On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 02:35:49AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 02:12:10AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > > The 3ware patch looks bogus, most of the others got sent upstream at > > least once before (sorry hch). Looks like I've been told which side bk > > trees the fixes are sitting in or otherwise which ones aren't in side > > bk trees etc., as well as discovered lapsed mailing list memberships > > that impeded my search for previous sends of the things. > > The 3ware one doesn't need the bugreport reopened. Some alternative > completely different fix was merged that makes the patch for it > unnecessary. So that's 100% of the patches to be dropped included > upstream in some form or other.
Actually the patch upstream is pretty much exactly what was in the original bugreport. I have no idea where the patch that is in the current kernel-patch-debian came from.
