On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:15:51AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > Alright, enough people are bothering me for 2.6.10 that we should probably > get it into sid. I've committed a bunch of bk backports to the svn 2.6.10 > k-s directory (small, obvious fixes for the most part); I'm going to aim > for uploading 2.6.10 into NEW either Wed. or Thurs. unless anyone has > objections.
ia64-generic-no-smp.dpatch still needs a forward-port. drivers-scsi-generic_proc_info.dpatch should be dropped, but we need to make sure the kernelk-image packages depend on the latest initrd-tools btw, any reason your newly commited patches have leading numbersi n their patch names, unliked all the older patches?
