Hi kernel team,
Last week I stumbled upon the current text in the release-notes about
kernel/udev upgrade. If we don't update it, it says (among other things)
the text below [1]. I believe this text is obsolete and was ONLY meant
for the lenny to squeeze update. Do you agree that this part should
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
> Control: retitle -1 Kernel soft-lockup when running doxygen
>
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:16:06PM -0400, Olivier Diotte wrote:
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> I am pretty sure that running doxygen (high load) is related to this
>> locku
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #704767 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6]
linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: kernel crashes when task block for more than 120
seconds
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #704767 to the same values
previously set
> retitle -1 Kernel
Control: reopen -1
Control: retitle -1 Kernel soft-lockup when running doxygen
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:16:06PM -0400, Olivier Diotte wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I am pretty sure that running doxygen (high load) is related to this
> lockup, but based on your comment, maybe I am wrong.
So you're actua
Hi Ben,
I am pretty sure that running doxygen (high load) is related to this
lockup, but based on your comment, maybe I am wrong.
I will try to run doxygen again during the weekend and will see if it
locked up monday.
To date, I have run doxygen overnight twice and both times the
computer became
Your message dated Fri, 5 Apr 2013 18:57:35 +0100
with message-id <20130405175735.gh2...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#704767: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: kernel crashes
when task block for more than 120 seconds
has caused the Debian Bug report #704767,
regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-a
Your message dated Fri, 5 Apr 2013 17:42:46 +0100
with message-id <20130405164246.gg2...@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#704690: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686:
xserver-xorg-video-fbdev says (EE)open /dev/fb0: No such file or directory
has caused the Debian Bug report #704690,
regarding linux-
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-48squeeze1
Severity: important
Tags: squeeze
Here is an example of what appears in kern.log when the system crashes:
6433 Apr 4 00:35:13 Debianosaur kernel: [57842.080076] INFO: task
doxygen:22882 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
6434 Apr 4 00:35:13 Debianos
Hi,
Tested with 3.8.y from expiremental. These are the results:
1. Ethernet works as expected without error messages, even with
laptop-mode-tools controlling ethernet
2. Errors from e1000e on shutdown:
Apr 5 19:20:03 laptop shutdown[4223]: shutting down for system reboot
Apr 5 19:20:05 laptop
Hi,
Narrowed down the issue to laptop-mode-tools. If ethernet control is
disabled the issue is solved.
Tried with kernel 3.2.41-2, now available in testing, same results.
Apr 5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [7.928034] [ cut here
]
Apr 5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [7.92806
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.41-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
A: I don't know.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
A: At that time, I
On 04/04/2013 23:23, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 05:57:05PM +0100, Philip wrote:
>> Package: linux-2.6
>> Version: 2.6.32-48squeeze1
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Unable to start Xorg using fbdev driver with this kernel.
>> The same xorg installation wor
Source: linux
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: tails-...@boum.org
Hi,
TL;DR -> please enable enable SECURITY and SECURITY_YAMA_STACKED.
as the maintainers of the Debian Linux kernel surely know, the Yama
LSM "collects a number of system-wide DAC security protections that
are not handled by the c
On 2013-04-05 10:06, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Roger Heflin wrote:
>
>> lspci look like this for the controller:
>> SATA controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device 9230 (rev 10)
>>
>> 4pt sata3.0 6gbit or is yours a different one?
> Mine looks slightly different
On Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 10:13:05 +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> Hello Linux RAID and ATA people,
>
> I've managed to find a configuration on my home desktop where a
> particular RAID array is barely usable.
>
> You can find my initial report at:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Roger Heflin wrote:
> lspci look like this for the controller:
> SATA controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device 9230 (rev 10)
>
> 4pt sata3.0 6gbit or is yours a different one?
Mine looks slightly different (included somewhere in my mail), but
should be a d
Dear all,
Just another information about the bug.
I've installed the sid kernel:
apt-cache policy linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64
linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64:
Installé : 3.2.41-2
Candidat : 3.2.41-2
Table de version :
*** 3.2.41-2 0
90 http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/ sid/main amd64 Packa
17 matches
Mail list logo
