On Sun, 23 May 2004 19:38:01 +0200, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 07:16:00PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>> > > Um, what's wrong with kernel-package?
>> >
>> > Nothing if you ask me. I'm just guessing there was a reason that
>> > it isn't used for the default kernel-source and kernel-image.
>>
>> It isn't used for kernel-source because kernel-source doesn't build
>> kernels. For kernel-image it is used, AFAICS.
> Well, if I have a collections of patches and want to build a
> kernel-source package make-kpkg kernel_source sounds like the right
> tool to archive that, no?
I would be happy to incorporate any such patches into
kernel-package; preferably if we can keep the interface kernel
version agnostic.
At the very least, make-kpkg can do something like looking
for ./debian/patches dir and apply patches found there for official
kernels, or if the user has asked for those patches to be added.
manoj
--
Weeds are the blight of fields. Anger is the blight of
mankind. Consequently offerings to those free from anger are of great
fruit. 357
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
