On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 02:12:10AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > The 3ware patch looks bogus, most of the others got sent upstream at > least once before (sorry hch). Looks like I've been told which side bk > trees the fixes are sitting in or otherwise which ones aren't in side > bk trees etc., as well as discovered lapsed mailing list memberships > that impeded my search for previous sends of the things.
The 3ware one doesn't need the bugreport reopened. Some alternative completely different fix was merged that makes the patch for it unnecessary. So that's 100% of the patches to be dropped included upstream in some form or other. -- wli
