Processed: tagging 606096

2010-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 606096 + pending Bug #606096 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: Please reset CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_SGE to upstream default Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processi

Bug#606096: linux-2.6: Please reset CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_SGE to upstream default

2010-12-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 12:22 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Severity: normal > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Debian is deviating from the upstream default for CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_SGE > This confuses users and makes upstream bug reporting more difficult > than

Re: Debian libata transition (bug in initramfs-tools?)

2010-12-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 12:28 -0800, Gordon Farquharson wrote: > Hi Ben > > Thanks for the prompt reply. > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:06, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:42:30AM -0800, Gordon Farquharson wrote: > >> (I'm sending this email to debian-kernel because the Debian k

Processed: tagging 605450

2010-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 605450 + pending Bug #605450 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Please support and update multitouch driver of Macbookpro 7,1. Added tag(s) pending. > End of m

Bug#605450: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Please support and update multitouch driver of Macbookpro 7,1.

2010-12-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 23:16 +0100, mike dentifrice wrote: > > > > I confirmed that I made the linux-2.6 package which did this patch > > > > applied, and a problem was revised. Could you apply this patch in > > > > Debian? > > > > > > I second that request. The patch is also required for the "mul

Processed: severity of 605450 is important

2010-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 605450 important Bug #605450 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Please support and update multitouch driver of Macbookpro 7,1. Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Bug#605756: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Can't burn CD-R media on 2.6.32-5, can burn CDRW. Both work if 2.6.26-2 booted

2010-12-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 17:29 -0700, loupga...@hethcote.com wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Please can you test Linux 2.6.36 as packaged in experimental? > > > > Ben. > > > > Still unable to write CD-R, CD-RW works, [...] Please report this bug upstream at

Bug#605756: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Can't burn CD-R media on 2.6.32-5, can burn CDRW. Both work if 2.6.26-2 booted

2010-12-06 Thread loupgarou
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] Please can you test Linux 2.6.36 as packaged in experimental? Ben. Still unable to write CD-R, CD-RW works, Louis Results below \/ scsidev: '/dev/cdrom' devname: '/dev/cdrom' scsibus: -2 target: -2 lun: -2 Linux sg driver version: 3.5.27 W

Bug#604096: Bug#602418: #601341, #602418 and #604096 seem to be duplicates

2010-12-06 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> a) Fix the GART/AGP backend (so drivers/char/agp/*.c) so they use the PCI > API. >Only the i915 and higher are using the PCI API and I've some of the older >boxes with i860 so can actually test it. I've posted patches to address this (https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/6/480) and Dave quest

Bug#605450: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Please support and update multitouch driver of Macbookpro 7,1.

2010-12-06 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, 2010/12/7 mike dentifrice : >> > > I confirmed that I made the linux-2.6 package which did this patch >> > > applied, and a problem was revised.  Could you apply this patch in >> > > Debian? >> > >> > I second that request. The patch is also required for the "multitouch" >> > touchpad of the M

Bug#605450: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Please support and update multitouch driver of Macbookpro 7,1.

2010-12-06 Thread mike dentifrice
> > > I confirmed that I made the linux-2.6 package which did this patch > > > applied, and a problem was revised. Could you apply this patch in > > > Debian? > > > > I second that request. The patch is also required for the "multitouch" > > touchpad of the MacBookAir3,1 to work. > > Does the t

Bug#606112: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: using startx results in black screen with locked hardware

2010-12-06 Thread pat
Andreas, In case this helps, I am running the same kernel, but an older ATI hw (ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2), however it's a newer driver (couple of weeks old TOT from git): II) Loading /opt/xorg/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so (II) Module radeon: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compile

Re: Debian libata transition (bug in initramfs-tools?)

2010-12-06 Thread Gordon Farquharson
Hi Ben Thanks for the prompt reply. On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:06, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:42:30AM -0800, Gordon Farquharson wrote: >> (I'm sending this email to debian-kernel because the Debian kernel >> team is listed as the maintainer for initramfs-tools.) > > You sho

Re: Debian libata transition (bug in initramfs-tools?)

2010-12-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:42:30AM -0800, Gordon Farquharson wrote: > (I'm sending this email to debian-kernel because the Debian kernel > team is listed as the maintainer for initramfs-tools.) You should really use the 'reportbug' command to send bug reports. [...] > After doing upgrading the k

Bug#605450: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Please support and update multitouch driver of Macbookpro 7,1.

2010-12-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:11:38PM +0100, mike dentifrice wrote: > Nobuhiro Iwamatsu said: > > Current Linux-2.6 package does not work multitouch device of > > Macbookpro 7,1. This is because driver does not support a multitouch > > protocol of Macbookpro. The patch revising this problem is alrea

Debian libata transition (bug in initramfs-tools?)

2010-12-06 Thread Gordon Farquharson
(I'm sending this email to debian-kernel because the Debian kernel team is listed as the maintainer for initramfs-tools.) I was testing the upgrade from lenny to squeeze on an old arm-based device (the GLAN Tank). This system has a Acard ATP865-B IDE interface chip, so the aec62xx driver was used

Bug#605450: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Please support and update multitouch driver of Macbookpro 7,1.

2010-12-06 Thread mike dentifrice
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu said: > Current Linux-2.6 package does not work multitouch device of > Macbookpro 7,1. This is because driver does not support a multitouch > protocol of Macbookpro. The patch revising this problem is already > taken in by upstream. 6f2701b79f2ee0c5eb946e8a87993acbe8041da3 > >

Processed: email update

2010-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > submitter 471945 ! Bug #471945 [dhcp3-client] dhcp3-client: dhclient does not send vendor-class-identifier by default Changed Bug submitter to 'Christian Hofstaedtler ' from 'Christian Hofstaedtler ' > submitter 587905 ! Bug #587905 [linux-2.6]

linux-2.6_2.6.37~rc4-1~experimental.1_multi.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2010-12-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: firmware-linux-free_2.6.37~rc4-1~experimental.1_all.deb to main/l/linux-2.6/firmware-linux-free_2.6.37~rc4-1~experimental.1_all.deb linux-2.6_2.6.37~rc4-1~experimental.1.diff.gz to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.37~rc4-1~experimental.1.diff.gz linux-2.6_2.6.37~rc4-1~experimental.1.

Bug#606050: marked as done (perf (GPLv2-only) linked with libbfd (GPLv3-only), so undistributable)

2010-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:48:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#606050: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.37~rc4-1~experimental.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #606050, regarding perf (GPLv2-only) linked with libbfd (GPLv3-only), so undistributable to be marked as done. This means

Bug#604750: marked as done (perf: rigid binutils dependency)

2010-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:48:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604750: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.37~rc4-1~experimental.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #604750, regarding perf: rigid binutils dependency to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#461644: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-686: Exporting an lvm-on-md LV to Xen as a disk results in kernel errors and corrupt filesystems)

2010-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:48:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604457: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.37~rc4-1~experimental.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #604457, regarding linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-686: Exporting an lvm-on-md LV to Xen as a disk results in kernel errors and

Bug#604457: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to xen results in error "can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k")

2010-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:48:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604457: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.37~rc4-1~experimental.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #604457, regarding linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to xen results in error "can't convert block across

Bug#603254: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.36-trunk-686-bigmem: please enable CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG)

2010-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:48:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#603254: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.37~rc4-1~experimental.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #603254, regarding linux-image-2.6.36-trunk-686-bigmem: please enable CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG to be marked as done. Thi

Bug#602669: marked as done (linux-2.6/experimental: FTBFS on armel)

2010-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:48:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#602669: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.37~rc4-1~experimental.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #602669, regarding linux-2.6/experimental: FTBFS on armel to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#605448: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: xen dom0 and domU hang on reboot/halt

2010-12-06 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 18:03 +0100, Richard Mittendorfer wrote: > Builded wrong version. Removing CONFIG_KEXEC surely is not enough. > Reverting ae832c21a08514fd11d2d1d6e217c8a537764bb0 fixes it. This revert has been queued by the stable Linux maintainer and will (presumably) be in v2.6.32.27. Ian

Processed: tagging 603632

2010-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 603632 + pending Bug #603632 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64] linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Linux kernel 2.6.32/xen/amd64 booting fine on bare metal, but not as d

Bug#516382: tg3: incoming ssh fails with "Corrupted MAC on input"

2010-12-06 Thread Thomas Arendsen Hein
* Thomas Arendsen Hein [20101106 21:58]: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Please test whether this bug is still present in 2.6.32 as packaged in > > unstable or testing. > > I experiences this problem with linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 (2.6.32-15) after > which I activated the workaround mentioned here > (p

Bug#606096: linux-2.6: Please reset CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_SGE to upstream default

2010-12-06 Thread Bjørn Mork
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Debian is deviating from the upstream default for CONFIG_FUSION_MAX_SGE This confuses users and makes upstream bug reporting more difficult than necessary. Ref http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi/64136 I a

Bug#605909: Bug is Blank Screen Related

2010-12-06 Thread Anton Martchukov
Small update. This bug is related to the screen being powered off due to inactivity. I disabled display power off in gnome and the system run over a night without a problem. Thus now it traced down to be happening only when the screen goes off in gnome session (I never reproduced a freeze within

Bug#602109: Acknowledgement ([linux-2.6] 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 0)

2010-12-06 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Ian, On Monday 06 December 2010 11:10:40 Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 18:57 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: > > On Friday, 3. December 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > It is probably filtered out of syslog because it has a low priority > > > level. 'dmesg' should show you all the kerne

Processed: Re: Bug#602109: Acknowledgement ([linux-2.6] 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 0)

2010-12-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 602109 xen: dom0: ACPI crash in xen_acpi_processor_add Bug #602109 [linux-2.6] [linux-2.6] 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 0 Changed Bug title to 'xen: dom0: ACPI crash in xen_acpi_processor_add' from '[linux-2.6] 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 0'

Bug#602109: Acknowledgement ([linux-2.6] 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 0)

2010-12-06 Thread Ian Campbell
retitle 602109 xen: dom0: ACPI crash in xen_acpi_processor_add thanks Hi Jan, On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 18:57 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: > > On Friday, 3. December 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > It is probably filtered out of syslog because it has a low priority > > level. 'dmesg' should show you all

Bug#604824: linux-2.6: problems with ata disk interface: temporary freezes

2010-12-06 Thread Fulvio Ciriaco
At Sat, 04 Dec 2010 16:40:32 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 22:37 +0100, Fulvio Ciriaco wrote: > > Hallo, > > I have run 1day after booting pci=nomsi and > > 1 day after booting lapic. > > I am now running after booting noapic. > > I do not notice any difference, lspci is id