maximilian attems wrote: > and who gets *stupid* unparsable oops reports!
...which gets reassigned to the source-package. > yes i disagree. > the only use of ndiswrapper to run proprietary junk. > so it's a clear fit to contrib. feel free to re-start discussion where ever it is appropriate (but here, it's definitely not). independently of that, it doesn't matter from the kernel team point of view, it its in the l-m-e-2.6 or if it is in the l-m-c-2.6 package. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
