Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> If this looks correct, I'll submit it upstream and then we can
>> look at backporting it into a stable update.
>
> It looks like you've defined the HP_NETRAID[12]M_SUBSYS_DID constansts
> however forgot to
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If this looks correct, I'll submit it upstream and then we can
> look at backporting it into a stable update.
It looks like you've defined the HP_NETRAID[12]M_SUBSYS_DID constansts
however forgot to change to code to use them and on the if you use the
de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> unmerge 441907
Bug#441907: linux-modules-extra-2.6: aufs doesn't build with vserver
Bug#441307: aufs: FTBFS on some archs/flavours
Disconnected #441907 from all other report(s).
> #
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 07:12:52PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:53:50AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > Have you verified that this fix works in 2.6.18? It seems like its
> > adding support for megaraid3s w/ specific subsystem devices, while
> > 2.6.18 (and current upstre
Your message dated Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:30:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
[ d-devel removed, no reason ]
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Le vendredi 14 septembre 2007, maximilian attems a écrit :
>
> Obviously you missed Luk when he said
> >>The version specified is the version in testing...
and i told you as maintainer if that you should test the _newer_
Le vendredi 14 septembre 2007, maximilian attems a écrit :
> any unstable kernel installs just fine on testing.
>
> woow instead of loosing blabla time a simple upgrade could have
> been done long ago. i told you the reality 2.6.21 is _not_ supported.
> it is also certainly not the version with whi
[ removed useless -devel cc ]
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 06:33:31PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> I concur.
>
> But, still, clearly, one cannot ask for info, more input from the user, while
> at the same time disregard 99% of the info already provided.
>
> Well, I hope that you are right and that i
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:53:50AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Have you verified that this fix works in 2.6.18? It seems like its
> adding support for megaraid3s w/ specific subsystem devices, while
> 2.6.18 (and current upstream) claim megaraid3 devices w/ *any*
> subsystem ids. (Although there d
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:20:35AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
>> hey,
>> I think we're nearly ready for a kernel upload to proposed-updates.
>> Here's the current list of changes queued for a stable upload.
>
> Can you please consider fixing #317258 again? It's only about PCI ID
Le vendredi 14 septembre 2007, Luk Claes a écrit :
> Well for packages with many changes and many users it's not always easy
> to debug every single problem. So sometimes it's a great help if bug
> submitters test if the problem still occurs in the latest version...
Hello Luk,
I concur.
But, st
We don't save your credit card information and can't even view it.
http://fromad.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mathieu Roy wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686
Version: 2.6.21-6
Severity: important
stopped reading at that point, there is newer linux images
in the archive install them directly from unstable.
The version specified is the version in testing...
Amazing.
Tell me, are your trying to tu
>> Package: linux-image-2.6.21-2-686
>> Version: 2.6.21-6
>> Severity: important
>
>stopped reading at that point, there is newer linux images
>in the archive install them directly from unstable.
Amazing.
Tell me, are your trying to turn debian support/BTS into a joke?
If one need to run the bran
My question was not answered here?
http://fromad.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can order our products with all the major Credit Cards (Visa, Master Card,
Amex).
http://fromad.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
Hi
I think we should add patches to update the forcedeth and e1000 drivers
to the latest version, too. Those are many changes, but also many new
boxes require those new drivers: obviously most nvidia based athlon
and opteron boards, and many xeon board (superm
Hello,
I think we should add patches to update the forcedeth and e1000 drivers
to the latest version, too. Those are many changes, but also many new
boxes require those new drivers: obviously most nvidia based athlon
and opteron boards, and many xeon board (supermicro, tyan).
What is the chance
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:10:44PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Friday 14 September 2007 14:57, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > The patch needs to be applied upstream until it can appear again.
>
> Why?
>
> I mean, I agree for sid, but I don't see the point in not fixing this in
> stable.
>
> Care
Your message dated Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:13:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442187: linux-image-2.6.22-2-686: problem with lvm...
actually with initrd -- solved
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Hi,
On Friday 14 September 2007 14:57, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The patch needs to be applied upstream until it can appear again.
Why?
I mean, I agree for sid, but I don't see the point in not fixing this in
stable.
Care to elaborate?
regards,
Holger
pgpwLVsMSclXO.pgp
Description: PG
Package: linux-image-2.6.22-2-686
Followup-For: Bug #442187
Thank you for the link. I couldn't get the rescue console, but I checked
the initrd files. The one for 2.6.22-2-686 was... empty. I reinstalled
the package with this kernel and the initrd image was regenerated. Now it
works too.
-- Packa
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:18:48PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Is there?
The patch needs to be applied upstream until it can appear again. It
moves devices between two different drivers, which obviously are not
compatible.
Both megaraid drivers looks not really good maintained.
Bastian
--
A
I have the same problem with Debian Etch and kernel 2.6.8-5-powerpc. Is
the solution compile a newer kernel?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 12:16, Luk Claes wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:20:35AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> Can you please consider fixing #317258 again? It's only about PCI ID
> >> mappings that got lost while splitting the megaraid and megaraid_mbox
> >> d
When people request their treatment they frequently seek the following:
Safety
Fast Dependable Distribution
High-level Quality
Large selection of Medical Treatments
Great Cut Rate
Medicine assistance
As the largest web-based Pharmacy in Canada we satisfy all six of these
signifi
Your message dated Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:03:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442252: linux-image-2.6.18-5-k7: loop-aes does not work
because CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=m
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-5-k7
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch2
Severity: important
When trying to mount a device crypted with loop-aes I get this error:
ioctl: LOOP_MULTI_KEY_SETUP_V3: Invalid argument
The loop-aes documentation says that CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP must be set to "n",
but in Debian Etc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 441907 aufs
Bug#441907: linux-modules-extra-2.6: aufs doesn't build with vserver
Bug reassigned from package `linux-modules-extra-2.6' to `aufs'.
> merge 441907 441307
Bug#441307: aufs: FTBFS on some archs/flavours
Bug#441907: linux-modules-ex
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 14 September 2007 12:33, Robert Millan wrote:
> Please could you add some check in debian/rules to prevent non-free
> firmware from inadvertingly entering the linux-2.6 package, as descr
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
Tags: security
Hi,
a CVE has been issued against JFFS2 which is included in the
linux kernel.
CVE-2007-4849[0]:
JFFS2, as used on One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) build 542 and possibly other
Linux systems, when POSIX ACL support is enabled, does not properly store
Vizit mycheapoem. com in Internnet Xp1orer browser.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 12:33:58PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Please could you add some check in debian/rules to prevent non-free firmware
> from inadvertingly entering the linux-2.6 package, as described in the mail
> quoted below?
You voluntered to write one? It needs to apply a heuristic, ot
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: wishlist
Please could you add some check in debian/rules to prevent non-free firmware
from inadvertingly entering the linux-2.6 package, as described in the mail
quoted below?
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:29:29AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 12 Se
Your message dated Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:50:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#44: linux-image-2.6.18-5-686: mounting floppy disk
impossible
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
maximilian attems schrieb:
it's not up to the kernel to create this device.
So should I file a bug report on udev then?
is the floppy module loaded?
no, and this should be done by the kernel IMHO.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:28:51AM +0200, Olaf Zaplinski wrote:
>
> mounting floppy disk is impossible:
>
> # mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 /media/floppy0
> mount: special device /dev/fd0 does not exist
it's not up to the kernel to create this device.
is the floppy module loaded?
--
maks
--
To
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-5-686
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch2
Severity: normal
mounting floppy disk is impossible:
# mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 /media/floppy0
mount: special device /dev/fd0 does not exist
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stab
Your message dated Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:32:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #431291: can not be reproduced anymore - issue seems to be
fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:12:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#441860: initramfs-tools: Resume from swap partition in LVM
doesn't work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
tags 442187 moreinfo
stop
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 12:32:35AM +0200, Tomasz Melcer wrote:
>
> linux-image-2.6.22-2-686 fails to discover (and therefore mount) logical
> volumes of lvm2 storage. I have got root filesystem inside lvm,
> therefore I cannot boot into system using that kernel. The last
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 442187 moreinfo
Bug#442187: linux-image-2.6.22-2-686: 2.6.22-2-686 fails to discover lvm
logical volumes; 2.6.22-1-686 works ok
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
42 matches
Mail list logo
