On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:37:18AM -0500, Oleg wrote:
> On Monday 25 November 2002 10:47 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote:
> > casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI.
> >
> > get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel
> > source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a:
On Monday 25 November 2002 22:37, Oleg wrote:
>
> [1] I don't really understand why there are two independent volume controls
> in aumix: "vol" is referred to as the main volume control, and "pcm" is
> connected to the xmms volume control.
PCM is the data output by mp3, ogg, etc. Some sound cards
On Monday 25 November 2002 10:47 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote:
> casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI.
>
> get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel
> source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a:
>
> zcat | patch -p0
>
> if it is not zipped do a:
>
> cat |p
casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI.
get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel
source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a:
zcat | patch -p0
if it is not zipped do a:
cat |patch -p0
then compile the kernel with ACPI compiled in.
- Original Mes
Hi,
I'm a newbie to Debian. I've been using 'commercial' linux (Red Hat and
Suse) in my desktop for some time, but i've never had a real problem
with them, so i don't know much about the OS.
I bought a Presario 920, with an Athlon XP 1.67MHz, and I couldn't
install Red Hat 8.0. So i've decided it
casue I screwed upit is ACPI not APCI.
get the vanilla kernel. get the ACPI patch, and from the top level kernel
source directory, if the patch file is zipped do a:
zcat | patch -p0
if it is not zipped do a:
cat |patch -p0
then compile the kernel with ACPI compiled in.
- Original Mes
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 03:25:05PM -0800, Fedor Karpelevitch wrote:
> I have 2.4.19 from debian (which does not have any pathces applied, I
> believe) and it does have ACPI options (and I do not see any APCI) and it
> also has some APIC options. Is that what you mean, or am I missing
> something?
Hi,
I'm a newbie to Debian. I've been using 'commercial' linux (Red Hat and
Suse) in my desktop for some time, but i've never had a real problem
with them, so i don't know much about the OS.
I bought a Presario 920, with an Athlon XP 1.67MHz, and I couldn't
install Red Hat 8.0. So i've decided it
On Monday 25 November 2002 03:20 pm, Maximilian Pascher wrote:
> You have to apply it in Your kernel source-tree. Get it from
> http://acpi.sourceforge.net
> and patch Your kernel... After that You will find an extra menu option for
> ACPI and Your powermanagement will work.
> If You don't know how
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote:
> you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the
> ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest)
> into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your
> sound mo
dohok...I was the victom of my own warning :-p...get teh APCI patch.
- Original Message -
From: "Fedor Karpelevitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Jeremy Petzold'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 6:25 PM
Subject: RE: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
I have 2.4.19 from debian (which does not have any pathces applied, I
believe) and it does have ACPI options (and I do not see any APCI) and it
also has some APIC options. Is that what you mean, or am I missing
something?
--
fedor.
"Ubi non accusator, ibi non judex."
(Where there is no poli
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 03:25:05PM -0800, Fedor Karpelevitch wrote:
> I have 2.4.19 from debian (which does not have any pathces applied, I
> believe) and it does have ACPI options (and I do not see any APCI) and it
> also has some APIC options. Is that what you mean, or am I missing
> something?
On Monday 25 November 2002 03:20 pm, Maximilian Pascher wrote:
> You have to apply it in Your kernel source-tree. Get it from
> http://acpi.sourceforge.net
> and patch Your kernel... After that You will find an extra menu option for
> ACPI and Your powermanagement will work.
> If You don't know how
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote:
> you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the
> ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest)
> into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your
> sound mo
dohok...I was the victom of my own warning :-p...get teh APCI patch.
- Original Message -
From: "Fedor Karpelevitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Jeremy Petzold'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 6:25 PM
Subject: RE: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller
Ouch...
Better clean my glasses... Or rather get a pair?
At 21:39 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote:
no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI.
- Original Message -
From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:05 PM
Subject: Re:
I have 2.4.19 from debian (which does not have any pathces applied, I
believe) and it does have ACPI options (and I do not see any APCI) and it
also has some APIC options. Is that what you mean, or am I missing
something?
--
fedor.
"Ubi non accusator, ibi non judex."
(Where there is no poli
> BTW sound worked with Mandrake 9.0. Does it mean their kernel was
> patched?
This is highly probable (though I believe it is *not* activated by
default - did you recompile it?)
--
Jean Delvare
http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
> > Maybe you forgot to enable the OSS compatibility when compiling the
> > alsa drivers (or your modules.conf file is bad).
>
> In fact, I didn't have OSS support in the kernel. Now I compiled it in
> (as a module), but I get the same error. Here is the relevant lsmod
> output.
>
> sound
no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI.
- Original Message -
From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote:
>you need
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote:
> you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the
> ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest)
> into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your
> sound mo
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:32 pm, Maximilian Pascher wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
> do You have some more info about Your hardware? Especially the manufacturer
> and type of the Notebook?
>
> greetz
>
> Max
Max,
It's a Fujitsu Lifebook E7110.
Oleg
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:03 pm, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I
> > installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms
> > gives an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp):
> > No such device"
On Monday 25 November 2002 21:05, Ivar Alm wrote:
> Just one short question...
> I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something different from
> the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI
> directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after
> compilation/
reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello if you've compiled the kernel for a toshiba
2595xDVD and the sound, modem, X and printer work,
would you be so kind as to send me the .config file
from the top level source directory?
It would be like Knoppix with out Loop back.
=
#--
At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote:
you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the
ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest)
into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your
sound module and sound support
On November 25, 2002 02:37 pm, Christian Gennerat wrote:
> >Does that mean I should stick with the stand-alone PCMCIA modules?
>
> No, but try "modprobe i82365" instead.
I actually went back to a kernel without pcmcia support and installed the
stand-alone modules from source already. With /etc/
Ouch...
Better clean my glasses... Or rather get a pair?
At 21:39 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote:
no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI.
- Original Message -
From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:0
Hello to everybody,
I am trying to have my wireless pcmcia card zyair B-100 with my notebook on
which I have installed debian/unstable with kernel 2.4.19 an package
pcmcia-cs 3.2.2-1, but I have smoe doubts and problems.
First of all I was told from someone who had success in make it work with
r
On Monday 25 November 2002 19:35, Oleg wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to get this sound "card" to work with 2.4.18 Woody kernel, and I
> tried ac97_codec.o i810_audio.o soundcore.o kernel drivers, which lead to
> a very peculiar barely audible sound (like a modulated system beep).
>
> I also heard of
you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the
ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest)
into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your
sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in.
- Origina
> BTW sound worked with Mandrake 9.0. Does it mean their kernel was
> patched?
This is highly probable (though I believe it is *not* activated by
default - did you recompile it?)
--
Jean Delvare
http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
> I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I
> installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms
> gives an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp):
> No such device"
>
> Any ideas?
Maybe you forgot to enable the OSS compatibili
> > Maybe you forgot to enable the OSS compatibility when compiling the
> > alsa drivers (or your modules.conf file is bad).
>
> In fact, I didn't have OSS support in the kernel. Now I compiled it in
> (as a module), but I get the same error. Here is the relevant lsmod
> output.
>
> sound
no no...what you see in the kernel is APCI...it is diffrent than ACPI.
- Original Message -
From: "Ivar Alm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: Intel(r) AC'97 Audio Controller - SigmaTel Codec
At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzol
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:24 pm, Jeremy Petzold wrote:
> you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the
> ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest)
> into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your
> sound mo
Hi
I'm trying to get this sound "card" to work with 2.4.18 Woody kernel, and I
tried ac97_codec.o i810_audio.o soundcore.o kernel drivers, which lead to a
very peculiar barely audible sound (like a modulated system beep).
I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:32 pm, Maximilian Pascher wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
> do You have some more info about Your hardware? Especially the manufacturer
> and type of the Notebook?
>
> greetz
>
> Max
Max,
It's a Fujitsu Lifebook E7110.
Oleg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Monday 25 November 2002 02:03 pm, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I
> > installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms
> > gives an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp):
> > No such device"
On Monday 25 November 2002 21:05, Ivar Alm wrote:
> Just one short question...
> I have read all over about the ACPI patch. Is that something different from
> the ACPI options in my kernel config? Can I compile a kernel for ACPI
> directly, or do I have to apply a patch for it after
> compilation/
reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello if you've compiled the kernel for a toshiba
2595xDVD and the sound, modem, X and printer work,
would you be so kind as to send me the .config file
from the top level source directory?
It would be like Knoppix with out Loop back.
=
#--
At 20:24 2002-11-25, Jeremy Petzold wrote:
you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the
ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest)
into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your
sound module and sound support
On November 25, 2002 02:37 pm, Christian Gennerat wrote:
> >Does that mean I should stick with the stand-alone PCMCIA modules?
>
> No, but try "modprobe i82365" instead.
I actually went back to a kernel without pcmcia support and installed the
stand-alone modules from source already. With /etc/
Dear Gary,
I would like to reply to your posting at the Debian Mailinglist but
since I do not know how to do I write to you personally.
I just bought the Desknote A928 and I have similar problems as you.
Concerning the first one, adding the boot paramater
"video=vga16:off" helps in my case. I do
Hello to everybody,
I am trying to have my wireless pcmcia card zyair B-100 with my notebook on
which I have installed debian/unstable with kernel 2.4.19 an package
pcmcia-cs 3.2.2-1, but I have smoe doubts and problems.
First of all I was told from someone who had success in make it work with
r
On Monday 25 November 2002 19:35, Oleg wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to get this sound "card" to work with 2.4.18 Woody kernel, and I
> tried ac97_codec.o i810_audio.o soundcore.o kernel drivers, which lead to
> a very peculiar barely audible sound (like a modulated system beep).
>
> I also heard of
Hello debian-laptop,
my new notebook Samsung T10 XVC 2000 runs mostly fine with woody, but
with apm I have the problem, that the battery is not recognized as
shown below:
kormoran:~# apm -d
APM BIOS 1.2 (kernel driver 1.16)
AC on-line, no system battery
Using device 0x0a86, 1.16: 1.2
APM Flags =
you need to patch the kernel with the ACPI patch and then compile all the
ACPI options(except one near the top of the list that blanks out the rest)
into the kernel. then you will magicly have sound as long as you have your
sound module and sound support set as modules or compiled in.
- Origina
> I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I
> installed alsa-drivers-0.9: `modprobe snd-intel8x0` succeeds, but xmms
> gives an error: "oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp):
> No such device"
>
> Any ideas?
Maybe you forgot to enable the OSS compatibili
Hi
I'm trying to get this sound "card" to work with 2.4.18 Woody kernel, and I
tried ac97_codec.o i810_audio.o soundcore.o kernel drivers, which lead to a
very peculiar barely audible sound (like a modulated system beep).
I also heard of the reports of people using ALSA on this laptop, so I
Dear Gary,
I would like to reply to your posting at the Debian Mailinglist but
since I do not know how to do I write to you personally.
I just bought the Desknote A928 and I have similar problems as you.
Concerning the first one, adding the boot paramater
"video=vga16:off" helps in my case. I do
On November 25, 2002 03:18 am, Christian Gennerat wrote:
> Have you used yenta_socket before ?
> Have you really Cardbus on your P120 laptop ?
> What model is it ?
> Is there some BIOS setting about PCMCIA/CARDBUS ?
No, I've never used yenta_socket before. I don't know if I actually have
Cardbus
Hello debian-laptop,
my new notebook Samsung T10 XVC 2000 runs mostly fine with woody, but
with apm I have the problem, that the battery is not recognized as
shown below:
kormoran:~# apm -d
APM BIOS 1.2 (kernel driver 1.16)
AC on-line, no system battery
Using device 0x0a86, 1.16: 1.2
APM Flags =
On November 25, 2002 03:18 am, Christian Gennerat wrote:
> Have you used yenta_socket before ?
> Have you really Cardbus on your P120 laptop ?
> What model is it ?
> Is there some BIOS setting about PCMCIA/CARDBUS ?
No, I've never used yenta_socket before. I don't know if I actually have
Cardbus
Hello,
Here's the problem: i want to use my old laptop (486DX, 8Mb RAM, 800
Mb HDD, Fujitsu pcmcia netcard) as X-terminal. First, I tried to make
a boot floppy with 2.4.18 kernel, pcmcia support, network card driver
and nfsroot compiled directly in kernel. But on booting it doesn't up
my network c
Levi Waldron a écrit:
On a new woody laptop install I used the bf-2.4 stock kernel, the
pcmcia-modules-2.4.18-bf2.4 binary package, and the pcmcia-cs package and got
the PCMCIA network card working perfectly. Had to manually edit
/etc/network/interfaces.
Have you used yenta_socket befor
Hello,
Here's the problem: i want to use my old laptop (486DX, 8Mb RAM, 800
Mb HDD, Fujitsu pcmcia netcard) as X-terminal. First, I tried to make
a boot floppy with 2.4.18 kernel, pcmcia support, network card driver
and nfsroot compiled directly in kernel. But on booting it doesn't up
my network c
Levi Waldron a écrit:
On a new woody laptop install I used the bf-2.4 stock kernel, the
pcmcia-modules-2.4.18-bf2.4 binary package, and the pcmcia-cs package and got
the PCMCIA network card working perfectly. Had to manually edit
/etc/network/interfaces.
Have you used yenta_socket before
61 matches
Mail list logo
