severity 329355 important stop On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:07:52PM +0300, Nikos Ntarmos wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 04:59:03PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote: > > why can't you use the 2.6 kernel image? > > I've been having problems with a SiI3112 card in a server I'm trying to > setup. I've filed a bug with the kernel's bugzilla (bug id: 5279), since > this is almost instantly reproducible with both distribution and > upstream kernels. > > This is not the first time I use a SiI3112 controller though; I've at > least one more computer that has this chip and does really well, even > under high loads. The difference is that the latter computer runs a > 2.4.x kernel. I've google'd around quite a bit the last few days, only > to see that people are having tons of issues with this controller and > 2.6 kernels, so I thought I'd switch back to a 2.4 one; this is going to > be a production system, so stability is much more important to me than > speed or anything.
would be nice to have had that info in the initial bug report. that's why i asked? :) > The reason why I filed this bug report is that IMO there is no reason in > having a package available for download and installation when it can't > be of any use, all of this without letting people know that they can't > do anything with it. Of course, there is a (small) possibility that I've > done something wrong with my build system, in which case I apologize for > the noise. However, I strongly believe that that's not the case. Even > so, I suggest that these things be at least documented or something. anyway please cool down x86_64 was not a sarge released arch. therefor setting the severity to important. anyway thanks for pointing out the patch which breaks for the x86_64 arch. guess horms (2.4) and fs (amd64) will pick that up. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
