On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:19:10AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:42:48 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > [...] > >> The IRQ-after-swsusp-awakening patch (attached). Needed to make > >> some hardware drivers work after resuming from swsusp (Source: > >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > >> > >> The swsusp-speedup-patch (attached) - makes the swsusp in kernel a lot > >> faster on suspending (source: > >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > > > > We don't ship with swsusp enabled so this is just a waste of time. > > I think enough people have been asking for swsusp that it may be worth > trying to enable it again, and seeing how/if it breaks for people. I > wouldn't want to do it for 2.6.10-1, though; rather, let's get 2.6.10-1 > out there, and if that proves stable, we can start doing some more > experimental stuff w/ 2.6.10-2. > > Ditto for the misrouted-irq patch.
I personally have been using swsup to good effect with 2.6.10-rc1 and rc2. -- Horms -> 2c worth
