On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 02:35:49AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> The 3ware one doesn't need the bugreport reopened. Some alternative
>> completely different fix was merged that makes the patch for it
>> unnecessary. So that's 100% of the patches to be dropped included
>> upstream in some f
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 02:35:49AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 02:12:10AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > The 3ware patch looks bogus, most of the others got sent upstream at
> > least once before (sorry hch). Looks like I've been told which side bk
> > tre
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 02:12:10AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> The 3ware patch looks bogus, most of the others got sent upstream at
> least once before (sorry hch). Looks like I've been told which side bk
> trees the fixes are sitting in or otherwise which ones aren't in side
> bk trees e
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 06:12:26PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> I've sent a number of bugfixes upstream for inclusion in 2.6.7, based
> on hch's breakup of the old cvs tree:
> patches/00_dont-dereference-netdev.name-before-register_netdev:2:This fixes
> Debian BTS #234817.
> patches/00_dr
I've sent a number of bugfixes upstream for inclusion in 2.6.7, based
on hch's breakup of the old cvs tree:
patches/00_dont-dereference-netdev.name-before-register_netdev:2:This fixes
Debian BTS #234817.
patches/00_drivers-atkbd-quiten:2:This fixes Debian BTS #239036.
patches/00_drivers-net-irda-
5 matches
Mail list logo
