM is definitely toast. PCMCIA works fine for me,
> but that seems fairly dependent on the cards you're using.
There are
> > If you're interested in working with me on this, I'd suggest we keep trying
> > and report back to this list and acpi-devel with our results. We seem to be
> > at a pretty similar point.
> Yes, I thought the same. However, for the next weeks, I'm pretty (I start my
> last exams tomorrow).
+ b
> I have no trouble with X. ALSA was simple once I finally realized that the
> .deb package wasn't creating a required link from /etc/modutils/alsa ->
> /etc/alsa/modutil/0.9. APM is definitely toast. PCMCIA works fine for me,
> but that seems fairly dependent on the cards you're using.
There ar
From: "Baptiste Malguy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> 1) My Inspiron 2500:
>
>
> I have to say that even if now it works pretty well with most of the
> functionnalities ready, it has not always been true.
> Many trouble with ALSA, X, APM, ACPI, PCMCIA ...
I have no trouble with X.
From: "Baptiste Malguy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> 1) My Inspiron 2500:
>
>
> I have to say that even if now it works pretty well with most of the
> functionnalities ready, it has not always been true.
> Many trouble with ALSA, X, APM, ACPI, PCMCIA ...
I have no trouble with X.
I think 2.4.X PCI support is just jacked. I went and got 2.2.20,
setup the kernel the way I want it, installed the pcmcia-cs package,
fixed the module naming problem (wavelan_cs vs orinoco_cs) rebooted
and boop beep my card is regonized. I haven't gotten a chance to
configure it yet since I'm at
I think 2.4.X PCI support is just jacked. I went and got 2.2.20,
setup the kernel the way I want it, installed the pcmcia-cs package,
fixed the module naming problem (wavelan_cs vs orinoco_cs) rebooted
and boop beep my card is regonized. I haven't gotten a chance to
configure it yet since I'm at
sageFool wrote:
Hi, so I compiled the kernel with the PCMCIA/CARDBUS support turned on.
WHen I run ./test_setup I get:
debian:/usr/src/pcmcia-cs-3.1.31/debug-tools# ./test_setup
Current kernel: 2.4.17 #6 Tue Feb 19 07:50:28 PST 2002
/lib/modules/2.4.17/pcmcia/pcmcia_core.o not found.
The P
sageFool wrote:
> Hi, so I compiled the kernel with the PCMCIA/CARDBUS support turned on.
>
> WHen I run ./test_setup I get:
>
> debian:/usr/src/pcmcia-cs-3.1.31/debug-tools# ./test_setup
> Current kernel: 2.4.17 #6 Tue Feb 19 07:50:28 PST 2002
> /lib/modules/2.4.17/pcmcia/pcmcia_core.o not fo
Hi, so I compiled the kernel with the PCMCIA/CARDBUS support turned on.
WHen I run ./test_setup I get:
debian:/usr/src/pcmcia-cs-3.1.31/debug-tools# ./test_setup
Current kernel: 2.4.17 #6 Tue Feb 19 07:50:28 PST 2002
/lib/modules/2.4.17/pcmcia/pcmcia_core.o not found.
The PCMCIA modules are no
Hi, so I compiled the kernel with the PCMCIA/CARDBUS support turned on.
WHen I run ./test_setup I get:
debian:/usr/src/pcmcia-cs-3.1.31/debug-tools# ./test_setup
Current kernel: 2.4.17 #6 Tue Feb 19 07:50:28 PST 2002
/lib/modules/2.4.17/pcmcia/pcmcia_core.o not found.
The PCMCIA modules are n
Hi!
I've just been working on the same problem ;)
And one of the things I figured out was that it was very important that the
pcmcia-cs package is to be found under /usr/src/modules/pcmcia-cs/ when you
compiles the kernel and the modules.
(in my place it was default put under /usr/src/pcmcia-cs
sageFool wrote:
I have a Inspiron 2500, with debian/unstable installed on it. I'm
running the 2.4.17 kernel (downloaded the source package and
recompiled a million times)
Me too, but I've only compiled about a thousand times :-)
I have PCMCIA support turned off in the kernel and am using
Hi!
I've just been working on the same problem ;)
And one of the things I figured out was that it was very important that the
pcmcia-cs package is to be found under /usr/src/modules/pcmcia-cs/ when you
compiles the kernel and the modules.
(in my place it was default put under /usr/src/pcmcia-c
sageFool wrote:
>
> I have a Inspiron 2500, with debian/unstable installed on it. I'm
> running the 2.4.17 kernel (downloaded the source package and
> recompiled a million times)
Me too, but I've only compiled about a thousand times :-)
> I have PCMCIA support turned off in the kernel and a
34 matches
Mail list logo
