On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 11:41:03AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I've uploaded a split of Herbert's last kernel-patch-debian into small
> patches, each handling a particular change at
>
> http://verein.lst.de/~hch/debian.tgz
New version uploaded. No changes in the split, but the annoat
Jens Schmalzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Michael Banck writes:
>> People who want to build their own kernels should know how to run
>> 'apt-get source' by now.
>
> Assume for a moment they get Debian on CDs and don't feel like getting
> the source set as well just for rebuilding the k
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 03:56:12AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 2004 10:13:16 +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > BTW, Manoj, what is your thought on debconfifing the
> > pre/post/inst/rm script, this would be usefull for not having d-i
> > bomb on the minor glit
On Mon, 24 May 2004 10:13:16 +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> BTW, Manoj, what is your thought on debconfifing the
> pre/post/inst/rm script, this would be usefull for not having d-i
> bomb on the minor glitch concerning those trying to ask questions or
> something.
I am fo
Manoj wrote:
> At the very least, make-kpkg can do something like looking
> for ./debian/patches dir and apply patches found there for official
> kernels, or if the user has asked for those patches to be added.
Hm. I'm not sure it'd be a good idea to have the official kernels use
special mechan
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 10:11:34PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2004 20:57:01 +0200, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 07:38:01PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> Well, if I have a collections of patches and want to build a
> >> kernel-so
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 10:07:33PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I would be happy to incorporate any such patches into
> kernel-package; preferably if we can keep the interface kernel
> version agnostic.
>
> At the very least, make-kpkg can do something like looking
> for ./debia
On Sun, 23 May 2004 20:57:01 +0200, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 07:38:01PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Well, if I have a collections of patches and want to build a
>> kernel-source package make-kpkg kernel_source sounds like the right
>> tool to archiv
On Sun, 23 May 2004 19:38:01 +0200, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 07:16:00PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>> > > Um, what's wrong with kernel-package?
>> >
>> > Nothing if you ask me. I'm just guessing there was a reason that
>> > it isn't used for the defa
Hi,
Michael Banck writes:
> BTW, while we're at it: Wouldn't now be a good time to check whether
> we still need those kernel-source binary packages?
Yes we do.
> Why don't we have the vanilla[1] kernel as .orig.tar.gz, the debian
> build system as .diff.gz, and the needed patches either in the
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 07:38:01PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Well, if I have a collections of patches and want to build a
> kernel-source package make-kpkg kernel_source sounds like the right tool
> to archive that, no?
BTW, while we're at it: Wouldn't now be a good time to check whether
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 07:35:34PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Another good reason why I only should help out on patch management
> and stay away from packaging as far as possible :)
No, another reason why should take a couple of minutes to look into it
and then sign up, dude!
Thanks for t
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 07:16:00PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > > Um, what's wrong with kernel-package?
> > >
> > > Nothing if you ask me. I'm just guessing there was a reason that
> > > it isn't used for the default kernel-source and kernel-image.
> >
> > It isn'
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 07:16:00PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > Um, what's wrong with kernel-package?
> >
> > Nothing if you ask me. I'm just guessing there was a reason that
> > it isn't used for the default kernel-source and kernel-image.
>
> It isn't used for kernel-source because kernel
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 07:14:39PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> > > Um, what's wrong with kernel-package?
>
> > Nothing if you ask me. I'm just guessing there was a reason that
> > it isn't used for the default kernel-source and kernel-image.
>
> But it *is* being used now. I just checked th
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
[snip]
> > Um, what's wrong with kernel-package?
>
> Nothing if you ask me. I'm just guessing there was a reason that
> it isn't used for the default kernel-source and kernel-image.
It isn't used for kernel-source because kernel-source doesn't build
kernels. For kernel-i
Hi,
Christoph Hellwig writes:
> > Um, what's wrong with kernel-package?
> Nothing if you ask me. I'm just guessing there was a reason that
> it isn't used for the default kernel-source and kernel-image.
But it *is* being used now. I just checked the source packages
kernel-source-2.6.6 and ker
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 06:43:55PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Christoph Hellwig writes:
>
> > I've also tried to integrate it with the kernel-experimental
> > cdbs-based packaging, but it seems the build system tries to
> > outsmart me all the time so ? gave up..
>
> Um, what's wron
Hi,
Christoph Hellwig writes:
> I've also tried to integrate it with the kernel-experimental
> cdbs-based packaging, but it seems the build system tries to
> outsmart me all the time so ¿ gave up..
Um, what's wrong with kernel-package?
Regards, Jens.
--
J'qbpbe, le m'en fquz pe j'qbpbe!
Le ve
I've uploaded a split of Herbert's last kernel-patch-debian into small
patches, each handling a particular change at
http://verein.lst.de/~hch/debian.tgz
I've also tried to integrate it with the kernel-experimental cdbs-based
packaging, but it seems the build system tries to outsmart me a
20 matches
Mail list logo
