On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 09:11:02PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> Could you update wheezy backports version of firmware-nonfree too (now at
> version 0.41 while jessie/sid has 0.43)?
bpo version is still 0.41
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
Could you update wheezy backports version of firmware-nonfree too (now at
version 0.41 while jessie/sid has 0.43)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 06:32:05PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Version: 3.9-1
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:19:56AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > It still does with 3.2 in stable, but not with 3.9 in testing.
>
> Closing with that version, then.
No such version (3.9-1) was uploaded
I think that initramfs-tools 0.110 fixes should go to sid/wheezy.
Or make kernels in experimental depend on this version or higher.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lis
When using squeeze system, with wheezy (backports) of kernel and firmware,
recently firmware-linux started to recommend intel-microcode and
amd64-microcode packages.
I think that intel-microcode recommends can be versioned, so that it prefers
reworked versions (1.20120606.1 or newer) instead of old
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:13:35PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 22:28:56 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > New image is up at
> > http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/linux-image-3.2.0-4.drm-amd64_3.2.34-1~jcristau.1_amd64.deb
> >
> > sha1sum is 1bbb6e4590e4f000739af89f30
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 01:54:51PM +0100, Ingo wrote:
> Since 2 weeks I an running kernel 3.4 from kernel.org. I used config from
> Debian's 3.4.4-1~experimental.1 with "make silentoldconfig" and accepted
> defaults fo 5 new items. This is a long term kernel as well and thus
> still maintained.
>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:28:56PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> New image is up at
> http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/linux-image-3.2.0-4.drm-amd64_3.2.34-1~jcristau.1_amd64.deb
>
> sha1sum is 1bbb6e4590e4f000739af89f3090ffc6bb9cb409.
> diff against svn at
> http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 03:59:02PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> amd64 debs aren't yet available from my mirror (ftp.fi.debian.org) for some
> reason, do they show up in other places?
nevermind, latest mirror update has it
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debi
amd64 debs aren't yet available from my mirror (ftp.fi.debian.org) for some
reason, do they show up in other places?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 02:39:29PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 07:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Source: linux
> > Version: 3.2.20-1
> >
> > Hi kernel maintainers,
> >
> > Gergely Nagy wrote:
> >
> > > reassign 679226 src:linux-2.6 3.2.20-1
> >
> > Several bugs see
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:03:02AM -0400, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
> On 07/01/2012 07:05 AM, Touko Korpela wrote:
> >> ...
> >> +if test "$post_2_6_38"; then
> >> + XZ="xz --check=crc32 -8"
> >> +else
> >> + XZ=f
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:01:47PM -0400, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
> The attached patch brings vmlinuz from about 13MB to about 9.5MB, which
> is well under the 12MB limit. Downside is that xz compressing is
> noticeably slower than currently used gzip, but decompressing speed
> difference is not noti
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:13:04PM +0200, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
> -- /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> md50 : active raid5 sda1[0] sdd1[3] sde1[5]
> 625137664 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/3] [UUU]
> bitmap: 1/3 pages [4KB], 65536K
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:13:04PM +0200, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.106
> Severity: critical
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> After patching my system 3 days ago it will not further boot up. The initramfs
> prompt comes before the
I think it would make sense to display note or news item at 'linux-2.6' PTS
page at http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/linux-2.6.html telling that source
package is now renamed to 'linux'.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:47:03PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Some hardware support; this can still be done after the freeze but the
> sooner the better:
>
> - [armhf] omapdrm driver
> - [x86] gma500 support for new chips
> - [x86] i915 improvements in Ivy Bridge support
> - radeon support for
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 04:40:25PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > --- debian/templates/control.source.in(revision 19077)
> > > +++ debian/templates/control.source.in(working copy)
> > > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> > > Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team
> > > Uploaders: Bastian Blank , Frederik Schü
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 04:58:42AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Here's what that change looks like:
>
> -$(BUILD_DIR)/linux-source-$(UPSTREAMVERSION).tar.bz2:
> SOURCE_DIR=$(BUILD_DIR)/source
> +define copy_source
> +rsync --delete --exclude debian --exclude .pc --exclude .svk --exclude .svn
>
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 02:21:28PM +0200, Camaleón wrote:
> 2012/6/1 Camaleón :
>
> > OTOH, I will try to reproduce the instability state with 3.2.16-1 over
> > the weekend and will comment the results here.
>
> Okay, I'm afraid the problem is still present in kernel 3.2.17-1 :-(
>
> Wireless wa
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:44:23PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> I don't know if it's regression or not but when I rebooted 3.2.18-1, kernel
> oopsed during shutdown (it wasn't logged). I don't remember that happened
> before.
False alarm, it wasn't kernel
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:34:07AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Touko Korpela wrote:
>
> > Here is log from 3.2.18-1 kernel with X125 laptop. WARNING is there.
> [...]
> > Linux version 3.2.0-2-686-pae (Debian 3.2.18-1)
> > (debian-kernel@lists.debia
Package: firmware-brcm80211
Version: 0.35
Severity: wishlist
Upstream repository has some new/updated firmwares available. Also it would
be good to ask if Broadcom has new firmwares available for wireless cards
(firmware-brcm80211).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debia
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 08:36:02AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Touko Korpela wrote:
>
> > This patch (?) causes possible regression.
> > On another laptop (Asus 1215B), that doesn't use encrypted wlan and didn't
> > have this warning bug, now when it'
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:34:10AM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> Patch works, warning is gone after couple of hours of use. I let you
> know if situation changes.
> This patch and ""INTERMEDIATE but not AMPDU" only when tracing" looks like
> good to have also in &q
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:07:51AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> Camaleón wrote:
>
> > Although kernel 3.3 still logs the trace (despite having applied all
> > of the suggested the patches), there's an overall stability
> > improvement in the wireless driver when compared to kernel 3.2.12
> >
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 02:30:24PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 03:55:56PM +0300, Markus Vuorio wrote:
> > >
> > > no error provided, command is meant to be also run as normal user
> > > thus assertion by report is invalid, closing.
> > >
> >
> > The resulting initramf
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:26:37AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 3.2.17-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream
>
> Dear Debian folks,
>
>
> the `brcmsmac` [1] module does not support IBSS [2] needed to create
> ad-hoc networks [3][4][5].
>
> This prevents for example
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 03:14:15PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> Another issue is source package. Shouldn't it be xz compressed (upstream
> tarballs are available also in xz)?
Apparently this requires converting source package to new 3.0 format.
It seems to have good and not-so-good
Binary packages built from linux-2.6 source are now xz compressed (or was
that reverted)?
What about kernel images (vmlinuz) and initramfs images?
Is it enabled only for some architectures (arm)?
Another issue is source package. Shouldn't it be xz compressed (upstream
tarballs are available also i
Patch works, warning is gone after couple of hours of use. I let you
know if situation changes.
This patch and ""INTERMEDIATE but not AMPDU" only when tracing" looks like
good to have also in "upstream" stable kernel.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:00:05PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Touko Korpela wrote:
>
> > It seems that brcmsmac is enabled by some Debian patch, that don't get
> > enabled when building from upstream 3.2.x git tree. It would make sense
> > to offer curren
Again failure :(
It seems that brcmsmac is enabled by some Debian patch, that don't get
enabled when building from upstream 3.2.x git tree. It would make sense
to offer current Debian kernel git tree also.
That kernel has this in dmesg:
[4.468517] b43-phy0: Broadcom 4313 WLAN found (core revisi
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 05:11:48PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> tags 672891 + upstream patch moreinfo
> quit
>
> Hi,
>
> Touko Korpela wrote:
>
> > Samsung X125 laptop. This kind of warning was logged. Also earlier
> > 3.2.x kernels do this.
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
Here is previous warning with 3.2.16-1.
[90251.832010] [ cut here ]
[90251.832040] WARNING: at
/build/buildd-linux-2.6_3.2.16-1-i386-xAlW9F/linux-2.6-3.2.16/debian/build/source_i386_none/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.c:823
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.17-1
Severity: normal
Samsung X125 laptop. This kind of warning was logged. Also earlier 3.2.x
kernels do this.
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 3.2.0-2-686-pae (Debian 3.2.17-1)
(debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian 4.6.3
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 03:30:14AM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 3.2.16-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Thanks for "brcmsmac: "INTERMEDIATE but not AMPDU" only when tracing" fix in
> 3.2.16-1. Kernel still prints some wlan errors, but
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.16-1
Severity: normal
Thanks for "brcmsmac: "INTERMEDIATE but not AMPDU" only when tracing" fix in
3.2.16-1. Kernel still prints some wlan errors, but they don't
cause major trouble in my light use. Still, maybe this can be fixed.
-- Package-specific info:
** Versi
Cpufrequtils homepage link (under kernel.org) doesn't seem to work anymore.
I found https://github.com/emagii/cpufrequtils
It says: "Clone of kernel.org cpufrequtils, until it is back in business"
Can it considered new home of cpufrequtils for now?
It has some changes after 008 too.
--
To UNSUBS
#hardware support
severity 654957 important
quit
Here is modified patch to add support for AMD Bulldozer (21) and Llano (18)
processors. I hope someone can check this and upload cpufrequtils.
--- debian/cpufrequtils.loadcpufreq.init.dist 2011-08-03 14:50:31.0 +0300
+++ debian/cpufrequtils.
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:59:30PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Touko Korpela schrieb am Saturday, den 28. April 2012:
>
> > Squeeze-backports is at version 0.99, while wheezy/sid has now 0.102
> That per se is no reason for a backport.
If backport is already available (like th
Squeeze-backports is at version 0.99, while wheezy/sid has now 0.102
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120428204732.GA11166@lisko
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 04:14:52AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 04:16 +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:30:04PM +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > > I think you should also add family 18 (AMD Fusion Llano).
> > > http://w
I'm seeing a lot of kernel log entries like this under wheezy kernels:
ieee80211 phy0: brcms_c_dotxstatus: INTERMEDIATE but not AMPDU
This patch should hide them:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/89512
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.or
Installer has also a bug report about this (#661069).
It would be good if Debian kernel radeon driver learned to fall back
sensibly if running on hardware where firmware is required.
Also installer should warn user about what happens if firmware is missing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:04:36PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Teodor MICU wrote:
>
> > I just tested this (linux image from stable-proposed-updates) and
> > there is no change: the console is fuzzy during boot.
>
> Great, thanks for testing. How about the second question --- is the
> radeon
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 07:37:51PM +0400, Boris Pek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > startx command launched LXDE (I have both KDE and LXDE) and it
> > > worked normally.
> >
> > Thanks --- this is a very useful detail. So probably non-accelarated
> > rendering works fine, and it is something in 3d codepath
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:23:47PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 February 2012 11:40:02 Michael Prokop wrote:
> > * David Baron [Wed Feb 15, 2012 at 10:49:53AM +0200]:
> > > --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> > > On attempted upgrade
> >
> > From which initramfs-tools
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 04:14:52AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 04:16 +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:30:04PM +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > > I think you should also add family 18 (AMD Fusion Llano).
> > > http://w
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:30:04PM +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
> I think you should also add family 18 (AMD Fusion Llano).
> http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16292
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 12:06:05AM -0600, Robert Keevil wrote:
> > Package: cpufrequtils
> >
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 09:33:28AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 19:02 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >> reassign 649448 src:linux-2.6 linux-2.6/3.0.0-3
> >> severity 649448 important
> >> retitle 649448 radeon (everg
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 01:41:17PM +0200, Touko Korpela wrote:
> Should current kernel Break cpufrequtils versions lower than 007-2 because of
> bug #636141?
Any comment on this? I think squeeze users (or others that still use 007-1)
using wheezy/sid kernel may have broken cpu frequency s
Should current kernel Break cpufrequtils versions lower than 007-2 because of
bug #636141?
I also asked someone to make cpufrequtils squeeze backport on
debian-backports@l.d.o
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Jort Koopmans wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 14:05 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> [..]
> > madduck called testing for experimental version of mdadm. where it can be
> > downloaded?
>
> My bad, I missed the initscripts package from
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:09:11PM +0200, Jort Koopmans wrote:
> Is there anything else I can do to triage this bug? I'd be happy to try
> any suggestions to get this bug solved (in a future release).
> Waiting for any response,
>
> Jort Koopmans
madduck called testing for experimental version of
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 10:51:46AM +0100, Ad L. wrote:
> (Re-sent to the correct address)
>
> I really should spend time on studying for an exam coming up in a few
> days, and reportbug doesn't seem to run as it should, or it secretly
> sent a mail twice. Tried it as normal user and as root, but r
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:29:06PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 09:57:05PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Nowadays we're supposed to trust the kernel to do it right, and your disk
> > should spin up only if it has crap firmware (unlik
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 09:57:05PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2011, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > I suspect that "-h" option that "halt" gets during poweroff is buggy and
> > shouldn't spin disks up that are already at sleep.
&
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:52:44PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 17:04 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > > [1] http://www.alsa-project.org/main/index.php/HDA_Analyzer
> >
> > Unfortunately, Alsa upstream support seems to be nonexistent lately. Nobody
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:16:34PM +0200, Johann Felix Soden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since I have a hardware failure now and have not reported this bug
> upstream yet, I would be glad, if you, Antony, could take care of
> this.
>
> For the same reason, I cannot say anything about ogg123.
>
> Some time
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:05:26PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:10:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (lkcl) reported bug
> > #636123, which then received a follow-up which is very clearly (to me)
>
> this guy is adding to much noise,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:47:24PM +0200, Valentijn Scholten wrote:
> After making some backups, I tried to upgrade the kernel again.
> Guess what? It just works now.
> The term.log section looks nothing like the one above.
> Also the old kernel has been retained.
Please use reply fuction when pos
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:48:24PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> valentijn, hi,
>
Your messages don't reach valentijn if you only send mail to bugnumber
address...people aren't automatically subscribed to bugs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:27:10AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> tags 638878 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Touko Korpela wrote:
> > Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
> > output? Maybe it can be added to "kernel version" string, uname -v
> &g
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:44:03PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> Touko Korpela wrote:
>
> >>> Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname
> >>> output? Maybe it can be added to "kernel version" string,
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Would it be possible to report Debian kernel version in uname output? Maybe it
can be added to "kernel version" string, uname -v (now it's "#1 SMP Wed Aug 17
05:07:22 UTC 2011".
This information is present in /proc/version and could be in un
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39-3
Severity: important
Plug/unplug (interface disconnected)/plug cycle with Huawei E1552 USB 3G modem
(also emulates cdrom) sometimes causes kernel oops.
Wlan was disabled at crash time.
Oops message is at end of this message.
-- Package-specific info:
** Versio
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:19:21AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 17:17 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > I noticed that firmware-nonfree (0.30) has updated brcm80211 firmware that
> > contains "unspecified stability fixes".
> > Maybe updated firmw
I noticed that firmware-nonfree (0.30) has updated brcm80211 firmware that
contains "unspecified stability fixes".
Maybe updated firmware-nonfree should go to stable updates too?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
This Alpha bug is present in 2.6.21-1. Is it still in 2.6.22?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe you could take a look for reportbug script code example from
glibc. They added script for preventing bogus bug reports against their
package. Could same be added to kernel package telling it's bug in
yaird and not in kernel?
In my opinion you should keep support for alternate initrd genera
Is fix for this freeze included in recent kernels?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
reopen 434597
severity 434597 grave
#reassigning to yaird, you shouldn't close bugs too fast
reassign 434597 yaird 0.0.12-20
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Why did you downgrade this to normal?
And didn't you have policy of a bug to be at least important severity
for a fix to be included in stable kernel update.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pump is buggy, please try dhcp3-client instead.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reopen 430887
thanks
>DISTRIB_ID=Debian
>DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer"
>DISTRIB_RELEASE="4.0 (installer build 20070127-03:50)"
>X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom
>umame -a: Linux portatel 2.6.18-3-486 #1 Sun Dec 10 18:57:11 UTC 2006
i686 unknown
Your CD isn't "official" etch 4.0 but
Tim Dijkstra wrote:
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You should fix your mail system not to send quoted-printable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this patch still needed in 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12 or 2.6.20-1 ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
78 matches
Mail list logo
