On Sat, 06 Jan 2007, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > ndiswrapper was already heavily discussed if it belongs to main or to > contrib. The result is, that it's still in main. I do not think that it > is the task of the kernel-team to judge about this /on the > conglomeration package/. wtf!? and who gets *stupid* unparsable oops reports!
> If the kernel-team disagrees about having > ndiswrapper beeing in main, someones has to re-continue the discussion > on the ndiswrapper source package, otherwise it shall be accepted that > it is in main, including the packages build out of a conglomeration package. yes i disagree. the only use of ndiswrapper to run proprietary junk. so it's a clear fit to contrib. > Therefore, if ndiswrapper does indeed work with 4k stack, im going to > add ndiswrapper to l-m-e-2.6. If it doesn't and will not in the > forseeable near future, Kel should please close this bug. > > Regards, > Daniel -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
