Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2005-08-06 Thread H. Kerem Cevahir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, You should configure your alsa with "alsaconf". If you can't see your sound card in the list, that means your debian don't have necessary alsa drivers. Then, you should install new version of alsa drivers. You can download driver source tarball fr

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2005-08-06 Thread DNK
i have the described sound device but no sound is coming out of ma system now what can i do?

Subject: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2004-06-21 Thread yuancnalun
 

Subject: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2004-06-21 Thread yuancnalun
 

Re: (semi-solved): Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-27 Thread Oleg
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 09:38 am, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > that could be cause by your sound server settings, try increasing the > latency, also, have you installed all the ALSA utilities and alsa m odules > for sound programs? Latency of the sound server? I installed everything from the alsa

Re: (semi-solved): Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-27 Thread Oleg
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 09:38 am, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > that could be cause by your sound server settings, try increasing the > latency, also, have you installed all the ALSA utilities and alsa m odules > for sound programs? Latency of the sound server? I installed everything from the alsa

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-27 Thread Paul Hampson
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:09:02PM +, Nyk Tarr wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:47:03PM -0500, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > > casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI. > APIC is also something completely different... > You'd think they could have picked different letters. Both are Intel acron

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-27 Thread Paul Hampson
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:09:02PM +, Nyk Tarr wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:47:03PM -0500, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > > casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI. > APIC is also something completely different... > You'd think they could have picked different letters. Both are Intel acron

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-26 Thread Nyk Tarr
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:47:03PM -0500, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI. > APIC is also something completely different... You'd think they could have picked different letters. -- /__ \_|\/ /\

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-26 Thread Nyk Tarr
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:47:03PM -0500, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI. > APIC is also something completely different... You'd think they could have picked different letters. -- /__ \_|\/ /\ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-26 Thread Paul Hampson
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 11:21:20AM +0200, Baruch Even wrote: > * Jeremy Petzold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021126 11:05]: > > get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel > > source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a: > > > > zcat | patch -p0 > For the record, if

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-26 Thread Paul Hampson
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 11:21:20AM +0200, Baruch Even wrote: > * Jeremy Petzold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021126 11:05]: > > get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel > > source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a: > > > > zcat | patch -p0 > For the record, if

Re: (semi-solved): Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-26 Thread Jeremy Petzold
t;; "Maximilian Pascher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 1:37 AM Subject: (semi-solved): Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > On Monday 25 November 2002 10:47 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > > casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI

Re: (semi-solved): Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-26 Thread Jeremy Petzold
t;; "Maximilian Pascher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 1:37 AM Subject: (semi-solved): Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > On Monday 25 November 2002 10:47 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > > casue I screwe

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-26 Thread Baruch Even
* Jeremy Petzold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021126 11:05]: > get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel > source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a: > > zcat | patch -p0 For the record, if someone is interested in patching the Debian kernel and not the vanilla k

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-26 Thread Frédéric Bothamy
* Oleg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-25 19:19] : > On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > > you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the > > ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) > > into the kernel. then you wil

Re: (semi-solved): Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-26 Thread Paul Hampson
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:37:18AM -0500, Oleg wrote: > On Monday 25 November 2002 10:47 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > > casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI. > > > > get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel > > source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a:

Re: (semi-solved): Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-26 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On Monday 25 November 2002 22:37, Oleg wrote: > > [1] I don't really understand why there are two independent volume controls > in aumix: "vol" is referred to as the main volume control, and "pcm" is > connected to the xmms volume control. PCM is the data output by mp3, ogg, etc. Some sound cards

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-26 Thread Baruch Even
* Jeremy Petzold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021126 11:05]: > get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel > source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a: > > zcat | patch -p0 For the record, if someone is interested in patching the Debian kernel and not the vanilla k

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-26 Thread Frédéric Bothamy
* Oleg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-25 19:19] : > On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > > you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the > > ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) > > into the kernel. then you wil

(semi-solved): Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-26 Thread Oleg
On Monday 25 November 2002 10:47 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI. > > get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel > source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a: > > zcat | patch -p0 > > if it is not zipped do a: > > cat |p

Re: (semi-solved): Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Paul Hampson
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:37:18AM -0500, Oleg wrote: > On Monday 25 November 2002 10:47 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > > casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI. > > > > get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel > > source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a:

Re: (semi-solved): Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On Monday 25 November 2002 22:37, Oleg wrote: > > [1] I don't really understand why there are two independent volume controls > in aumix: "vol" is referred to as the main volume control, and "pcm" is > connected to the xmms volume control. PCM is the data output by mp3, ogg, etc. Some sound cards

(semi-solved): Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Oleg
On Monday 25 November 2002 10:47 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI. > > get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel > source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a: > > zcat | patch -p0 > > if it is not zipped do a: > > cat |p

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Jeremy Petzold
Message - From: "Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maximilian Pascher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 7:40 PM Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > On Monday 25 November 2002 03:20 pm, Maximilian Pascher wrote:

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Jeremy Petzold
Message - From: "Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maximilian Pascher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 7:40 PM Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > On Monday 25 November 2002 03:20

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Paul Hampson
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 03:25:05PM -0800, Fedor Karpelevitch wrote: > I have 2.4.19 from debian (which does not have any pathces applied, I > believe) and it does have ACPI options (and I do not see any APCI) and it > also has some APIC options. Is that what you mean, or am I missing > something?

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Oleg
On Monday 25 November 2002 03:20 pm, Maximilian Pascher wrote: > You have to apply it in Your kernel source-tree. Get it from > http://acpi.sourceforge.net > and patch Your kernel... After that You will find an extra menu option for > ACPI and Your powermanagement will work. > If You don't know how

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Oleg
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the > ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) > into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your > sound mo

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Jeremy Petzold
dohok...I was the victom of my own warning :-p...get teh APCI patch. - Original Message - From: "Fedor Karpelevitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Jeremy Petzold'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 6:25 PM Subject: RE: Intel(

RE: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Fedor Karpelevitch
Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > > > no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI. > - Original Message - > From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:05 PM > Subje

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Paul Hampson
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 03:25:05PM -0800, Fedor Karpelevitch wrote: > I have 2.4.19 from debian (which does not have any pathces applied, I > believe) and it does have ACPI options (and I do not see any APCI) and it > also has some APIC options. Is that what you mean, or am I missing > something?

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Oleg
On Monday 25 November 2002 03:20 pm, Maximilian Pascher wrote: > You have to apply it in Your kernel source-tree. Get it from > http://acpi.sourceforge.net > and patch Your kernel... After that You will find an extra menu option for > ACPI and Your powermanagement will work. > If You don't know how

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Oleg
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the > ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) > into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your > sound mo

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Jeremy Petzold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ivar Alm > Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > > > no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI. > - Original Message - > From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Ivar Alm
5 PM Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: >you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the >ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) >into the kernel. then

RE: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Fedor Karpelevitch
r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > > > no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI. > - Original Message - > From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, November 25, 200

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Jean Delvare
> BTW sound worked with Mandrake 9.0. Does it mean their kernel was > patched? This is highly probable (though I believe it is *not* activated by default - did you recompile it?) -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Jean Delvare
> > Maybe you forgot to enable the OSS compatibility when compiling the > > alsa drivers (or your modules.conf file is bad). > > In fact, I didn't have OSS support in the kernel. Now I compiled it in > (as a module), but I get the same error. Here is the relevant lsmod > output. > > sound

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Jeremy Petzold
no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI. - Original Message - From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:05 PM Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Pet

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Oleg
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the > ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) > into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your > sound mo

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Oleg
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:32 pm, Maximilian Pascher wrote: > Hi Oleg, > do You have some more info about Your hardware? Especially the manufacturer > and type of the Notebook? > > greetz > > Max Max, It's a Fujitsu Lifebook E7110. Oleg

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Oleg
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:03 pm, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I > > installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms > > gives an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): > > No such device"

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Maximilian Pascher
On Monday 25 November 2002 21:05, Ivar Alm wrote: > Just one short question... > I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something different from > the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI > directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after > compilation/

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Ivar Alm
At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your sound module and sound support

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Ivar Alm
y, November 25, 2002 3:05 PM Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: >you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the >ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Maximilian Pascher
> Thanks in advance for your time. > > Oleg > P.S. I'm attaching MS Windows description of the device. > > > [Sound Device] > > ItemValue > NameIntel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > ManufacturerSigmaTel > Status OK > PNP Devi

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Jeremy Petzold
. - Original Message - From: "Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:35 PM Subject: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > Hi > > I'm trying to get this sound "card" to work with 2.4.18 Woody kernel, and I > trie

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Jean Delvare
> BTW sound worked with Mandrake 9.0. Does it mean their kernel was > patched? This is highly probable (though I believe it is *not* activated by default - did you recompile it?) -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Jean Delvare
> I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I > installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms > gives an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): > No such device" > > Any ideas? Maybe you forgot to enable the OSS compatibili

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Jean Delvare
> > Maybe you forgot to enable the OSS compatibility when compiling the > > alsa drivers (or your modules.conf file is bad). > > In fact, I didn't have OSS support in the kernel. Now I compiled it in > (as a module), but I get the same error. Here is the relevant lsmod > output. > > sound

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Jeremy Petzold
no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI. - Original Message - From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:05 PM Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Oleg
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the > ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) > into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your > sound mo

Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Oleg
[Sound Device] Item Value NameIntel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec ManufacturerSigmaTel Status OK PNP Device ID PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2485&SUBSYS_117710CF&REV_02\3&61AAA01&0&FD I/O Port0x1000-0x10FF I/O Port0x1880-0x

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Oleg
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:32 pm, Maximilian Pascher wrote: > Hi Oleg, > do You have some more info about Your hardware? Especially the manufacturer > and type of the Notebook? > > greetz > > Max Max, It's a Fujitsu Lifebook E7110. Oleg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Oleg
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:03 pm, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I > > installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms > > gives an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): > > No such device"

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Maximilian Pascher
On Monday 25 November 2002 21:05, Ivar Alm wrote: > Just one short question... > I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something different from > the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI > directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after > compilation/

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Ivar Alm
At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote: you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest) into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your sound module and sound support

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Maximilian Pascher
> Thanks in advance for your time. > > Oleg > P.S. I'm attaching MS Windows description of the device. > > > [Sound Device] > > ItemValue > NameIntel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > ManufacturerSigmaTel > Status OK > PNP Devi

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Jeremy Petzold
. - Original Message - From: "Oleg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:35 PM Subject: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec > Hi > > I'm trying to get this sound "card" to

Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Jean Delvare
> I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I > installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms > gives an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): > No such device" > > Any ideas? Maybe you forgot to enable the OSS compatibili

Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec

2002-11-25 Thread Oleg
[Sound Device] Item Value NameIntel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec ManufacturerSigmaTel Status OK PNP Device ID PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_2485&SUBSYS_117710CF&REV_02\3&61AAA01&0&FD I/O Port0x1000-0x10FF I/O Port0x1880-0x