On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:25:37AM +0900, Horms wrote:
>
> There was some discussion of cutting down on the number of flavours.
> It all centred around, is there any real benifit. For instance,
> it is conventional wisdom that 686 will run faster on a UP box than 686-smp,
> but for a typical workl
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:25:37AM +0900, Horms wrote:
> However, as its a performance issue, what is needed is numbers.
> I heard that Ubuntu were looking into it, but haven't heard
> anything of late.
I only heard something about a weird patch which noops the locks on
runtime.
Bastian
--
Is t
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 06:44:29PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> - Allow us to fix detection problems without to need a kernel upload;
As the modules checks against it own table, this is a noop.
> - Allow by arch specific modules;
The modules may specify that also.
> - Allow by kernel vers
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:03:46AM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 02:31:01 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:57:34PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
> >
> >> Speaking of kernel flavours (we weren't, but what the hey); is the plan
> >> still to reduce all o
On 10/31/05, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We are not using discover2 yet, but discover1, and i thought the way to the
> > future was to use hotplug only, as ubuntu did ?
>
> In installer itself, for sure. But discover2 has some important
> feature that cannot be satisfied by hotp
Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/31/05, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > We are not using discover2 yet, but discover1, and i thought the way to the
>> > future was to use hotplug only, as ubuntu did ?
>>
>> In installer itself, for sure. But discover2 has some imp
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:03:46AM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 02:31:01 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:57:34PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
> >
> >> Speaking of kernel flavours (we weren't, but what the hey); is the plan
> >> still to reduce all o
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 02:31:01 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:57:34PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
>
>> Speaking of kernel flavours (we weren't, but what the hey); is the plan
>> still to reduce all of the x86 flavours down to two: generic x86 and
>> generic x86-smp?
>
> "
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 10:57:30AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Marco Amadori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Alle 14:18, sabato 29 ottobre 2005, hai scritto:
>> >> Marco Amadori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> > If there is also a proposal that
* Anand Kumria wrote:
> I can recall quite a number of incident where i've moved a disk from
> an athlon k6 to k7 (and vice versa) and found random failures until
> I picked the right kernel package.
Hu? Running a k6 kernel on a k7 shouldn't be a problem.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:57:34PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:46:30 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 02:36:53PM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
> > As said, i think that the only way to solve this for debian-installer would
> > be
> > to follow up with m
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:46:30 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 02:36:53PM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
> As said, i think that the only way to solve this for debian-installer would be
> to follow up with my plan, and mandate a policy of all packaged modules to
> provide .debs and
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 10:57:30AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Marco Amadori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Alle 14:18, sabato 29 ottobre 2005, hai scritto:
> >> Marco Amadori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > If there is also a proposal that at install time scans through external
> >> > m
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 02:36:53PM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
> Alle 14:18, sabato 29 ottobre 2005, hai scritto:
> > Marco Amadori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > If there is also a proposal that at install time scans through external
> > > modules to find those needed by the host system I will
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:57:34PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:46:30 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 02:36:53PM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote:
>
> > As said, i think that the only way to solve this for debian-installer would
> > be
> > to follow up wi
Marco Amadori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alle 14:18, sabato 29 ottobre 2005, hai scritto:
>> Marco Amadori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > If there is also a proposal that at install time scans through external
>> > modules to find those needed by the host system I will be happier :-)
>>
>> Th
Alle 14:18, sabato 29 ottobre 2005, hai scritto:
> Marco Amadori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If there is also a proposal that at install time scans through external
> > modules to find those needed by the host system I will be happier :-)
>
> That can be one area where discover2 can work. It ha
Marco Amadori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If there is also a proposal that at install time scans through external
> modules to find those needed by the host system I will be happier :-)
That can be one area where discover2 can work. It has some good and
flexible enough database for it. We only
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 09:42:58AM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Sven Luther wrote:
> > but alpha, hppa and arm all three had commits fixing the FTBFS a few
> > hours after the upload, so as soon as we get confirmation of the
> > build success, we can do -2.
>
> Confirmed for alpha, 2.6.14-
Alle 08:06, sabato 29 ottobre 2005, Sven Luther ha scritto:
> Hello all,
>
> Well, as you may have noticed, we uploaded 2.6.14-1 to unstable yesterday,
Really Good Job, it's nearly incredible fast!
> Ok, let's finish with the next things to work on :
>
> - clear the external module situation. P
* Sven Luther wrote:
> but alpha, hppa and arm all three had commits fixing the FTBFS a few
> hours after the upload, so as soon as we get confirmation of the
> build success, we can do -2.
Confirmed for alpha, 2.6.14-2 builds fine.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hello all,
Well, as you may have noticed, we uploaded 2.6.14-1 to unstable yesterday, we
needed 6 hours from when i was made aware of the upstream release and the
moment it entered NEW, and missed dinstall only by a couple of hours, so the
packages are now in incoming and not unstable, we should c
22 matches
Mail list logo
