On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:57:08AM +0530, Deepak Tripathi wrote:
> Hi all
> if any debian developer is there then please advocate my application i am
> wating for an advovate.
> email id :- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Name :- Deepak Tripathi
Well, it would help if you spoke a bit more about yourself, and
Hi all
if any debian developer is there then please advocate my application i am wating for an advovate.
email id :- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Name :- Deepak Tripathi
Thanks
On 6/1/06, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:34:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:> So i
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:09:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:54:33AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > Other issues:
> > > > * NEW
> > > > Quite a lot of the arches have the newest version of linux-2.6
> > > > stuck in NEW for a week. I assume the f
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:59:36AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 07:50:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Anthony, ...
> > I would like to hear your comment on the possibility to override the need
> > for
> > NEW for the creation of some new binary package [...]
>
> Sven,
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 07:50:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Anthony, ...
> I would like to hear your comment on the possibility to override the need for
> NEW for the creation of some new binary package [...]
Sven, you bring this up every chance you get, please stop it. You're not
interested in
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 16:32:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#271033: fixed in mdadm 2.4.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
mdadm 2.5-1 is ready to take over initramfs configuration for RAID
systems. It currently conflicts with initramfs-tools (<= 0.60)
because it changes the name of the scripts/local-top file from md to
mdadm, but lvm depends on 'md'.
Thus, please do the following when you upload the next version:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:07:04PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
:
: > I don't think so, I re-run myself lilo before reboot, and after the
: > first panic I dpkg-reconfigured linux-image so initrd.img was rebuilt
: > and I re-run lilo again. After getting the same result, I started
: > digging
I don't the status of the bug or if someone has already replied, since
bugs.debian.org seems down now.
Ray Kohler wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-amd64-k8
Version: 2.6.16-14
Severity: normal
After installing this kernel upgrade, my sound no longer works. It is a
builtin board which uses t
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:34:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> So if -15 is still broken I should plan to NMU rather than count on -16
> doing anything to address the needs of testing users in a timely manner?
Only porters have the right to do so with consensus within the porter
group. And even
>With only one distribution exception (which later fails for a different
>reason), most of the 2.6 kernel distributions do NOT install on a Compaq
>Presario 1220 including "Debian GNU/Linux testing "Etch"".
I'm getting this exact problem; the exact problem described in the bug report.
With a C
11 matches
Mail list logo
