On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:57:34PM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote: > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:46:30 +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 02:36:53PM +0200, Marco Amadori wrote: > > As said, i think that the only way to solve this for debian-installer would > > be > > to follow up with my plan, and mandate a policy of all packaged modules to > > provide .debs and .udebs for all official kernel flavours. > Speaking of kernel flavours (we weren't, but what the hey); is the plan > still to reduce all of the x86 flavours down to two: generic x86 and > generic x86-smp? "Still"? When was this ever the plan? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
