linux-signed-amd64_6.1.90+1~bpo11+1_source.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-signed-amd64_6.1.90+1~bpo11+1.dsc
linux-signed-amd64_6.1.90+1~bpo11+1.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
binary:acpi-modules-6.1.0-0.deb11.21-amd64-di is NEW.
binary:ata-modules-6.1.0-0.deb11.21-amd64-di is NEW.
binary:btrfs-modules-6.1.0-0.deb11.21-amd64-di is NEW.
binary:cdrom-core-modules-6.1.0-0.deb11.21-amd64-di is NEW.
binary:crc-modules-6.1.0-0.deb11.21-amd64-di is NEW.
binary:crypto-dm-modules
binary:ata-modules-6.1.0-0.deb11.21-arm64-di is NEW.
binary:btrfs-modules-6.1.0-0.deb11.21-arm64-di is NEW.
binary:cdrom-core-modules-6.1.0-0.deb11.21-arm64-di is NEW.
binary:crc-modules-6.1.0-0.deb11.21-arm64-di is NEW.
binary:crypto-dm-modules-6.1.0-0.deb11.21-arm64-di is NEW.
binary:crypto-modul
linux-signed-arm64_6.1.90+1~bpo11+1_source.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-signed-arm64_6.1.90+1~bpo11+1.dsc
linux-signed-arm64_6.1.90+1~bpo11+1.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source linux
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'linux'
Limit currently set to 'source':'linux'
> tags 1068365 + pending
Bug #1068365 [src:linux] util-linux: FTBFS on mips64el in
lsfd/mkfds-multiplexing-pselect
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.1.90-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I recently upgraded a machine from bullseye to bookworm. While this was
successful, I started noticing a kernel warning a few hours after every boot.
The kernel warning happens only once per-boot. Seems to be an issue
On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 10:57:03 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 12:43:33AM -0800, John Johansen wrote:
> > On 12/30/23 20:24, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 16:44 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > > John, did you had a chance to wor
Package: src:linux
Version: 6.1.90-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: xm0...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
I've installed Debian 12.5.0 via net-install on a Hyper-V 2016 (2024/05 updates
installed) machine. The installation went well, but as soon as the machine
tried to boot up with the 6.1.0-21 ker
On Tue, 21 May 2024 at 16:41, Diederik de Haas wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 21 May 2024 16:57:40 CEST Gedalya wrote:
> > On 5/21/24 10:55 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > This has always been enabled by default, even in stable.
> >
> > What is the meaning of this line in the changelog for 6.9.0-1, and why
On 5/21/24 10:55 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> This has always been enabled by default, even in stable.
What is the meaning of this line in the changelog for 6.9.0-1, and why does it
correlate with an actual change in behavior?
Quote:
* Enable output with colors on terminals
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 14:00:34 +0200
Source: linux-signed-arm64
Architecture: source
Version: 6.7.12+1~bpo12+1
Distribution: bookworm-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian K
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 14:00:34 +0200
Source: linux-signed-amd64
Architecture: source
Version: 6.7.12+1~bpo12+1
Distribution: bookworm-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian K
Processing control commands:
> close -1 wontfix
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> close -1
Bug #1071582 [iproute2] ip: Poor color choice for dark background
Marked Bug as done
--
1071582: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071582
Debian Bug Tracking System
Con
Control: close -1 wontfix
Control: close -1
On Tue, 21 May 2024 at 15:51, Gedalya wrote:
>
> Package: iproute2
> Version: 6.9.0-1
> Severity: minor
>
> Hello,
>
> The newly enabled colored output is rather hard to read on dark backgrounds,
> especially the deep blue color used for IPv6 addresses
Package: iproute2
Version: 6.9.0-1
Severity: minor
Hello,
The newly enabled colored output is rather hard to read on dark backgrounds,
especially the deep blue color used for IPv6 addresses.
Setting COLORFGBG=";0" as the manpage suggests helps a lot.
Consider a scenario when this command is us
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 16:52:31 +0200
Source: linux
Architecture: source
Version: 6.1.90-1~bpo11+1
Distribution: bullseye-backports
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team
Cha
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 22:27:12 +
Source: linux-signed-i386
Architecture: source
Version: 6.1.76+1~bpo11+1
Distribution: bullseye-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ke
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 22:27:12 +
Source: linux-signed-arm64
Architecture: source
Version: 6.1.76+1~bpo11+1
Distribution: bullseye-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian K
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 22:27:12 +
Source: linux-signed-amd64
Architecture: source
Version: 6.1.76+1~bpo11+1
Distribution: bullseye-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian K
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1071420 https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZkxZT0J-z0GYvfy8@gardel-login/
Bug #1071420 [src:linux] linux-image-6.8.9-1-amd64: cannot mount btrfs root
partition
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZkxZT0J-z0GYvfy8@
iproute2_6.9.0-1~bpo12+1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
iproute2_6.9.0-1~bpo12+1.dsc
iproute2_6.9.0-1~bpo12+1.debian.tar.xz
iproute2_6.9.0-1~bpo12+1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Mapping bookworm-backports to stable-backports.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 13:05:38 +0100
Source: iproute2
Architecture: source
Version: 6.9.0-1~bpo12+1
Distribution: bookworm-backports
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1:2.6.2-4
Package: linux-image-6.1.0-21-amd64
Version: 6.1.90-1
During our tests of Proxmox VE with Debian NFS server as a shared storage we've
noticed
that nfsd sometimes becomes unresponsive and it's necessary to reboot the
server.
Probably the same error
TWIMC, the problem systemd is facing due to the removal of a obsolete
option (that might or might not lead to the problem this bug is about)
was finally properly reported upstream now – and from the first reply is
sounds like a workaround is likely to be expected:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZkxZT
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 r8125-dkms
Bug #1071559 [linux-headers-6.8.9-amd64] linux-headers-6.8.9-amd64: error
creating r8125 module with dkms
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-headers-6.8.9-amd64' to 'r8125-dkms'.
No longer marked as found in versions linux/6.8.9-1.
Ignoring re
Control: reassign -1 r8125-dkms
On Tuesday, 21 May 2024 10:41:54 CEST Pierpaolo Toniolo wrote:
> Was installing the linux-image-6.8.9-amd64 and it's fellow linux-
> headers-6.8.9-headers.
> At modules creation with dkms I got an error building module r8125 (package
> r8125-dkms)
Which is a proble
Package: linux-headers-6.8.9-amd64
Version: 6.8.9-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: tecnosegu...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I'm working on Debian sid, amd64.
Was installing the linux-image-6.8.9-amd64 and it's fellow linux-
headers-6.8.9-headers.
At modules crea
> So we are back at tp_smapi being the culprit, not the kernel.
>
> I'm closing this bug here, as all points to tp_smapi as the culprit,
> both for the freeze and the installation problems.
I opened this bug report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071520
and it turns out th
Dear Salvatore,
I've already started bisecting. It will take some time. Usually the bug
appears after a few hours, unfortunately I am not able to trigger it
faster. So, if the bug appears, I can step forward easily, but if not,
its hard to decide if it is still present and simply just have not
29 matches
Mail list logo
