This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
s390: Add pgste to ptep_modify_prot_start()
to the 3.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
s390-add-pgs
I've made the following changes in linux in experimental:
* udeb: Clean up configuration:
- Move i2c-algo-bit to i2c-modules
- Remove redundant control file overrides
- [s390] Use symlinks to follow s390x configuration
- [sparc64] Use symlinks to follow sparc configuration
-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 711888 711895
Bug #711888 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [src:linux]
linux-image-3.9-1-amd64: Problem with cooling when running CPU intensive tasks
Bug #711895 [src:linux] linux-image-3.9-1-amd64: Problem with cooling when
running CPU intensi
Your message dated Tue, 11 Jun 2013 02:07:35 +0100
with message-id <1370912855.15470.3.ca...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#711888: linux-image-3.9-1-amd64: Problem with cooling
when running CPU intensive tasks
has caused the Debian Bug report #711888,
regarding linux-image-3
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.112
Followup-For: Bug #707286
I'm experiencing similar issue with linux 3.8 or 3.9. 3.6 and prior
worked. None of the disk devices are present when lvm or cryptosetup
runs. The problem seems to be directly related with the wait_for_udev
function called by pre_m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Monday 10 June 20:03:15 UTC 2013
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: http://packages.qa.debian.org/mlt";>mlt
> tags 709249 + pending
Bug #709249
I noticed in the last reply to this bug that the MegaRAID Storage Manager
is suspect. I'm running Ubuntu with a 3.5.0-32 kernel and see this same
behavior when using the MegaCli64 command line tool. I run this tool
through cron each hour to grab the logs from the RAID controller and put
them into s
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #706603 (http://bugs.debian.org/706603)
# Bug title: Inspiron N5010: freeze on adjus
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #572537 (http://bugs.debian.org/572537)
# Bug title: udev spins on drm device
# * h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.41-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
my system has a PCI multi IO card (2 serial, 1 parallel port) with the NetMos
9835 chipset. The PCI card worked well in squeeze. After upgarde to wheezy the
parallel port is not longer detected. When a print job is queued and
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.9.4-1
Severity: normal
When running regular tasks, fans run at regular level and mantain CPU
temperature at regular leves, i.e: http://foolcontrol.org/img/temp47.png
However, if I do CPU intensive tasks such as if I play Half Life 2 on Steam, or
even watch a video on
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 09:09:24PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Commit 52f36be0f4e2 's390/pgtable: Fix check for pgste/storage key
> handling', which was commit b56433cb782d upstream, added a use of
> pgste to ptep_modify_prot_start(), but this variable does not exist.
> In mainline, pgste was add
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 17:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings
> Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 21:07:31 +0100
>
> > All architectures must implement IRQ functions. Since various
> > dependencies on !S390 were removed, there are various drivers that can
> > be selected but will fai
Ben,
I would like to backport patches into 3.9 (support for new hardware and
critical bugs). Can I do it now? Or when is the right time to do it?
Thanks,
Sarvesh
-Original Message-
From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:b...@decadent.org.uk]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 9:27 AM
To: Bandi,Sarve
15 matches
Mail list logo