Hi, >> >> > As mentioned by Jan, the device contains a RT3572 >> >> > chipset. Its entry >> >> > could moved into the section for known RT35XX devices (i.e. >> >> > "#ifdef >> >> > CONFIG_RT2800USB_RT35XX") as an alternative. >> >> > >> >> > Geoff >> >> >> >> This has already been done: >> >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/ivd/rt2x00.git;a=commitdiff;h=ce2919c9fffe2aa52f9c3e327176d03764dbf9b5 >> > >> > That's all very well, but that isn't going to get into a stable release >> > for another 3 months! Device ID updates that don't require new >> > supporting code should be sent upstream straight away (and cc'd to >> > sta...@kernel.org). >> >> The patch has been send upstream, it has been in wireless-next-2.6.git >> since April 19... >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-next-2.6.git;a=commit;h=ce2919c9fffe2aa52f9c3e327176d03764dbf9b5 >> The patch depends on the RT53xx support patch which was also intented >> for 2.6.40. > > What is it, RT35XX or RT53XX?!
Oh sorry, RT35xx in this case, but basically the rest of the reply still applies. Both chipsets series have the same experimental state. Ivo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktinpgw2jmt-ukyrw5i2puqxmr3l...@mail.gmail.com
