On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 08:10:10AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
> Here's the best patch I've been able to find for this so far.
This is completely weird, any ideas why this hasn't shown up before?
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
FWIW, this is still reproducible using 2.6.12-6.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 06:22:07PM -0700, Shyamal Prasad wrote:
>
> Just got back to working on my linux box and noticed that Paul
> Brossier seems to have found a fix for his problems on a PowerMac7,2
> (#323724).
>
> Just for the record, I can confirm that removing the NVIDIA FB allows
> me to
Here's the best patch I've been able to find for this so far.
--
see shy jo
--- linux/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c.seg2005-03-27 13:10:45.0 -0800
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c2005-03-28 10:30:24.0 -0800
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ extern int (*console_blank_hook)(int);
* Save a
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 02:51:29AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > We can do a 2.6.12-8 for it then, since i want to include the powerpc-small
> > miboot kernel too. What is your take on that ? Can you come discuss your
> > plans
> > with us on #debian-kernel (oftc).
>
> You probably misunderstoo
The problem here is that Debian implicitly supports having
multiple kernel packages and in fact no kernel packages installed
to allow users to provide their own kernels.
It might be prudent to document this "feature" somewhere,
but I don't think its a bug in the kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686,
or any ot
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 01:39:18PM +0300, Nikos Ntarmos wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Version: 2.4.27-11.hls.2005082200
> Severity: important
>
> Kernels compiled from kernel-source-2.4.27 fail to boot on x86_64, with
> a 'FATAL: Kernel too old' error. This is on a 3.1r0a/x86_64 system,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:57:13AM -0400, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-26-07 at 17:27 +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > can you please test the 2.6.12 linux image in unstable?
> > does the bug still occurs?
> >
> > --
> > maks
>
> I never found time for this but I noticed in the 2.6.13 ann
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 02:58:19AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > > As for if it is ready for upload? I am not sure. You are
> > > > > the one propmoting uploading 2.6.12-7. I certainly think
> > > > > that the addition of the 2.6.13.1 and 2.6.13.2 patches that
> > > >
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:10:31AM -0700, Allyn, Mark A wrote:
> I read the config listings, and I have some questions.
>
> I don't see the ALSA driver setting. Are we planning to have that
> set to at least 'm'?
>
> Also, what about the AGP and DRM (for graphics)? I am particularly
> intereste
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 01:31:37PM +0300, Nikos Ntarmos wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Version: 2.4.27-11.hls.2005082200
> Severity: important
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> Patch 143_outs.diff.bz2 breaks the kernel compilation on x86_64. The
> problem is that it uses th
Just got back to working on my linux box and noticed that Paul
Brossier seems to have found a fix for his problems on a PowerMac7,2
(#323724).
Just for the record, I can confirm that removing the NVIDIA FB allows
me to also boot a PowerMac7,3 using a 64 bit kernel built with
2.6.12-6.
Cheers!
Sh
Horms wrote:
[snip]
> > > > As for if it is ready for upload? I am not sure. You are
> > > > the one propmoting uploading 2.6.12-7. I certainly think
> > > > that the addition of the 2.6.13.1 and 2.6.13.2 patches that
> > > > I added makes it more ready for upload. So if you though
> > > > it was r
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:37:02AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Horms wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:55:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:50:27PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > > I have made an i386 build of what is currently in SVN,
> >
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> severity 329422 normal
Bug#329422: No warnings when uninstalling kernel package
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> the amd64 port does not support 2.4 kernels, and there are no plans
> top change this.
ACK. I guess I missed that part in the release notes... I re-read the
whole thing an
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Theo Schmidt wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 21. September 2005 16.56 schrieb Maximilian Attems:
> > this is an isa sound card?
>
> I don't know. It's an onboard card (IBM Intellistation Pro). alsaconf can't
> find it under ISA (or at all).
please send the ouput of lspci -vv (even i
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: critical
Most of the time when I try to uninstall a package that's critical to
system functionality, it tells me I'm about to uninstall a core
component and asks me to type, "Yes I know what I'm doing" or similar to
continue.
$ sudo ap
Hello,
the amd64 port does not support 2.4 kernels, and there are no plans top
change this.
During the initial porting, We wanted NPTL and TLS support in libc6 in
the first place, and considering the rudimentary support x86_64 had in
2.4 kernels at that time (this might have changed in the mean
Am Mittwoch, 21. September 2005 16.56 schrieb Maximilian Attems:
...
> > Yes, but alsaconf can't find the card. Neither can the KDE Infozentrum or
> > any other tool I know, only Knoppix (all versions), which finds it OK.
>
> this is an isa sound card?
I don't know. It's an onboard card (IBM Intel
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:12:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329355: Kernels compiled from kernel-source-2.4.27 can't
boot on x86_64.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Hi.
There is no available kernel-image-2.4.27 for amd64.
Release notes clearly states:
For the AMD64 architecture only a 2.6 kernel is available with kernel
version 2.6.8. Note that Debian's 2.6.8 kernel packages include the
2.6.8.1 kernel release and selected other patches.
The kernel-s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 329355 important
Bug#329355: Kernels compiled from kernel-source-2.4.27 can't boot on x86_64.
Severity set to `important'.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
severity 329355 important
stop
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:07:52PM +0300, Nikos Ntarmos wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 04:59:03PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> > why can't you use the 2.6 kernel image?
>
> I've been having problems with a SiI3112 card in a server I'm trying to
> setup. I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 04:59:03PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> why can't you use the 2.6 kernel image?
I've been having problems with a SiI3112 card in a server I'm trying to
setup. I've filed a bug with the kernel's bugzilla (bug id: 5279), sin
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 03:20:39PM +0200, Theo Schmidt wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 21. September 2005 11.45 schrieb Horms:
> ...
> > Can you try running the following on the command line?
> >
> > modprobe cs4232
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/theo# modprobe cs4232
> FATAL: Error inserting cs4232
> (/lib/m
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 01:39:18PM +0300, Nikos Ntarmos wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Version: 2.4.27-11.hls.2005082200
> Severity: important
>
> Kernels compiled from kernel-source-2.4.27 fail to boot on x86_64, with
> a 'FATAL: Kernel too old' error. This is on a 3.1r0a/x86_64 system,
On Tue, 2005-26-07 at 17:27 +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> can you please test the 2.6.12 linux image in unstable?
> does the bug still occurs?
>
> --
> maks
I never found time for this but I noticed in the 2.6.13 announcement
that several Radeon fixes are included so I will either try to buil
I read the config listings, and I have some questions.
I don't see the ALSA driver setting. Are we planning to have that
set to at least 'm'?
Also, what about the AGP and DRM (for graphics)? I am particularly
interested in CONFIG_DRM_I810, CONFIG_DRM_I830, CONFIG_DRM_I915,
CONFIG_DRM, CONFIG_AG
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 12:52:40PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please don't change the memory model settings for amd64, I already set
> and checked them to work.
>
> amd64 need FLATMEM for UP and em64t kernels, and DISCONTIGMEM for
> k8-smp.
>
> The only thing which should chang
Am Mittwoch, 21. September 2005 09:23 schrieb Horms:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:17:03PM +0200, Uwe Mesecke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > are there any progresses since may? I have the same problems with my
> > server. It crashes not daily but at least twice a week at night
> > between 12am and 4am CEST.
Thank you for the answers:
Am Mittwoch, 21. September 2005 11.45 schrieb Horms:
...
> Can you try running the following on the command line?
>
> modprobe cs4232
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/theo# modprobe cs4232
FATAL: Error inserting cs4232
(/lib/modules/2.6.12-1-686/kernel/sound/oss/cs4232.ko): No
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 06:34:13PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:37:02AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Horms wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:55:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:50:27PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > > I have made an i386 bu
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:37:02AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:55:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:50:27PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > I have made an i386 build of what is currently in SVN,
> > > > its version is 2.6.12-6.
Hello,
please don't change the memory model settings for amd64, I already set
and checked them to work.
amd64 need FLATMEM for UP and em64t kernels, and DISCONTIGMEM for
k8-smp.
The only thing which should change is HOTPLUG_CPU to y, which is needed
for suspend.
Best regards
Frederik Schueler
Dear Home0wner,
You have been pre-approveed for a $624,000 Homee Looan at an
introductory APR of 3.68%!
This Second M0rtgagge is being extended to you unconditionally
and your credit is in no way a factor.
To take Advantage of this Limited Time opportunity
All we ask is that you visit our W
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
Version: 2.4.27-11.hls.2005082200
Severity: important
Kernels compiled from kernel-source-2.4.27 fail to boot on x86_64, with
a 'FATAL: Kernel too old' error. This is on a 3.1r0a/x86_64 system, with
security and standard updates as of yesterday. The error is probably
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
Version: 2.4.27-11.hls.2005082200
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
Patch 143_outs.diff.bz2 breaks the kernel compilation on x86_64. The
problem is that it uses the IO_BITMAP_BYTES macro which is defined for
i386 (in linux/include/asm-i386/
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 11:11:53AM +0200, Theo Schmidt wrote:
> I've updated my kernel from an old 2.4.20 kernel originally installed by
> Knoppix 3.2 to the 2.6.12-1-686 debian kernel installed by synaptic (debian
> testing) and adjusting lilo.conf by hand. Now my sound no longer works
> (/dev/
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:19:21PM +0200, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686
> Version: 2.4.27-10
> Followup-For: Bug #315110
>
>
> Hi,
>
> after some time, I tried to work under kernel 2.6.8 and I don't even get
> the module to work.
Hi, if this is a problem with 2.6.8, i
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:17:03PM +0200, Uwe Mesecke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are there any progresses since may? I have the same problems with my
> server. It crashes not daily but at least twice a week at night between
> 12am and 4am CEST. I am using the kernel provided with sarge which is
> IMHO -1
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 11:11:53AM +0200, Theo Schmidt wrote:
> I've updated my kernel from an old 2.4.20 kernel originally installed by
> Knoppix 3.2 to the 2.6.12-1-686 debian kernel installed by synaptic (debian
> testing) and adjusting lilo.conf by hand. Now my sound no longer works
> (/dev/
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:37:02AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Horms wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:55:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:50:27PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > > I have made an i386 build of what is currently in SVN,
> > > > its version is 2.6.12-6.
I've updated my kernel from an old 2.4.20 kernel originally installed by
Knoppix 3.2 to the 2.6.12-1-686 debian kernel installed by synaptic (debian
testing) and adjusting lilo.conf by hand. Now my sound no longer works
(/dev/dsp can't be opened). Using modconf on both kernels I see the same
mo
Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:55:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:50:27PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > I have made an i386 build of what is currently in SVN,
> > > its version is 2.6.12-6.hls.2005092100, but the
> > > version is the only thing I changed, just
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:55:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:50:27PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > I have made an i386 build of what is currently in SVN,
> > its version is 2.6.12-6.hls.2005092100, but the
> > version is the only thing I changed, just to distinguish
> > it
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 03:44:59PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are a couple of requests for various options to be turned
> on and off floating around on this list and in the BTS. They all
> look pretty reasonable, so I'd like to make them happen.
>
> Unfortunately, the current state of th
47 matches
Mail list logo
