Ben Hutchings writes:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 08:57:18PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> rleigh writes:
> [...]
>> > tmpfs filesystems are different; here they /do/ differ in the sense that
>> > /run, /run/lock, /lib/init/rw etc. /are/ separate unique instances of
>> > tmpfs. Here, it m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 626601 linux-2.6 2.6.38-2
Bug #626601 [plymouth] plymouth: Kernel null pointer deference at boot time
Bug reassigned from package 'plymouth' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions plymouth/0.8.3-18.
Bug #626601 [linux-2
reassign 626601 linux-2.6 2.6.38-2
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 18:07:57 +0200, Nicolas VINOT wrote:
> Package: plymouth
> Version: 0.8.3-18+b1
> Severity: normal
>
> At boot time, kernel displays a null pointer dereference error on screen,
> instead of display manager (kdm in my case).
> This NPD is
Just a little update:
> Sync problems and lagging seems gone once I pass the options
> "i8042.nomux" to the kernel.
This is true for the synaptics touchpad, but it causes a terrible problem:
I started using Linux on this laptop since I started with Linux in
2008 with Ubuntu 8.04 based on the 2.6
Hi all,
I have to tell, that ALL kernels higher than version *-2.6.32-5-amd64
show this bug.
This means, also ALL livefilesystems are not usable.
I dicovered this bug i.e. in Backtrack5.
Regards
Hans
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
On Tue, 10 May 2011 16:35:40 -0700
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:11:00PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > There were two more follow on commits in stable related to this.
> > I recommend merging 2.6.38.6 which includes these.
>
> The problem still exists in the current 2.
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-31
Severity: normal
Hi,
We are experiencing the following problem on a number of machines using
2.6.32-5-amd64_2.6.32-31. The machines are used for virtual machine hosting and
have a number of LUNs exported from an FC-connected SAN connected to them via a
multip
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 624702 + pending
Bug #624702 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs doesn't honor
setting of BOOTDIR when searching for config-... files
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Hi,
>> >> > As mentioned by Jan, the device contains a RT3572
>> >> > chipset. Its entry
>> >> > could moved into the section for known RT35XX devices (i.e.
>> >> > "#ifdef
>> >> > CONFIG_RT2800USB_RT35XX") as an alternative.
>> >> >
>> >> > Geoff
>> >>
>> >> This has already been done:
>> >> ht
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 09:17 +0200, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> > As mentioned by Jan, the device contains a RT3572
> >> > chipset. Its entry
> >> > could moved into the section for known RT35XX devices (i.e.
> >> > "#ifdef
> >> > CONFIG_RT2800USB_RT35XX") as an alternative.
> >> >
> >> > Ge
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 14:53:45 +0200
with message-id <20110513125345.ga15...@stro.at>
and subject line Re: /usr/sbin/update-initramfs: update-initramfs edits
/etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/cryptroot
has caused the Debian Bug report #481104,
regarding /usr/sbin/update-initramfs: update-i
Hello everyone,
we just uploaded initramfs-tools release 0.99 "scarpe rotte e pur bisogna andar"
to Debian/unstable on this lovely Friday the 13th.
Users will most notably notice /run usage and xz support.
update-initramfs now has enhanced linux-2.6 hook scripts support,
so it no longer has to in
Accepted:
initramfs-tools_0.99.dsc
to main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.99.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.99.tar.gz
to main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.99.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.99_all.deb
to main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.99_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
i
initramfs-tools_0.99_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
initramfs-tools_0.99.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.99.tar.gz
initramfs-tools_0.99_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#626446: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #626446,
regarding initramfs-tools: [Patch] Option to enable xz compression for initrd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#625224: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #625224,
regarding xhci-hcd has the wrong module name
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#621803: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #621803,
regarding Add support for /run directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#620924: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #620924,
regarding Please drop dead usplash code
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#619670: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #619670,
regarding initramfs-tools: make robust against libraries only runtime-linkable
due to /etc/ld.so.conf*
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#612633: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #612633,
regarding initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs creates non working initramfs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#611046: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #611046,
regarding misleading message in verbose mode (gzip not found, using gzip)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#609964: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #609964,
regarding use blkid to correctly set UUID for RESUME
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#606806: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #606806,
regarding initramfs-tools: Handling of numeric root= arguments is not
udev-friendly
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#603858: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #603858,
regarding Mount options for proc conflict with /etc/fstab breaking
/etc/init.d/mountall.sh
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#603903: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #603903,
regarding initramfs-tools: Documentation for modules=list in initramfs.conf is
unclear
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#596742: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #596742,
regarding initramfs-tools: netconsole loaded too early
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#594189: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #594189,
regarding initramfs-tools: environment variable to disable run_bootloader
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#506540: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #506540,
regarding initramfs-tools - Always dereferences symlinks
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#502792: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #502792,
regarding initramfs-tools: mkinitramfs-kpkg ignores UMASK setting
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#501969: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #501969,
regarding upgrade-reports: Etch-Lenny dist-upgrade Dell PE6850 doesn't boot
past initramfs
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#454934: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #454934,
regarding /usr/share/man/man8/mkinitramfs-kpkg.8.gz: Grammatical error in
mkinitramfs(8): It's
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Fri, 13 May 2011 12:32:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#338405: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #338405,
regarding initramfs-tools: Duplicate files and inadequate use of busybox.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
* maximilian attems [2011-05-12 11:53:25]:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:08:10PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:33:31AM +, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 04:43:06PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi, Ben,
> > > > >
>
Sorry, my bad. I thought it was already in stable, instead it is in
stable-proposed. Thank you!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1305280184.9411.5.ca
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 10:20 +0100, Tiago Sousa wrote:
> I see most kernels are fixed, including linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-686.
> But linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 is missing (currently in version
> 2.6.32-31)! Do you plan to fix it? Thanks.
I'm not sure where you get this info, both packages come
I see most kernels are fixed, including linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-686.
But linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 is missing (currently in version
2.6.32-31)! Do you plan to fix it? Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:25 -0700, Walter Goldens wrote:
>> > As mentioned by Jan, the device contains a RT3572
>> > chipset. Its entry
>> > could moved into the section for known RT35XX devices (i.e.
>> > "#ifdef
>> > CONFIG_RT2800USB_RT35X
Hi,
>> > As mentioned by Jan, the device contains a RT3572
>> > chipset. Its entry
>> > could moved into the section for known RT35XX devices (i.e.
>> > "#ifdef
>> > CONFIG_RT2800USB_RT35XX") as an alternative.
>> >
>> > Geoff
>>
>> This has already been done:
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/k
38 matches
Mail list logo
