Anybody have any experience getting Woody on one of these puppies?
I will look online too, just wondering if anybody here has any first
had experience...
--
--- Dave Woyciesjes
--- ICQ# 905818
Anybody have any experience getting Woody on one of these puppies?
I will look online too, just wondering if anybody here has any first
had experience...
--
--- Dave Woyciesjes
--- ICQ# 905818
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
ork 4:
192.168.1.192 - 192.168.1.255
David Woyciesjes wrote:
>
> criggie wrote:
> >
> >
> > BTW the answer would be to subnet, to use 0-127 on one side and 128-255
> > on the other side, with a netmask of 255.255.255.127
> >
> > --
>
> Actually,
Jason Straw wrote:
>
> The big difference is that 192.168.0.0/24 is not subnetted (well, kinda)
>
> 192.168.0.0/16 is 256 networks of 254 users. at least by RFC just as
> 176.16.0.0/12 and 10.0.0.0/8 are 16 networks of 2**16-2 users and 1
> network of 2**24-2 users.
>
> Jason
I'm sure
criggie wrote:
>
>
> BTW the answer would be to subnet, to use 0-127 on one side and 128-255
> on the other side, with a netmask of 255.255.255.127
>
> --
Actually, that subnet mask would be 255.255.255.128. (In binary -
.1000)
Subnetwork 1:
Network address - 192.168.1.0
Broadcas
ork 4:
192.168.1.192 - 192.168.1.255
David Woyciesjes wrote:
>
> criggie wrote:
> >
> >
> > BTW the answer would be to subnet, to use 0-127 on one side and 128-255
> > on the other side, with a netmask of 255.255.255.127
> >
> > --
>
> Actually,
Jason Straw wrote:
>
> The big difference is that 192.168.0.0/24 is not subnetted (well, kinda)
>
> 192.168.0.0/16 is 256 networks of 254 users. at least by RFC just as
> 176.16.0.0/12 and 10.0.0.0/8 are 16 networks of 2**16-2 users and 1
> network of 2**24-2 users.
>
> Jason
I'm sure
David Z Maze wrote:
>
> David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Praveen Kallakuri wrote:
> >
> >> secondly, how can i split 1.x into different subnets?
> >
> > I'll have to look it up, but it involves using a subnet mask like
criggie wrote:
>
>
> BTW the answer would be to subnet, to use 0-127 on one side and 128-255
> on the other side, with a netmask of 255.255.255.127
>
> --
Actually, that subnet mask would be 255.255.255.128. (In binary -
.1000)
Subnetwork 1:
Network address - 192.168.1.0
Broadcas
Praveen Kallakuri wrote:
>
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 08:52:57 -0400, David Woyciesjes wrote:
>
> > IIRC, you're not supposed to use a 192.168.0.x subnet. Something about
> > the network address part being screwed up. Try using 192.168.1.x and
> > 192.168.2.x
David Z Maze wrote:
>
> David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Praveen Kallakuri wrote:
> >
> >> secondly, how can i split 1.x into different subnets?
> >
> > I'll have to look it up, but it involves using a subnet mask like
Praveen Kallakuri wrote:
>
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 08:52:57 -0400, David Woyciesjes wrote:
>
> > IIRC, you're not supposed to use a 192.168.0.x subnet. Something about
> > the network address part being screwed up. Try using 192.168.1.x and
> > 192.168.2.x
IIRC, you're not supposed to use a 192.168.0.x subnet. Something about
the network address part being screwed up. Try using 192.168.1.x and
192.168.2.x for your two subnets. Of course, you could always split
192.168.1.x into two (or more) different subnets too.
Mind you, the part o
IIRC, you're not supposed to use a 192.168.0.x subnet. Something about
the network address part being screwed up. Try using 192.168.1.x and
192.168.2.x for your two subnets. Of course, you could always split
192.168.1.x into two (or more) different subnets too.
Mind you, the part o
Ralf Nolden wrote:
>
> Question: did anyone try to use qtparted from a Knoppix CD yet to resize an
> NTFS partition (with ntfsresize as the backend) ?
>
> Ralf
Well, I've got a Dell Desktop (no it's not a laptop, but the topic is
the same :). It's got WinXP on a 200GB drive. I want to en
Ralf Nolden wrote:
>
> Question: did anyone try to use qtparted from a Knoppix CD yet to resize an
> NTFS partition (with ntfsresize as the backend) ?
>
> Ralf
Well, I've got a Dell Desktop (no it's not a laptop, but the topic is
the same :). It's got WinXP on a 200GB drive. I want to en
Of course, if you need an indestructible keyboard, check out CTI
Electronics...
http://www.ctielectronics.com/
They have a keyboard, NEMA-4 rated, that measures about 9"x6"x1.25"
http://www.ctielectronics.com/nema4X.htm#KI6000
They also have it in a back-lit version, with "Arrowmouse"
(ke
Of course, if you need an indestructible keyboard, check out CTI
Electronics...
http://www.ctielectronics.com/
They have a keyboard, NEMA-4 rated, that measures about 9"x6"x1.25"
http://www.ctielectronics.com/nema4X.htm#KI6000
They also have it in a back-lit version, with "Arrowmouse"
(ke
> Michael Rose wrote:
>
> I have an install of debian woody on my system and have been wanting
> to upgrade to sarge for some time now but still can't figure out how.
> I read something about debian-installer but idunno how to get that. I
> have tried dist-upgrade but all that does is upgrade some
David Woyciesjes wrote:
>
> Nate Bargmann wrote:
> >
> > * David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003 Feb 05 18:39 -0600]:
> >
> > > Only 256 at 800x600? Looks like (according to this sheet here) you
> > > must've had the 9547-U6H mo
David Woyciesjes wrote:
>
> Nate Bargmann wrote:
> >
> > * David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003 Feb 05 18:39 -0600]:
> >
> > > Only 256 at 800x600? Looks like (according to this sheet here) you
> > > must've had the 9547-U6H mo
Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> * David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003 Feb 05 18:39 -0600]:
>
> > Only 256 at 800x600? Looks like (according to this sheet here) you
> > must've had the 9547-U6H model 760EL, which has a 11.3 DSTN LCD panel.
>
> I belie
Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> * David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003 Feb 05 18:39 -0600]:
>
> > Only 256 at 800x600? Looks like (according to this sheet here) you
> > must've had the 9547-U6H model 760EL, which has a 11.3 DSTN LCD panel.
>
> I belie
Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> * David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003 Feb 04 09:36 -0600]:
> > Hmmm, okay. Well, I can use the existing XF86Config-4 as a template,
> > and fill in the info from the 'working XF86Config (3.x). Hopefully that
> > will do
Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> * David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003 Feb 04 09:36 -0600]:
> > Hmmm, okay. Well, I can use the existing XF86Config-4 as a template,
> > and fill in the info from the 'working XF86Config (3.x). Hopefully that
> > will do
Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> * David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003 Feb 03 13:51 -0600]:
> > Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> > > The ED runs XFree 4.2.x flawlessly, but you'll have no sound support.
>
> > Hmmm. Well, sounds does work on the EL, I c
Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> * David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003 Feb 03 13:51 -0600]:
> > Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> > > The ED runs XFree 4.2.x flawlessly, but you'll have no sound support.
>
> > Hmmm. Well, sounds does work on the EL, I c
Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> * David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003 Jan 31 16:46 -0600]:
> > Okay, I'm starting to get stumped...
> >
> > I've gotten Debian 3.0r1 installed on my Thinkpad 760EL
> > I've tried getting X running, to no
Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> * David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003 Jan 31 16:46 -0600]:
> > Okay, I'm starting to get stumped...
> >
> > I've gotten Debian 3.0r1 installed on my Thinkpad 760EL
> > I've tried getting X running, to no
Okay, I'm starting to get stumped...
I've gotten Debian 3.0r1 installed on my Thinkpad 760EL (80MB RAM, 1GB
HDD). I've tried getting X running, to no avail. I've looked around the
web, tried the TGUI9660, Cyber9320, and Cyber 93285 chip drivers.
Nothing.
Does anybody have a worki
Okay, I'm starting to get stumped...
I've gotten Debian 3.0r1 installed on my Thinkpad 760EL (80MB RAM, 1GB
HDD). I've tried getting X running, to no avail. I've looked around the
web, tried the TGUI9660, Cyber9320, and Cyber 93285 chip drivers.
Nothing.
Does anybody have a worki
Hello there...
I'm gonna cut to the chase here...
Thinkpad 760EL, 1GB HDD, 80MB RAM.
Can anybody provide me with some assistance/info on getting my Intel
EtherExpress PRO/100 Mobile Adapter 16 bit working, so I can load Debian
over the network?
I also have a Xircom RealPort
Hello there...
I'm gonna cut to the chase here...
Thinkpad 760EL, 1GB HDD, 80MB RAM.
Can anybody provide me with some assistance/info on getting my Intel
EtherExpress PRO/100 Mobile Adapter 16 bit working, so I can load Debian
over the network?
I also have a Xircom RealPort
33 matches
Mail list logo
