Hi,

Narrowed down the issue to laptop-mode-tools. If ethernet control is
disabled the issue is solved.
Tried with kernel 3.2.41-2, now available in testing, same results.

Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928034] ------------[ cut here
]------------
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928063] WARNING: at
/build/buildd-linux_3.2.41-2-amd64-Wvc92F/linux-3.2.41/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c:5333
__e1000_shutdown+0x6f/0x3ea [e1000e]()
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928067] Hardware name: 7465CTO
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928069] Modules linked in:
ip6table_filter ip6_tables ebtable_nat ebtables ipt_MASQUERADE iptable_nat
nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack ipt_REJECT
xt_CHECKSUM iptable_mangle xt_tcpudp iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables tun
bridge stp parport_pc ppdev lp parport bnep rfcomm uinput ext2 tp_smapi(O)
thinkpad_ec(O) loop kvm_intel kvm snd_hda_codec_conexant arc4 thinkpad_acpi
nvram snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm snd_page_alloc snd_seq
snd_seq_device snd_timer snd iwlwifi mac80211 psmouse iTCO_wdt btusb
serio_raw bluetooth pcspkr cfg80211 coretemp i2c_i801 iTCO_vendor_support
evdev soundcore rfkill i915 battery ac power_supply drm_kms_helper drm
acpi_cpufreq wmi mperf video i2c_algo_bit i2c_core button processor ext4
crc16 jbd2 mbcache dm_mod microcode sg sd_mod crc_t10dif ahci libahci
thermal thermal_sys uhci_hcd ata_generic libata scsi_mod ehci_hcd e1000e
usbcore usb_common [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928140] Pid: 11, comm: kworker/0:1
Tainted: G           O 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 Debian 3.2.41-2
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928142] Call Trace:
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928149]  [<ffffffff81046a55>] ?
warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0x8c
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928160]  [<ffffffffa007cfc8>] ?
__e1000_shutdown+0x6f/0x3ea [e1000e]
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928171]  [<ffffffffa007d374>] ?
e1000_runtime_suspend+0x31/0x39 [e1000e]
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928177]  [<ffffffff811c5ce8>] ?
pci_pm_runtime_suspend+0x43/0xd6
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928181]  [<ffffffff811c5ca5>] ?
pci_legacy_suspend_late+0xbd/0xbd
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928186]  [<ffffffff81257662>] ?
__rpm_callback+0x2c/0x50
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928189]  [<ffffffff81257bc1>] ?
rpm_suspend+0x271/0x401
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928194]  [<ffffffff8103981a>] ?
finish_task_switch+0x4e/0xb9
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928197]  [<ffffffff812588d7>] ?
pm_runtime_work+0x65/0x7e
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928202]  [<ffffffff8105b225>] ?
process_one_work+0x161/0x264
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928205]  [<ffffffff8105c1e6>] ?
worker_thread+0xc2/0x145
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928209]  [<ffffffff8105c124>] ?
manage_workers.isra.25+0x15b/0x15b
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928213]  [<ffffffff8105f321>] ?
kthread+0x76/0x7e
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928217]  [<ffffffff81354ab4>] ?
kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928222]  [<ffffffff8105f2ab>] ?
kthread_worker_fn+0x139/0x139
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928225]  [<ffffffff81354ab0>] ?
gs_change+0x13/0x13
Apr  5 18:51:02 laptop kernel: [    7.928227] ---[ end trace
2ee513d3cae1946f ]---

Will let you know what happens with kernel 3.8.y once i upgrade.

Ilan


On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:50 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ilan Cohen wrote:
>
> > have done some more research, disabled the wol in pm-utils and disabled
> > ethernet control in laptop-mode-tools
> > and the problem has gone away.
>
> There was an e1000e fix in __e1000e_shutdown() in 3.2.41.  Can you
> reproduce this with 3.2.41-2 from unstable?  (If not, the fix will be
> coming to wheezy soon and we can close the bug.)
>
> If 3.2.41-2 produces the same symptoms, can you reproduce them with
> 3.8.y from experimental?  (If not, we can try to find the fix and
> apply it to wheezy.)
>
> If 3.8.y produces the same symptoms, please send a summary of what
> you have tried and what happened to the upstream developers at
> e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net, cc-ing either me or this bug log so
> we can track it.  Hopefully they will have ideas for tracking it down
> further.
>
> Thanks and hope that helps,
> Jonathan
>



-- 
Ilan Cohen

Reply via email to