On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:53:24PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Graham wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I am wondering whether anyone has looked into which AMD CPUs support
> >these instructions. I would think that installing a 486 kernel on an
> >AthlonXP, for example, would be quite sub-optimal.
> >
> >
Package: linux-source-2.6.24
Version: 2.6.24-4
Severity: important
Building kernel 2.6.24 fails as shown below. A solution is to symbolicly link
/usr/bin/moc-qt3 to /usr/bin/moc:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root7 2008-02-13 16:57 moc -> moc-qt3*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 505K 2008-02-09 13:38 moc-q
Graham wrote:
Hello,
I am wondering whether anyone has looked into which AMD CPUs support
these instructions. I would think that installing a 486 kernel on an
AthlonXP, for example, would be quite sub-optimal.
i.e. can you safely enable X86_P6_NOP for other CPUs, such as AMD
K7/K8, VIA C3/C7, o
> If not, would it be more sensible to avoid using these instructions?
Sorry, this question was not directed at Linux in general, but rather
at Debian's generic 686 kernel. My thought was to allow the largest
possible number of users to benefit from the 686 kernel, instead of
forcing them to downg
Hello,
I am wondering whether anyone has looked into which AMD CPUs support
these instructions. I would think that installing a 486 kernel on an
AthlonXP, for example, would be quite sub-optimal.
i.e. can you safely enable X86_P6_NOP for other CPUs, such as AMD
K7/K8, VIA C3/C7, or Efficeon? If n
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-4
Severity: wishlist
Using syslinux (e.g. on an usb stick) /boot is usually some vfat file
system. Since it doesn't support symlinks to create vmlinuz and initrd.img,
it might be more reasonable to do a copy or a rename on this filesystem.
Many
Hi Arie
I wonder if your C3 suffers from the same limitation as Joey's TM5800.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464962#75
Does the -486 kernel boot correctly on your C3?
-- graham
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-4
Severity: normal
Hi,
me personal, would consider it 'grave', though ;-)
could please someone reenable snd-cs46xx ?
thanx
--Jan
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.24-1-686 (Debian 2.6.24-4) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc versio
> Am 2008-02-11 21:21:58, schrieb Joey Hess:
> > I opened a bug about this problem since I'm seeing it. It would help if you
> > mailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] with information about your system.
Here's the dmesg from my system. Is an Asus M2N-SLI Deluxe AM2
motherboard with an AMD Athlon64 3800+ CPU
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 06:05:20PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > even with 2.6.24-4 linux images?
> > please mention the uname of your tests
>
> I'll see if I can do the tests on a clean install with the latest linux
> images tomorrow.
uname:
Linux barebone1 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Feb 11 13:
Package: linux-image-2.6-vserver-amd64
Version: 2.6.22+11
Severity: wishlist
Current linux image includes vserver 2.2.0.5 patch, I need something
that is included in 2.2.0.6 so I would appreciate it if this is
included.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers stable
APT
Am 2008-02-12 01:43:27, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> MK> There is a SMP-Problem with a couple of Athlon Socket A mainboards
> OK, I checked the web,
> > SMP stands for Symmetric Multi Processors. It's a PC with 2 or more
> > processors.
> which is not my case. Just a single Duron. So I'm safe, I su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:47:19AM +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
>On this etch host rc8 went with pata too, but 2.6.24-4 goes back to ide
>drivers on default ramdisk etc settings. Great, but was this fixed by
>upstream or some Debian change which I missed
Am 2008-02-12 01:43:27, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> MK> There is a SMP-Problem with a couple of Athlon Socket A mainboards
> OK, I checked the web,
> > SMP stands for Symmetric Multi Processors. It's a PC with 2 or more
> > processors.
> which is not my case. Just a single Duron. So I'm safe, I su
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:15:51PM +0100, Rafael Belmonte wrote:
> Each time amsn starts session happens.
> Few minutes ago system was complete freeze again doing other tasks
> (amsn was not running):
> I installed boinc-manager and boinc-client, boinc-client started to
> work, I open K Menu (KDE)
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Vincent Zweije wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:21:46PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> || On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, Vincent Zweije wrote:
>
> || > Reportbug asked for 2.6.24-2 but I didn't see that on
> || > packages.debian.org, so this is for 2.6.24-1.
> ||
> || than
Each time amsn starts session happens.
Few minutes ago system was complete freeze again doing other tasks
(amsn was not running):
I installed boinc-manager and boinc-client, boinc-client started to
work, I open K Menu (KDE) and I put mouse pointer in Programs, then
all system was freeze again.
-
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hpa/0001-x86-do-not-promote-TM3x00-TM5x00-to-i686-class.patch
>
> -hpa
thanks!
hmm no mention of boot crash in description
please also add pointer to bug report
http://bugs.debian.og/464962
on our s
On 13/02/2008 Libor Klepáč wrote:
> Hi,
> i'm sorry, it was my fault, i have this line
>
> options sbs update_time=10
>
> in /etc/modprobe.d/local
>
> After comenting it out, module loads, but my notebook freezes hard, doesn't
> respond to magic sysrq even.
> 2.6.24 boot freezes on HAL starting
Your message dated Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:48:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: CPU waking up too often with 2.6.24-rc7
has caused the Debian Bug report #460668,
regarding CPU waking up too often with 2.6.24-rc7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hello,
this morning, I had exactly the same problem while installing
linux-image-2.6.22-3-686 (2.6.22-6.lenny1 Debian-Security:None/testing)
The box didn't reboot.
The last time it happened, this is how our distant hostmaster managed to
correcte the problem :
>The technician had to boot the se
Hi,
i'm sorry, it was my fault, i have this line
options sbs update_time=10
in /etc/modprobe.d/local
After comenting it out, module loads, but my notebook freezes hard, doesn't
respond to magic sysrq even.
2.6.24 boot freezes on HAL starting up, 2.6.23 boots most times, but sometimes
freezes a
Package: redhat-cluster
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please find attached the french debconf templates update, proofread by the
debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors.
Thanks for taking care of warning translators before uploading a new
version with string changes. It's
23 matches
Mail list logo
