Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> writes:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 08:57:18PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> rleigh <rle...@codelibre.net> writes:
> [...]
>> > tmpfs filesystems are different; here they /do/ differ in the sense that
>> > /run, /run/lock, /lib/init/rw etc. /are/ separate unique instances of
>> > tmpfs. Here, it might make sense to give them a name other than "none"
>> > or "tmpfs" in order to distinguish between them--that is to say, the
>> > tmpfs instance, rather than the mountpoint. So names such as "run",
>> > "runlock", would provide a unique key for /etc/fstab in addition to the
>> > mountpoint. But this is mostly cosmetic, and if we do make such a
>> > change we'll need to ensure that it's coordinated between initscripts
>> > and initramfs-tools.
>>
>> It really doesn't matter what it is as long as it is consitent. Given
>> that /run and /run/lock aren't yet in use in Debian now would be the
>> time to pick a name and then stick with it. Using "run" and "runlock"
>> sounds good, go with that.
> [...]
>
> It does matter, as this is not just a matter for initramfs-tools and
> initscripts. We also need to agree with systemd and that is cross-
> distribution.
>
> Ben.
So what is everyone else using?
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87pqnm3wcg.fsf@frosties.localnet
