[ {debian-kernel,debian-boot,debian-release}@d.o are in Bcc so they
can track follow up emails at debian-arm ML if interested. ]
Dear fellow developers,
Debian Installer no longer produces daily builds for this platform:
- https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/
Debian Linux kernel packages a
Hello Anibal,
El ds., 4 de set. 2021, 9:33, Anibal Monsalve Salazar
va escriure:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021, 21:42 Salvatore Bonaccorso
> wrote:
>
>> Control: forcemerge 917706 991631
>>
>> Hi Hector,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 12:21:47PM +0200, Hector
Package: src:nfs-utils
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Hello,
nfs-utils package is quite old, even in SID, what are the plans for
this package? Could it be updated to a more recent upstream version?
Regards,
--
Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.
Hello,
Ampere donated some machines for the ARM ports, those machines need
some fixes for USB, I have built a test stable kernel with it and John
has validated it was working. Do you think we could land these fixes
in the buster
branch?
John has put it patches at: https://github.com/jvillal-amp
Hello,
I would like to support Debian Linux kernel team by doing kernel
package uploads.
Initially, I would like to attempt timely (weekly or bi-weekly, it
has not been discussed yet) updates for Debian Linux kernel package in
SID and see how that works.
In anycase, I would like to give a
ards
> # used by upstream to build usbip
> autoconf ,
> automake ,
> --
> 2.10.2
>
--
Hector Oron
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:39:15PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 01:13:28PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > Package: linux
> > Version: 4.6.4-1
> > X-Debbugs-CC: st...@einval.com, woo...@wookware.org, zheng...@linaro.org
> >
> > Upstream co
mozilla-js).
FTR, this is an issue DSA is having booting arm64 machine donated by
Gigabyte MR30-AR1. I am currently building a kernel, to get a d-i image
and test this proposed fix.
I'll follow up with the results.
Regards,
--
Hector Oron
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello again,
2016-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Antoine Beaupré :
> On 2016-05-31 16:01:46, Hector Oron wrote:
>> El 31 may. 2016 9:56 p. m., "Antoine Beaupré" escribió:
>>> cp: impossible d'évaluer « /boot/initrd.img-4.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 »: Aucun
>> fichier
Hello,
2016-05-31 22:12 GMT+02:00 Antoine Beaupré :
> Also, it seems impossible to rebuild the backport from source:
>
> [1060]anarcat@angela:dist$ sudo DIST=jessie ARCH=amd64 cowbuilder --build
> linux_4.5.4-1~bpo8+1.dsc
[...]
> build-dependencies of the package being currently built.
> Depend
Hello,
El 31 may. 2016 9:56 p. m., "Antoine Beaupré" escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I still see this problem in debian jessie right now. I can't install the
> linux kernel backport.
>
> cp: impossible d'évaluer « /boot/initrd.img-4.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 »: Aucun
fichier ou dossier de ce type
>
> The initrd is
Hello Bastien,
(Adding CC to Debian kernel maints)
>> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES
>> wrote:
>> > I could donate a NAS under armel that is not yet ported to debian (but
>> > debian run on it [1]).
>> >
>> > I will not donate the hardrive, but I could do if needed the seri
Hello Ben,
2013/11/11 Ben Hutchings :
> As the Linux kernel has continued to grow, in Linux 3.12 the iop32x and
> ixp4xx kernel images have again exceeded the size limits for the target
> machines.
>
> [Note, all figures here are based on the emdebian gcc-4.7 cross-compiler
> whereas we'll actuall
Hello,
2013/10/20 Cyril Brulebois :
> Ian Campbell (2013-10-19):
[...]
> I'm not sure about ancina, but at least hasse had disc issues. Not sure
> what the status is, but the right contact would usually be $arch@buildd,
> added.
Thanks for heads-up! I'll have a look during this week.
Cheers,
--
Hello,
2013/6/27 Ben Hutchings :
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:39:15PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:13:48PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
>> > Ben Hutchings writes:
>> > btw, iop32x is used on n2100 which are used on buildd/porter boxes. If
>> > we stop supporting it, I
Hello,
2013/6/27 Luca Filipozzi :
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:27:54PM +, David Power wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:56:51AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
>> > My main concern is that having a single node as buildd without another
>> > for development purposes means that we don't have easy
Hello,
2013/6/7 Moritz Muehlenhoff :
> Hector,
> this hasn't landed in current kernel.org git, did you submit it upstream?
No, I did not submit it upstream, also it seems to be incomplete, and
it misses armhf architecture. Please, allow me few days to work on it
and re-submit updated patch to De
Hello,
2013/4/26 Raphael Hertzog :
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Hector Oron wrote:
>> * DSA hat: The machine shall not be a debian.org machine, so DSA could
>> export accounts if requested.
>> * Buildd hat: The machine shall not be used to run buildd software to
>> build of
Hello,
2013/4/12 Raphael Hertzog :
> OffensiveSecurity owns a Calxeda Highbank cluster of ARM machines[1] and is
> willing to dedicate one of the nodes to Debian.
Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we cannot
reject the offer, it makes it very interesting as a playground
machi
Hello,
2013/4/2 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu :
> Then, the two candidates have come armmp and armv7.
> Which do you like?
> if there is no other opinions, I would want to decide on armmp.
armmp ++
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Package: linux-tools
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Please upload new upstream release of linux-tools to Debian experimental,
that way linux-kbuild-3.8 will be provided and linux-headers-3.8-trunk-* will
be installable.
Regards
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers unstable
Hello,
2012/7/2 Ben Hutchings :
> linux is a big package and slow to build on some buildds. It looks like
> 'linux-2.6' was restricted to be built on the faster machines, and
> 'linux' should now be restricted in the same way.
JFYI, this issue has been dealt with. argento and arcadelt had 'linux
Hello,
2011/11/23 Matthias Klose :
> On 11/19/2011 11:42 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> (Later it should be increased
>> further, and eventually i386 should be reduced to a partial architecture
>> that may be installed on amd64 systems.) This would allow the use of
>> optimisations and new instruct
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Hello,
I was not sure where to send this patch, better here to Debian community for
review.
I found a bit annoying that using upstream deb-pkg target does not allow me
to create
proper Debian packages when cross compiling, so I have cre
Hello Ben,
2011/9/29 Ben Hutchings :
> I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-5 to unstable later this
> week. This will include stable update 3.0.5 and may require an ABI
> change (I haven't checked yet). It should fix the FTBFS on some
> architectures in 3.0.0-4 (but other changes may intr
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.1.0-rc6
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Hello,
While playing with sbuild to build packages on armhf buildd running an
upstream patched kernel for i.MX53 LOCO boards (next armhf build daemons).
I have hit a deadlock and oops on LVM, so I think it is worth it to
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:53:54AM +0200, Michael Ott wrote:
> Setting up linux-image-3.0.0-1-orion5x (3.0.0-3) ...
> Running depmod.
> Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d.
> run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools 3.0.0-1-orion5x
> /boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-1-orion5x
> update-
Hello,
2011/6/27 Ben Hutchings :
>> While I am not entirely sure, I think proper way to add hooks would be:
>> * one hook triggered by kernel scripts creating uImage from vmlinuz
>> post package installation.
>> * and other hook triggered by kernel scripts creating uInitrd after
>> initrd-
Hello,
flash-kernel is a debian-installer ARM utility which is able to
produce bootable kernel and initramfs (aka initrd) images. It converts
vmlinuz and initrd images to bootable format which the bootloader
understands, most common use is to generate uImage and uInitrd for
U-Boot booloader.
Hi,
2011/6/22 Sebastian Reichel :
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:32:39PM +0000, Hector Oron wrote:
>> I suspect
>> [ 184.049530] WARNING: at
>> /home/zumbi/linux-2.6-2.6.39/debian/build/source_armhf_none/kernel/irq/handle.c:130
>> handle_irq_event_percpu+0xf8/0x1f
Hello,
2011/6/11 Hector Oron :
> 2011/6/7 Sebastian Reichel :
>> I (re)moved the armhf/config changes. Here is the new version:
>> http://pkg-n900.alioth.debian.org/kernel/linux-2.6-omap-v2.patch
> Patch included into patched kernel version at debian-ports.org armhf
> po
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0~rc2
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hello,
Your package fails to build from source on armel architecture:
/build/buildd-linux-2.6_3.0.0~rc2-1~experimental.1-armel-hju5OO/linux-2.6-3.0.0~rc2/debian/build/source_armel_none/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c:
In
Hello,
2011/6/7 Sebastian Reichel :
> I (re)moved the armhf/config changes. Here is the new version:
> http://pkg-n900.alioth.debian.org/kernel/linux-2.6-omap-v2.patch
Patch included into patched kernel version at debian-ports.org armhf
port, so we can test it easily.
You might want to add flash
Hi,
2011/6/5 Sebastian Reichel :
>> +CONFIG_CPU_V7=y
>>
>> This symbol is not needed as it should be selected by ARCH symbols, i.e.
>> http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.39/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig#L31
>>
>> If some platform being ARMv7 does not select it I would consider it a
>> bug on kernel con
rmlinux.simtec.co.uk/kautobuild/2.6.39-git11/iop32x_defconfig/zimage.log
The following patch fixes the build:
>From ace377ade6dce2e3cca400281f8be60398f0c04c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hector Oron
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 19:24:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] plat-iop: fixes fail to build from so
Hello,
2011/6/5 Ben Hutchings :
> On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 22:09 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>> [0] http://pkg-n900.alioth.debian.org/kernel/linux-2.6-omap.patch
>> sha256 24958a765f5291c3a34edd31aeac2ec2a1756d17c2b11389b639ea19d68734be
> Could you review this, please? Especially the changes t
Hi,
2011/5/9 Debian Ports Archive Maintainer :
> Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team
> Uploader: Hector Oron Martinez (zumbi)
> Host: leda.debian.net
> Accepted: linux-2.6_2.6.38-4+armhf.1_armhf.changes
I just want to comment that this upload has been done to 'unreleased'
at d
Hi,
2011/5/8 Hector Oron :
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 01:14:11AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
>> Here is a proposed patch against trunk for fixing this bug.
>> Patch was written initial by Arnaud Patard, later changed
>> by Uwe Kleine-König.
>
> I have
Hi,
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 01:14:11AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> Here is a proposed patch against trunk for fixing this bug.
> Patch was written initial by Arnaud Patard, later changed
> by Uwe Kleine-König.
I have built a kernel with the following patch and I have been able
to
Hi,
2011/5/8 Martin Michlmayr :
> * Hector Oron [2011-05-08 12:19]:
>> Machine ID stuff cannot go in kernel package.
> Right. And that's the reason why I don't understand why you'd want to
> put an uImage into the kernel package. We just need to take the
> uI
Hi,
2011/5/8 Martin Michlmayr :
> * Hector Oron [2011-05-08 11:27]:
>> I think machine_ID and kernel_format (uImage|vmlinuz|vmlinux) could
>> easily be fields in the architecture config files (defines).
> How does this help? We ship one kernel image for a platform and
Hi,
2011/5/8 Martin Michlmayr :
> * Hector Oron [2011-05-08 08:10]:
>> Adding support for U-Boot image format ('uImage' kernel target) in
>> official kernel packages seem to me the right thing to do, it would
> This was suggested before but there are some reas
Package: debian-kernel-handbook
Version: 1.0.10
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hello,
While looking to DebianBug#550584, I wonder why do we need to carry
with the burden of maintaining hardcoded stuff for some architectures,
while part of it is maintained by Linux kernel upstream developers
Hi Ben,
2011/5/8 Ben Hutchings :
>> I think it would be interesting to have one armel/armhf common config,
>> but I have not yet looked into that.
> We do. The Kconfig files for armhf are armel/config, armhf/config.
Yes, I was thinking on something like a toplevel arm[el,hf] config. We
could h
,mipsel] Disabled CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU and CONFIG_DRM_RADEON_KMS.
* [mips/octeon] Disabled CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU and CONFIG_PM.
- -- maximilian attems Tue, 01 May 2011 14:36:33 +0100
+ [ Hector Oron ]
+ * rtc-mc13xxx.c: bugfix rtc-mc13xxx.c lockup on armhf.
+Thanks to Arnaud Patard, Uw
Hi,
2011/5/5 Arnaud Patard :
> Martin Michlmayr writes:
>> Here are some outstanding bugs/tasks regarding the ARM kernels:
>> #604013 base: "ls -al" on armel inside loopback mounted ISO image failes
>> with -1 ENOMEM
>> Nobody has been able to reproduce and the submitter doesn't respond.
>> Ma
Hi,
2011/5/2 Ben Hutchings :
> This was due to a binutils bug (#623964) which is supposed to be fixed
> in binutils 2.21.51.20110421-1. Please ensure that the buildds are
> upgraded and then tell wanna-build to retry.
Thanks, it has been given back.
Best regards,
--
Héctor Orón -.. . -... .
Hi,
2011/4/18 Hector Oron :
> Thanks very much for the review, I'll submit a patch with changes later on.
Vagrant has tested a newer config which it is known to work.
I just point to the commits at the git repository we have created to
help us work. Let me know if you prefer to paste t
Hi,
2011/4/18 Ben Hutchings :
> On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 11:39 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
>> ##
>> ## file: arch/arm/Kconfig
>> ##
>> ## choice: ARM system type
>> # CONFIG_ARCH_REALVIEW is not set
>> ## end choice
>> CONFIG_AEABI=y
>> CONFIG_OA
he top level config or selected by other symbols.
Thanks and best regards,
-- Hector Oron
P.S.-
config: (it is mainly a copy of armel one)
##
## file: arch/arm/Kconfig
##
## choice: ARM system type
# CONFIG_ARCH_REALVIEW is not set
## end choice
CONFIG_AEABI=y
CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT=y
##
## file: ar
Hi,
2011/4/15 Bastian Blank :
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:51:29AM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
>> I propose this patch which enables basic functionality of Efika MX nettop
>> which it is currently in mainline 2.6.38.
>
> The configs looks strange.
> - Why is network
+
+++ linux-2.6-2.6.38.armhf/debian//changelog2011-04-14 22:42:12.0
+
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+linux-2.6 (2.6.38-3+armhf.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Add armhf support: enables efikamx nettop basic support.
+
+ -- Hector Oron Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:48:16 +
+
linux-2.6 (2.6.38-3) uns
Hello,
2011/4/14 Martin Michlmayr :
> I don't have time to properly take care of ARM kernels in Debian
> anymore. I would like to nominate Arnaud Patard (rtp on IRC) as the
> new maintainer for the ARM platform (both armel and the new armhf).
> Arnaud has done a lot of work on ARM upstream and ha
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the review.
2011/4/12 Martin Michlmayr :
> * Hector Oron [2011-04-12 09:55]:
>> I got some work-in-progress patches avaible at:
>> http://emdebian.org/~zumbi/efika/MainLineKernel/patches/0001-Add-armhf-support.patch
>
> config.mx5 defines CONFIG_ARC
Hello Martin,
2011/4/12 Martin Michlmayr :
> * Hector Oron [2011-04-05 23:35]:
>> Index: debian/config/armhf/config
>> ===
>> Index: debian
Hi again,
2011/4/6 Hector Oron :
> Is there any reason to not change default compiler to gcc-4.5?
hppa gcc-4.5 fails to build from source, not sure if that is an issue.
--
Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.
"Our Sun unleashes tremendous flares expel
Hello,
Debian userland has recently changed to gcc-4.5 as default compiler.
Debian kernel land it is still using gcc-4.4.
Is there any reason to not change default compiler to gcc-4.5?
Best regards,
--
Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.
"Our Sun unleashe
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hello,
Please consider the following patch which adds armhf support against svn info:
URL: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/sid/linux-2.6
Repository Root: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel
Repository UUID: 510b9475-24dd-031
Hello,
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 06:21:36PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> As a compromise, we could add a kernel config file for MV78xx0 to the
> Debian kernel package but not build this flavour by Debian. This way,
> you'd just need to add one line to the config file and rebuild the
> kernel.
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.38-2
Severity: serious
Hello,
Your package fails to build on armel autobuilders,
LD arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux
OBJCOPY arch/arm/boot/zImage
Kernel: arch/arm/boot/zImage is ready
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 1761 modules
Hello,
2010/11/29 Sebastian Reichel :
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 06:17:59PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> * Sebastian Reichel [2010-11-23 09:42]:
>> However, personally I'd like to see explicit support for some OMAP
>> devices in Debian installer, otherwise I don't see a lot of value
>> in pr
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.36-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
Hello,
Later linux kernel on experimental FTBFS
Full buildlog at:
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=linux-2.6;ver=2.6.36-1~experimental.1;arch=armel;stamp=1288326292
-- System Information:
Debian Rele
such package? An alternative it is to upload a
source package which build depends on linux-source and generates such package.
Kind Regards,
-- Hector Oron
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.2
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: armel (armv5tel)
Ker
63 matches
Mail list logo
