Control: found -1 linux/4.12.6-1
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:59:38 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 22:27:10 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> [...]
> > If you add 'earlyprintk=ttyS0' to the kernel command line and delete
> > 'quiet', does it l
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 13:02:18 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
Control: found -1 linux/4.12.13-1
>
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 09:59:38 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> Hello again,
> I tested the new kernel version that has recently migrated to Debian
> testing.
>
> Unfortunately,
Control: found -1 linux/4.12.13-1
[I should have put the above control command at the beginning of my
previous message... I am doing so now.]
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco
Control: found -1 linux/4.11-1~exp1
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 20:25:26 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-09-24 at 17:54 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Is there anything that can be done in order to pinpoint the issue and
> > solve it once and for all?!?
>
> Yo
Control: found -1 linux/4.13.4-1
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 23:26:40 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> OK, here's the result of the test, after some bisecting:
>
> • linux-image-4.10.0-trunk-686-unsigned_4.10.7-1~exp1_i386.deb
>
>boots correctly
>
>$ uname -a
&
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 02:12:45 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 23:30 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > For the record, I have just tried with the latest Linux kernel in
> > testing:
> >
> > Loading Linux 4.13.0-1-686 ...
Control: found -1 linux/4.13.4-2
On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 19:51:57 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> I have just tried with 'earlyprintk=ttyS0,19200,n8' (and without
> 'quiet'), since I have 'console=ttyS0,19200,n8' among the normal
> parameters.
>
&g
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 23:55:49 +0200 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
[...]
> I found a number of kernel traces in /var/log/kern.log (attached).
> The times showed that the first traces were experienced well before
> I came back to the box, while the last ones were obtained during
>
Control: reassign -1 linux 4.6.4-1
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:47:40 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> After restarting the X session, I found out that the same issues happen
> even with the "intel" X video driver.
Update: I cannot understand why the behavior changed, but I a
. Please let me know.
Thanks for your time!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpeEKD6WaMnv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e files for inclusion in Debian main?
It would be very nice to have them in firmware-free!
Please let me know, thanks for your time.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
Gn
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 06:35:00 +0300 Paul Fertser wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 10:29:11PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Is there any progress in properly packaging these two DFSG-free
> > firmware files for inclusion in Debian main?
>
> It's sitti
Control: reassign -1 libdrm-intel1 2.4.68-1
On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:06:47 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> Hence, I think it's definitely a Linux kernel bug.
> I am consequently reassigning the bug report.
[...]
Update: after today's upgrade, I tried to boot again with th
force the machine to automatically boot the previous kernel version
(4.6.4-1).
I hope the bug may be fixed soon.
Thanks to the Debian Kernel Team for any help they may provide.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
...
x27;s not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgp20hv6fnWpE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 01 Nov 2016 10:28:40 -0600 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 11:31 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > I expected to find a linux-image-4.8.0-1-686 package in unstable, but
> > it seems to be only present as a virtual package, provided by
> >
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 10:33:19 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
[...]
> Hi Francesco,
Hello Salvatore,
thanks a lot for your prompt reply!
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 08:27:52PM +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
[...]
> > [5.363599] kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/pat.
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 14:28:12 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
[...]
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 12:32:14PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > I am afraid I'll have to wait for the patched kernel image to enter
> > Debian unstable, in order to check whether the patc
On Sun, 30 Dec 2018 09:31:52 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 14:28:12 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
[...]
> > 4.19.13 upstream was
> > just released. So we will import that one directly and preapre towards
> > a furthre sid update.
>
> Sounds grea
niverse is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
..
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpMCyfFUwM4I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: normal
I installed Debian sarge (3.1 r0) on an old Pentium machine, following the
manual debootstrap procedure (described in the Debian sarge installation
guide, appendix C.). I could not use debian-installer because I didn't
have enoug
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:41:27 +0900 Horms wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 07:10:24PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > # mount -t ext2 /dev/fd0 /media/floppy/
> > mount: /dev/fd0 is not a valid block device
> > # ls -altrF /dev/fd0
> > brw-rw 1 root floppy
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:59:30 +0900 Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 11:41:05PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:41:27 +0900 Horms wrote:
[...]
> > > Are you sure that the drive is actually at 0x03f2?
> >
> > How can I check this?
> &
x-image-2.6.20-1-amd64
What do you suggest?
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html
Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through?
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:00:46 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> I wonder if I could just install
> linux-image-2.6.20-1-amd64_*_amd64.deb from sid:
[...]
I installed 2.6.20-1 from sid onto my lenny box: it installs cleanly and
works fine. /dev/agpgart is correctly created and 965G gr
Package: linux-image-2.6.20-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.20-3
Severity: normal
Hi!
It seems I'm not able to use I2C probes on a box with an ASUS P5B-VM
motherboard. I think the appropriate modules are loaded (see below),
but, nonetheless:
$ ls -altrF /sys/bus/i2c/devices/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 4 roo
Package: linux-image-2.6.20-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.20-3
Severity: normal
Hi!
It seems I'm not able to read ACPI temperature or fan data on a box with
an ASUS P5B-VM motherboard. I think the appropriate modules are loaded
(see below: thermal and fan), but, nonetheless:
$ ls -altrF /proc/acpi/the
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.21-6
Followup-For: Bug #428614
I still experience this bug in current lenny kernel (linux-2.6
version 2.6.21-6).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.2
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.21-6
Followup-For: Bug #428615
No good luck yet: I still see this bug in current lenny (linux-2.6
version 2.6.21-6).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:30:19 +0200 maximilian attems wrote:
> hello,
Hi there! :)
>
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.20-1-amd64
> > Version: 2.6.20-3
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >
://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html
Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through?
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpnv8UGOV4a1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
a given grammar: bison
comes to mind).
> Right now there doesn't seem to be a strong opinion in the
> project about that, but I expect it's a discussion that needs to be
> had.
IMO, this discussion desperately needs to be had. I think the right
time to have it is after etch i
_Coming to America_
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp00V3eej5DU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[1], as far
as non-programmatic works and DFSG#2 are concerned.
The discussion about source code of non-programmatic works is
(unfortunately) still to be had.
[1] see the thread that started with
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/10/msg00185.html
--
But it is also tradition that times *
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 01:20:43 +0100 Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:55:45AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 23:59:18 +0100 Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > Nope, because you can ship the source code and the o
your keyring in a piecewise fashion?
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpXMlZl8KrE8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:53:01 +0100 maximilian attems wrote:
> Quoting Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I also have a motherboard with Intel 965G integrated graphics (it's
> > an Asus P5B-VM, for the record) and I think that getting
Package: linux-2.6
Followup-For: Bug #311185
If I understand the following output correctly, the current (testing) Linux
kernel does *not* have any preemption activated:
$ grep -i EMPT /boot/config-2.6.22-3-amd64
CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
# CONFIG_PREEMP
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:24:15 +0100 maximilian attems wrote:
> hello francesco,
>
> nice to read you! :)
Hi Maximilian!
Thanks for your quick reply.
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 12:10:04AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > By reading the bug log, I seem to understan
!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp4HJa8S69Lf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html
New! Version 0.6 available! What? See for yourself!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpCBzqqazK8a.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 15:45:54 -0800 Brandon Philips wrote:
> On 23:05 Wed 02 Jan 2008, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I tried linux-image-2.6.24-rc6-amd64 (version
> > 2.6.24~rc6-1~experimental.1~snapshot.10007) from trunk, but I still
> > experience this bug:
> >
&
stay closed.
Thank you for pinging me.
Bye!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpRWAWZ00x7x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
nks for your time and dedication!
Bye.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
cpupower.default
Description:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 22:09:10 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> Is there room for improvement?
> Yes, I think there is.
> For instance, the script /usr/libexec/cpupower could be translated to
> POSIX shell, getting rid of its bashisms.
Here we go, I modified the script by trans
On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 16:48:58 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> Please find attached the three updated files.
>
> Tested on one of my systems, where I purged cpufrequtils and installed
> linux-cpupower and then I issued the following commands:
>
> # install -m 644 cpu
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 23:21:32 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 16:48:58 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Once again, please accept the "patch" and incorporate the files (or
> > further enhanced versions of them) into linux-cpupower.
>
> Have you
ed
> some guidance to do so.
[...]
Wouldn't it be so much easier, if you just forward my bug report
upstream?
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA
On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 20:56:08 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
[...]
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 07:10:08PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Wouldn't it be so much easier, if you just forward my bug report
> > upstream?
>
> You are directly affected and we cannot
(including me!) are kept
in the loop.
Thanks a lot for your time and for any help you may provide!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2
ter=remote-fs.target
?
Could you please test this modification and see whether it cures your
issue?
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
cpupower.service
Description: Binary data
pgpZlnhojSnaT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hoops is beginning
to be a little time consuming... :-(
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
xra
am not in Cc...
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpbYMoEvTsfq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 17:54:34 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> I reiterate the request to people from the Debian Kernel Team: could
> someone please step in, test the three files, and share his/her insight
[...]
> ?
Dear Debian Kernel Team,
this bug needs love, could some of you pleas
n document!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpUPkfWNex4q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ye.
--
New location for my website! Update your bookmarks!
http://www.inventati.org/frx
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp4e8hcmlG4y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:40:15 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 16:56 +0200, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
[...]
> > Please update the debian/copyright file, so that it reflects the
> > current content of the package.
> > Thanks in advance.
>
> Policy r
notfound 536147 2.6.30-1
thanks
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 01:05:03 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:00:31PM +0200, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
> > According to the security tracker [1], CVE-2009-0029 is fixed in
> > testing, but not in unstable.
>
> Th
notfound 536148 2.6.30-1
thanks
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 01:10:49 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote:
[...]
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:11:38PM +0200, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
> > According to the security tracker [1], CVE-2009-1758 is fixed in
> > testing, but not in unstable.
>
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 21:30:05 +0100 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:04:25PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I tried linux-image-2.6.24-rc6-amd64 (version
> > 2.6.24~rc6-1~experimental.1~snapshot.10007) from trunk, but I still
> > experience this bug:
&
ps redirected to the
sound card, and configurable through alsamixer, no beep from the
PC-speaker) with the current kernel?
Please someone help me!
Thanks for your time.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpa2cHeFjOpB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
et).
I still experience the bug with:
$ uname -srvmo
Linux 6.11.4-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.11.4-1 (2024-10-20) x86_64
GNU/Linux
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 11:55:18 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 05:23:10PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Or otherwise, if you think there's something wrong with them, could you
> > please explain what is wrong? Maybe there's a way to fix them..
e InfiniBand network.
However, I can check whether those issm* symlinks are created in
/sys/class/infiniband_mad/
I really hope that this is enough to pinpoint the first bad
commit...
Any better ideas?
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
...
On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 21:38:37 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 07:54:43PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > I will try to continue to bisect by testing the resulting kernels on a
> > compute node: there's no OpenSM there and it cannot run anyway, if
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 09:58:03 +0100 Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
[...]
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 11:15:03PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:22:26 +0100 Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
[...]
> > > I guess the kernel provides a directory "/sys/class/infiniband_mad&
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:22:26 +0100 Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
[...]
> Hello,
Hi Uwe, thanks for your followup.
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 07:53:52PM +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
[...]
> > I filed this bug report against the Debian Linux kernel, in order
> > to w
the output of 'ibv_devices': I hope this is a correct way to answer
your question.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 114
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 16:37:37 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> I reiterate the request to integrate the three files into the
> 'linux-cpupower' package, with the systemd service disabled by default.
[...]
I have further improved the 'cpupower.sh' after analyzing
you need any further information that
I can easily gather.
Otherwise, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag, unless it means that the
bug report is waiting for data from other people (but not from me).
Thanks for your time.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpyJfEMhd3lf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:02:37 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> Hello Salvatore,
> thanks for following up.
[...]
By the way, I am also experiencing a huge performance hit on the I/O
through the NFS shares.
Please let me explain. On the host where the NFS server runs (let's
call
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:12:51 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> By the way, I am also experiencing a huge performance hit on the I/O
> through the NFS shares.
[...]
I am more and more puzzled.
Now, after some (irrelevant?) package upgrades:
Will install 12 packages, and remove 0 pa
's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgphDSg7C1RV5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:21:53 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
[...]
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 07:25:37PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Is there any chance to see the three files included in the
> > 'linux-cpupower' package?
[...]
> Let me try to quickly summ
On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 17:52:44 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> Please, pretty please, ship the three files with the 'linux-cpupower'
> package, setting the systemd service disabled by default.
>
> Let's fix this bug once and for all!
[...]
Is there any chance to s
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.11.6-1
Severity: important
Hello,
after upgrading an i386 box (Soekris net5501) running testing (buster),
I found out that the newly migrated Linux kernel fails to boot.
Looking at the boot through the serial console reveals the following
few messages:
Booting 'De
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.19.12-1
Severity: important
Hi!
After upgrading an i386 box (Soekris net5501) running testing (buster),
I found out that the newly migrated Linux kernel fails to boot.
Looking at the boot through the serial console reveals the attached
output, in which I spotted the
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.9.7-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: invernom...@paranoici.org
Hello,
on a laptop where I installed Debian testing some 6 months ago,
I noticed that the logs are continuously filled with call traces
like the attached snippet (taken from /var/log/kern.log ).
It seems
Package: firmware-nonfree
Version: 0.15
Severity: important
Hi!
Let me first thank you for maintaining this package in non-free,
and for moving Linux-kernel-shipped non-free firmware blobs from
the Linux kernel package to it.
IMHO, this is really the Right Thing™ to do, as it abides by
the Debian
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.30-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hello Debian kernel team!
According to the security tracker [1], CVE-2009-0029 is fixed in
testing, but not in unstable.
It's fixed in testing because it was fixed in a stable (lenny) point
relea
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.30-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hello again Debian kernel team!
According to the security tracker [1], CVE-2009-1758 is fixed in
testing, but not in unstable.
It's fixed in testing because it was fixed in a stable (lenny) point
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.11.2-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: invernom...@paranoici.org
Hello,
I encountered a major issue on an HPC cluster head node, as soon as
I upgraded the Linux kernel from version 6.10.11-1 to version 6.11.2-1 .
The issue is that the head node runs OpenSM (InfiniB
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:2.8.2-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
X-Debbugs-Cc: invernom...@paranoici.org
Dear maintainers,
I encountered a big issue, while upgrading package 'nfs-kernel-server'
on the box where the NFS server runs (the clients run on th
83 matches
Mail list logo
