Can we please stop this my filesystem is better than yours crap?
As far as the debian kernel packages are concerned we should support
all filesystems supported upstream unless there's a very good reason.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
On 09/02/05 09:45:18AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> First: this discussion is pointless and always ends in people promoting
> their favorite toy (only).
>
True, but since most people don't have enough time or resources to do
exhaustive testing of every possible option, anecdotal evidence from
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 09:45:18AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
[...]
>
> First: this discussion is pointless and always ends in people promoting
> their favorite toy (only).
Pretty much.
>
> So how do you know they are reliable? For me, XFS began eating my files
> after 1.5years of usage, and t
#include
* Jim Crilly [Thu, Sep 01 2005, 07:02:26PM]:
> > Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but
> > I don't think there's a consensus that ReiserFS is much worse than the
> > others? I personally find it useful because it doesn't have any
> > limitation on the nu
On 08/30/05 06:29:02PM +0200, David Madore wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Appart from my general feeling that no one should use Reiser FS,
>
> Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but
> I don't think there's a consensus that Reiser
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:29:02PM +0200, David Madore wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Appart from my general feeling that no one should use Reiser FS,
>
> Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but
> I don't think there's a consensus
David Madore wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Appart from my general feeling that no one should use Reiser FS,
>
> Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but
> I don't think there's a consensus that ReiserFS is much worse than the
> ot
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Appart from my general feeling that no one should use Reiser FS,
Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but
I don't think there's a consensus that ReiserFS is much worse than the
others? I personally find it usef
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 12:39:27PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:47:41PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > I am also still wondering if there is any interest in
> > consolodating the entirel fs configuration, which seems
> > a bit of a mess right now - e.g. compare the EXT2/3 optio
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:47:41PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> I am also still wondering if there is any interest in
> consolodating the entirel fs configuration, which seems
> a bit of a mess right now - e.g. compare the EXT2/3 options
> for different arches and flavours.
Yes it is.
You can try to use
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:58:35PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:24:48AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:51:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > Here are the patches that I forgot to attatch to my previous post.
> >
> > You removed the ASFS entries. Did you
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:24:48AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:51:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Here are the patches that I forgot to attatch to my previous post.
>
> You removed the ASFS entries. Did you used non-debian sources?
Perhaps there were some patches missing
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:51:53PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Here are the patches that I forgot to attatch to my previous post.
You removed the ASFS entries. Did you used non-debian sources?
Bastian
--
Those who hate and fight must stop themselves -- otherwise it is not stopped.
--
Here are the patches that I forgot to attatch to my previous post.
--
Horms
diff --exclude .svn -ruN a/debian/arch/alpha/config a/debian/arch/alpha/config
--- a/debian/arch/alpha/config 2005-08-30 11:45:58.0 +0900
+++ a/debian/arch/alpha/config 2005-08-30 13:02:05.0 +0900
@@ -26
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 324202 +patch
Bug#324202: include ReiserFS ACL support in 2.6.12 kernel
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
tag 324202 +patch
thanks
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 11:40:59PM +0200, David Madore wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-386
> Version: 2.6.12-5
> Severity: minor
> Tag: patch sid
>
> Please include the following config snippet on all archs:
>
> CONFIG_REISERFS_PROC_INFO=y
> CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XAT
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-386
Version: 2.6.12-5
Severity: minor
Tag: patch sid
Please include the following config snippet on all archs:
CONFIG_REISERFS_PROC_INFO=y
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XATTR=y
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_SECURITY=y
(at least the last three lines). It ma
17 matches
Mail list logo
