Re: preparing 2.6.10

2005-01-07 Thread Andres Salomon
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:15:51 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > Alright, enough people are bothering me for 2.6.10 that we should probably > get it into sid. I've committed a bunch of bk backports to the svn 2.6.10 > k-s directory (small, obvious fixes for the most part); I'm going to aim > for uploa

Re: preparing 2.6.10

2005-01-06 Thread Horms
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:19:10AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:42:48 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > [...] > >> The IRQ-after-swsusp-awakening patch (attached). Needed to make > >> some hardware drivers

Re: preparing 2.6.10

2005-01-06 Thread Andres Salomon
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:42:48 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: [...] >> The IRQ-after-swsusp-awakening patch (attached). Needed to make >> some hardware drivers work after resuming from swsusp (Source: >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: preparing 2.6.10

2005-01-06 Thread Andres Salomon
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:06:38 +0900, Horms wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:15:51AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: >> Alright, enough people are bothering me for 2.6.10 that we should probably >> get it into sid. I've committed a bunch of bk backports to the svn 2.6.10 >> k-s directory (small, ob

Re: preparing 2.6.10

2005-01-06 Thread Horms
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:15:51AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > Alright, enough people are bothering me for 2.6.10 that we should probably > get it into sid. I've committed a bunch of bk backports to the svn 2.6.10 > k-s directory (small, obvious fixes for the most part); I'm going to aim > for

Re: preparing 2.6.10

2005-01-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > * Andres Salomon [Wed, Jan 05 2005, 12:15:51AM]: > > Alright, enough people are bothering me for 2.6.10 that we should probably > > get it into sid. I've committed a bunch of bk backports to the svn 2.6.10 > > k-s director

Re: preparing 2.6.10

2005-01-05 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Andres Salomon [Wed, Jan 05 2005, 12:15:51AM]: > Alright, enough people are bothering me for 2.6.10 that we should probably > get it into sid. I've committed a bunch of bk backports to the svn 2.6.10 > k-s directory (small, obvious fixes for the most part); I'm going to aim > for uploa

Re: preparing 2.6.10

2005-01-05 Thread Andres Salomon
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 10:18 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: [...] > > ia64-generic-no-smp.dpatch still needs a forward-port. > drivers-scsi-generic_proc_info.dpatch should be dropped, but we need to > make sure the kernelk-image packages depend on the latest initrd-tools > Alright, I'll look int

Re: preparing 2.6.10

2005-01-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:15:51AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > Alright, enough people are bothering me for 2.6.10 that we should probably > get it into sid. I've committed a bunch of bk backports to the svn 2.6.10 > k-s directory (small, obvious fixes for the most part); I'm going to aim > for

preparing 2.6.10

2005-01-04 Thread Andres Salomon
Alright, enough people are bothering me for 2.6.10 that we should probably get it into sid. I've committed a bunch of bk backports to the svn 2.6.10 k-s directory (small, obvious fixes for the most part); I'm going to aim for uploading 2.6.10 into NEW either Wed. or Thurs. unless anyone has object