Sam Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 12:45 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
>> Daniel Baumann wrote:
>>> Sam Morris wrote:
Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand?
>>> Andres didn't say something about inclusion so far, only Kel. And Kel
>>> has a bouncing email address.
>>>
>> Sorry, that's m
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 12:45 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > Sam Morris wrote:
> >> Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand?
> >
> > Andres didn't say something about inclusion so far, only Kel. And Kel
> > has a bouncing email address.
> >
>
> Sorry, that's my fault; he h
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Sam Morris wrote:
>> Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand?
>
> Andres didn't say something about inclusion so far, only Kel. And Kel
> has a bouncing email address.
>
Sorry, that's my fault; he has updated packages for me to sponsor, but I
just haven't had time.
Anyway
Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seemed that this bug was being ignored on the pretext that the
> submitter's email address didn't work, which seems like a stupid reason
> not to include ndiswrapper in linux-modules-2.6-extra. I am just a user
> who wants to reduce the amount of pain he
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 12:50 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Sam Morris wrote:
> > Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand?
>
> Andres didn't say something about inclusion so far, only Kel. And Kel
> has a bouncing email address.
Right, but who is Kel--just the bug submitter? I would have submitted
Sam Morris wrote:
> Right, but who is Kel--just the bug submitter? I would have submitted a
> bug myself if I didn't notice this one already in the BTS.
Kel is co-maintainer of ndiswrapper and uses his broken email address
not just for reporting bugs but also to maintain his packages.
> It seemed
Sam Morris wrote:
> Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand?
Andres didn't say something about inclusion so far, only Kel. And Kel
has a bouncing email address.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 12:25 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Sam Morris wrote:
> > Re-opening, I would like to see binary packages of the ndiswrapper
> > modules in Debian.
>
> if the mainainer re-appears, i'll add ndiswrapper.
Andreas is MIA? Or do I misunderstand?
--
Sam Morris
http://robots.or
Sam Morris wrote:
> Re-opening, I would like to see binary packages of the ndiswrapper
> modules in Debian.
if the mainainer re-appears, i'll add ndiswrapper.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.p
reopen 400752 !
thanks
Re-opening, I would like to see binary packages of the ndiswrapper
modules in Debian.
--
Sam Morris
http://robots.org.uk/
PGP key id 1024D/5EA01078
3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B219 7FDB 5EA0 1078
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
maximilian attems wrote:
> it would be cool if random bug reporter,
> would have the deceny to _accept_ mail.
indeed :/
> closing due to unresponsive bug reporter.
fine with me.
kel, please reopen and set the owner accordingly to a working address if
you ask for inclusion.
--
Address:
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>
> ndiswrapper was already heavily discussed if it belongs to main or to
> contrib. The result is, that it's still in main. I do not think that it
> is the task of the kernel-team to judge about this /on the
> conglomeration package/.
wtf!?
and who get
maximilian attems wrote:
> and who gets *stupid* unparsable oops reports!
...which gets reassigned to the source-package.
> yes i disagree.
> the only use of ndiswrapper to run proprietary junk.
> so it's a clear fit to contrib.
feel free to re-start discussion where ever it is appropriate (but
Hi,
ndiswrapper was already heavily discussed if it belongs to main or to
contrib. The result is, that it's still in main. I do not think that it
is the task of the kernel-team to judge about this /on the
conglomeration package/. If the kernel-team disagrees about having
ndiswrapper beeing in main
On Friday 01 December 2006 21:30, Bastian Blank wrote:
> tags 400752 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:17:20AM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> > Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Please consider including ndiswrapper. Patch attached, based
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 400752 moreinfo
Bug#400752: linux-modules-extra-2.6: include ndiswrapper
Tags were: patch
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
tags 400752 moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:17:20AM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Please consider including ndiswrapper. Patch attached, based on existing
> support for spca5xx.
There are reports that ndiswrapper
Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please consider including ndiswrapper. Patch attached, based on existing
support for spca5xx.
Thanks, Kel.
diff -Nrup linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.18.orig/defines
linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.18/defines
--- linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6
18 matches
Mail list logo
