On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:53:28 -0500 (EST), peter.meng wrote:
>
> HI
>
> I'm newbie on Debian .
> I install Debian 6.0.4(squeeze) on Dell E6410 .
> I just compile kernel as following step bu met the issue .
>
> 1. aptitude install fakeroot kernel-package linux-source-2.6
> 2. cd /usr/src/linux-sou
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:21:24 -0600
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> Anyway, I'll send any further questions to the upstream report[1].
> It will be nice if we can figure this one out.
>
Well, I got a new flat-screen and hook it up, and it seems to work with
both cards in the machine.
Here are the p
Hi Jonathan!
On 24 February 2012 18:28, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> [...]
> Found in version 3.2.4-1
> Fixed in version 3.2.6-1
> [...] upgrading to the version from sid and rebooting will fix it.
I did. Thanks a lot for a tranquil problem resolving!
Best Regards!
KAcper
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 07:56:37PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> The out-of-tree build is broken in 'make deb-pkg'. The
> header checks and the header install works on the source and
> not on the object tree.
> While fixing this also replace the direct 'make' invocations
> with the $MAKE variable to
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 06:29:27AM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:49:50AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 17:38 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > For user-mode Linux the other packages are not required. So
> > > only build the package with the linux-i
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:45:21AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 17:38 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > The Link to the kernel header files in the debian packages
> > point to the original build directory. This is a bad choice
> > if the packages were installed on a different ma
Package: linux-tools-3.2
Version: 3.2.1-2
Severity: normal
Hi!
perf report does not show source code lines (annotation) for some
binaries with separate debug information if those build-id's have been
cached in perf's build-id cache. This is true for at least those
packages whose debug symbols are
> tried at least 5 different versions. I have almost completely stopped
> using hibernate (suspend only) on my system and have not seen the problem
> in a long time and for my system at least, hibernate seems to be related
I never thought it was a firmware issue before, so I never paid any attent
[Cc list trimmed]
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 15:03 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:55:32PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:36:38PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > -kernel, -boot - were there any plans for a final kernel and/or d-i
> > > upload for l
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # fixed in 3.2.7 (drm/i915: Force explicit bpp selection for
> # intel_dp_link_required)
> tags 661112 + fixed-upstream pending
Bug #661112 [linux-2.6] Resume from suspend does not fully turn on laptop screen
Added tag(s) pending and fixed-upstrea
On 2012-02-24 20:44 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 08:15:09PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> Short summary for readers new to the bug: boot hangs with i386 systemd
>> and an x86_64 kernel.
>
> Care to explain why it hangs and not dies?
Here is Thomas Meyer's explanation fr
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:54:39PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > (But why hasn't this been spotted on sparc or powerpc already,
> > where 32-bit userland on 64-bit kernel is the normal case?)
>
> __u64 is 64-bit aligned on those arches in 32-bit mode.
>
> http://thre
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 07:50:05PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 08:15:09PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> [...]
> > Thankfully this problem has now been communicated to Linus himself, and
> > he agreed that it should be fixed in the kernel.
> Of course it should. A shame tha
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> (But why hasn't this been spotted on sparc or powerpc already,
> where 32-bit userland on 64-bit kernel is the normal case?)
__u64 is 64-bit aligned on those arches in 32-bit mode.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1255890
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ke
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 08:15:09PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
[...]
> Thankfully this problem has now been communicated to Linus himself, and
> he agreed that it should be fixed in the kernel.
Of course it should. A shame that some kernel maintainers think
they don't have to care about 32-bit com
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 633423 linux-2.6/3.2.6-1
Bug #633423 [linux-2.6] autofs4 interface is broken between x86 and x86_64
Bug Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.2.6-1.
> tags 633423 + upstream
Bug #633423 [linux-2.6] autofs4 interface is broken between x86 a
found 633423 linux-2.6/3.2.6-1
tags 633423 + upstream
# broken interface introduced in v2.6.17-rc1~444
# amd64 kernel image on i386 introduced in 2.6.18.dfsg.1-10
found 633423 linux-2.6/2.6.18.dfsg.1-10
forwarded 633423
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1256405/focus=1256966
quit
Sven Jo
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 08:15:09PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Short summary for readers new to the bug: boot hangs with i386 systemd
> and an x86_64 kernel.
Care to explain why it hangs and not dies?
Bastian
--
Conquest is easy. Control is not.
-- Kirk, "Mirror, Mirror", sta
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 633423 linux-2.6
Bug #633423 [systemd] systemd: boot fails on kernel / userland mismatch
Bug reassigned from package 'systemd' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions systemd/29-1.
> retitle 633423 autofs4 interface is b
reassign 633423 linux-2.6
retitle 633423 autofs4 interface is broken between x86 and x86_64
affects 633423 systemd
thanks
Short summary for readers new to the bug: boot hangs with i386 systemd
and an x86_64 kernel.
On 2011-10-15 21:51 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> It seems that somebody who is
Hi Kacper,
Kacper Perschke wrote:
> I have the same problem since upgrading from 3.1.5 to 3.2.0.
[...]
> Kernel is
> linux-image-3.2.0-1-686-pae:
> Installed: 3.2.4-1
> Candidate: 3.2.4-1
> Version table:
> 3.2.6-1 0
> 600 http://ftp.pl.debian.org/debian/ sid/main i386 Packages
The problem broke the entire system overnight before I could get an
outage window in which to reboot. Besides the afpd and smbd processes
previously reported, cfagent processes had also begun to hang in 'D',
and while I didn't notice them in 'D' state along with the several
hundred other stuck proc
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-41
Severity: normal
Attempts to do QoS (CBQ using tc) show tell-tale signs of
interrupt mitigation at work. Bandwidth fluctates and is
not measured properly.
I have set all applicable settings via ethtool at 0, I have
also passed the relevant intel-style param
Ben Hutchings wrote (24 Feb 2012 16:06:16 GMT) :
> Where can I find the patch?
Kees and Ubuntu AppArmor developers: can you please confirm the
patches that the Debian kernel team should consider for supporting the
AppArmor "legacy interface" would be the ones found in the
kernel-patches/$LATEST/ d
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-41
Severity: normal
iwl wifi hangs on heavy traffic. Mounting an nfs server via wifi
and untarring linux kernel gives a reproducible hang 1 out of 4
times or so.
At the same time if the traffic is light it can work for days
with no problem.
-- Package-specific
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 16:16 +0100, intrig...@debian.org wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 3.2.6-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: upstream
>
> Hi,
>
> we now have AppArmor enabled in the Debian kernels. This is great.
> Thank you for enabling it. This made it possible to start an
> effort [1] t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 661154 with 661151
Bug #661154 [apparmor-utils] apparmor-utils: aa-genprof is unusable
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 661154: 661151
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
661
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 661153 with 661151
Bug #661153 [apparmor-utils] apparmor-utils: aa-status is unusable
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 661153: 661151
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
6611
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 653592 with 661151
Bug #653592 [apparmor] apparmor: kernel needs apparmor 2.4 compatibility
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 653592: 661151
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.6-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Hi,
we now have AppArmor enabled in the Debian kernels. This is great.
Thank you for enabling it. This made it possible to start an
effort [1] towards having some kind of minimal AppArmor support
in Wheezy.
One of the major th
HI
I'm newbie on Debian .
I install Debian 6.0.4(squeeze) on Dell E6410 .
I just compile kernel as following step bu met the issue .
1. aptitude install fakeroot kernel-package linux-source-2.6
2. cd /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.32
3. copy /boot/config-2.6.32-5-686 to /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.32/.c
El 2012-02-24 a las 03:22 -0600, Jonathan Nieder escribió:
> # [1]
> forwarded 637813
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.driver-project.devel/22925/focus=23712
> quit
>
> Hi Camaleón,
>
> Just noticed your message at the URL above[1]. Note that Linux
> developers (just like me) tend
On Пн., 2012-02-13 at 07:08 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> What documentation did you use
> when installing and can you imagine a relevant place that a note about
> the need for firmware would be useful? What documentation did you use
> after installation to track d
S. G. wrote:
> alsamixer offers no mute knob on the master channel with kernel 3.2.6, see
> below.
[...]
> With kernel 3.1.8 there is a mute knob on the master channel.
Oh, good find. I should have noticed that the 'Master Playback
Switch' had disappeared in your alsactl output.
> How to proce
Hi
alsamixer offers no mute knob on the master channel with kernel 3.2.6, see
below.
┌ AlsaMixer v1.0.24.2 ─┐
│ Card: HDA Intel F1: Help │
│ Chip: Conexant CX20561 (Hermosa)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 661112 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42263
Bug #661112 [linux-2.6] Resume from suspend does not fully turn on laptop screen
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42263'.
> # regress
forwarded 661112 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42263
# regression
severity 661112 important
tags 661112 + patch upstream
quit
Hi Enrico,
Enrico Zini wrote:
> since version 3.2.0, when I resume from suspend the laptop screen
> backlight turns on, but the screen contents remain all
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.6-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
since version 3.2.0, when I resume from suspend the laptop screen
backlight turns on, but the screen contents remain all black. Other
monitors connected to the system wake up fine.
This bit of log from resume contains a relevant error:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # [1]
> forwarded 637813
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.driver-project.devel/22925/focus=23712
Bug #637813 [linux-2.6] Multimedia card reader outputs weird messages
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://thread.gmane.org/gman
# [1]
forwarded 637813
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.driver-project.devel/22925/focus=23712
quit
Hi Camaleón,
Just noticed your message at the URL above[1]. Note that Linux
developers (just like me) tend to be so phenomenally lazy or busy that
they do not subscribe to the mailing
40 matches
Mail list logo
