On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:37:02AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Horms wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:55:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:50:27PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > > I have made an i386 build of what is currently in SVN, > > > > its version is 2.6.12-6.hls.2005092100, but the > > > > version is the only thing I changed, just to distinguish > > > > it from the official upload. > > > > > > > > http://packages.vergenet.net/testing/linux-2.6/ > > > > > > So, you think it is ready for upload ? What about the patch you removed, > > > can > > > we release without it in a sane way ? > > > > Removing the patch that I removed should be quite ok, > > it seems to fix a problem that was introduced since 2.6.12. > > > > As for if it is ready for upload? I am not sure. You are > > the one propmoting uploading 2.6.12-7. I certainly think > > that the addition of the 2.6.13.1 and 2.6.13.2 patches that > > I added makes it more ready for upload. So if you though > > it was ready yesterday, then yes, its ready today. > > > > I'm doing a 2.6.12-7 build now. I'm happy to upload this > > if others are happy. But I am still not entierly sure why > > there is a push to get 2.6.12-7 ready, and thus I am not entirely > > sure what it should include. > > FWIW, I would like to see 2.6.12-7 as basis for the mips kernels in > the next days.
I spoke a bit more to Sven about this on IRC, and it looks like we will go ahead with what we have. I have the binaries built (i386) and will upload once I get a final go-ahead from Sven. I even tested that they boot and am running one of them now :) -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
