reassign 749014 src:linux
thanks
[Ben Hutchings]
> Your mail server seems to be broken.
Right you are, thanks for the extra step to contact me via the BTS.
> This should be assigned to src:linux not a binary package.
Also correct, I just didn't know offhand whether there was a way to
assign t
Package: linux-image-3.15-rc5-amd64
Version: 3.15~rc5-1~exp1
Severity: wishlist
CONFIG_USB_UAS (USB Attached SCSI) is apparently now solidly supported:
a patchset arrived in the 3.15 window to rewrite it and remove it from
CONFIG_BROKEN. Please add this to kernels that support USB 3.0 (it may
wor
[Brad Spengler]
> Frankly it makes more sense for me to offer .debs myself than to deal
> with a bureaucracy and non-standard kernel in Debian. It contains
> who-knows-what extra code, and I doubt anyone looked at any of it to
> see if it allows for some way to leak information I prevent against
[Goswin von Brederlow]
> Where the relevant patches added to binutils and gcc for this?
See for yourself: http://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
ine in question, I'm
just glad I had a serial console through a Portmaster, since it was
unable to start sshd.)
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
27; on the kernel command line, so that the initramfs does
not have to detect that either.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
;t work!??
No, sorry, I meant: this is the consequence of the bug, if you do not
apply the workaround (to menu.lst or whatever).
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92o
Severity: normal
ext3 includes mount option 'data={ordered,writeback,journal}'.
However, it also has a restriction that you cannot change the 'data='
parameter with 'remount'. Therefore, you have to pass the correct one
at initial mount time, even though th
[Manoj Srivastava]
> a) How to configure which one of competing boot-loader scripts get run,
> if more than one boot loaders are installed
> b) Which initramfs generator gets run, if we have more than one
> installed.
I'd vote for handling this with alternatives:
/etc/kernel.d/bootl
[Manoj Srivastava]
> Given this official statement, I also suggest that the GR
> proposal is moot, since the proposer himself believes that the kernel
> modules in question can not be distributed by Debian legally.
There are a few firmware files which are sourceless but explicitly
_not_
[W. Borgert]
> - Is it relevant, whether Python is compiled on a system with 2.6
> or 2.4 kernel? If so, how can I find out on which kernel the
> Debian package has been built?
Might or might not be relevant - depends on whether the python build
scripts attempt to detect the kernel capabilit
11 matches
Mail list logo
