tag 324202 +patch thanks On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 11:40:59PM +0200, David Madore wrote: > Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-386 > Version: 2.6.12-5 > Severity: minor > Tag: patch sid > > Please include the following config snippet on all archs: > > CONFIG_REISERFS_PROC_INFO=y > CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XATTR=y > CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y > CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_SECURITY=y > > (at least the last three lines). It makes no sense to have ACL > support for JFS and ext2/ext3 (and XFS, of course) but not ReiserFS... > Especially since the options in question are included in powerpc, > ia64, hppa and sparc architectures - please turn them on everywhere!
[ If I posted here before, ignore that post, mail is confusing today ] Appart from my general feeling that no one should use Reiser FS, this seems perfectly reasonable. I have used split-config to generate updated configs and attached the patches. Hopefully the other kernel team people don't object to this, in which case I'll put it in the tree. default.patch This is basically what happens if you run split-config and then exit menuconfig without making any changes. In a nutshell, cleaning up inconsistencies in the configs. reiser.patch This is the result of turning the options above on in the 386 flavour of i386 and then asking for them to be applied globally. This seems to have worked, noting that arm, powerpc/noconfig.apus and s390 don't have CONFIG_REISERFS_FS enabled at all. This seems reasonable, except fhr the s390 bit, I'm not sure about that. Also I noticed that there seems to be a lot off room for unifing the fs config across all arches and flavours. I'm happy to make this happen if there are no objections. Oh, and my patches are against branches/dist/sid/kernel/linux-2.6/ Waldi seems to have been rearanging SVN again. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
