reopen 315968
thanks
This bug is still valid for 2.6.8, so lets leave it here for now.
At the very least we can use it to coodinate known problems
in 2.6.8
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Microsoft Money Premium 2005 - $19.95
http://assimilated.gotun.com/
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
I am not young enough to know everything.
Getting caught is the mother of invention.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 06:58:12PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:27:26AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: security patch
> >
> > An overflow in sock->sk_policy could possibly be exploited as DoS or
> > potential execution
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:56:13AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:31:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > Why not use linux-image-foo instead of kernel-image-foo, w/ an
> > appropriate Replaces/Conflicts/Provides?
>
> This is not an appropriate upgrade path as this headers
ALERT: Second Notification
Although you were not accepted initially, we are now happy to present you with
three deals from two different brokers.
Remember, there is absolutely No commitment required on your part and past
credit is a non-issue.
Please validate your information with our secure/p
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:31:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> Why not use linux-image-foo instead of kernel-image-foo, w/ an
> appropriate Replaces/Conflicts/Provides?
This is not an appropriate upgrade path as this headers don't ask apt to
install the new package.
Bastian
--
We have phasers,
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:31:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 10:34 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:18:20PM -0700, Debian Installer wrote:
> > >
> > > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in
> > > unstable >= new version
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 09:56:07PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 04:45:37PM +0200, Fabio Muzzi wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I have read the cahngelog for Debian version of kernel 2.4.27 (and .26
> > too) and I have found that the latest version of Posix ACL patches se
Hi,
Referring to
http://people.debian.org/~dannf/kernel-stats/kernel-avail.html
(thanks dannf) I notice that the following kernel-tree versions
are in use in Sarge:
2.4.27-10: alpha, i386, ia64, powerpc (latest)
2.4.27-9: powerpc
2.4.27-8: s390
2.4.27-5: apus(so old its scary)
2.6.8-16:
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 10:34 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:18:20PM -0700, Debian Installer wrote:
> >
> > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in
> > unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 321866 linux-2.6
Bug#321866: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7: tattered symlinks left in / after purge
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7' to `linux-2.6'.
> severity 321866 important
Bug#321866: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7: tattered symli
tag 321167 +pending
thanks
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:51:36AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 10:11:21AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > I'm sorry but all that is over my head, beyond my level.
> > All I know is that all the files in pool/main/l/linux-2.6/ need
> > Descriptions
Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:45:19 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322058: please include vt1211 sensor chip patch
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
tag 321885 +pending
thanks
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:00:25AM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> Package: linux-source-2.6.12
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> As mentioned in
>
> http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/linux-ia64/0508/14811.html
>
> CONFIG_PALINFO isn't built-in to Debian
reassign 321866 linux-2.6
severity 321866 important
merge 321866 320422 321752
--
Horms
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:50:47PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:52:33PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Version: 2.6.12-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > There used to exist packages that depend on all -headers packages for a
> > particular arch (eg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 321167 +pending
Bug#321167: linux-image: say the difference vs. kernel-image
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 10:34 +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:18:20PM -0700, Debian Installer wrote:
> >
> > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in
> > unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> > Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:18:20PM -0700, Debian Installer wrote:
>
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in
> unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in
> testing >= new
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Version: 2.6.12-1
In April, I filed the attached bug report, which was summarily closed with a
claim that a workaround existed and it was fixed in version 2.6.12. At the
time I was too busy to look into this further, so I just limped along without
sound and
Package: linux-source-2.6.12
Version: 2.6.12-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
It would be wonderful if you could include this patch in the
stock debian kernel:
http://hem.bredband.net/ekmlar/vt1211.html
It's the sensor chip contained in mini-ITX boards, among others,
providing temperature readings, et
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686
Version: 2.6.11-7
Severity: normal
SYMTOMS
The combination of LVM2 + Kernel 2.6.11 + Reiserfs 3.6 periodically
paniced about 1-2 times a month during period of more than 6 months.
BACKGROUND
The 60G laptop hard drive was partitioned using standard Debian
netin
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 09:00:01PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:47:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:57:22PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:55:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > - Each arch may speci
Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in
unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in
testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 04:45:37PM +0200, Fabio Muzzi wrote:
>
>
>
> I have read the cahngelog for Debian version of kernel 2.4.27 (and .26
> too) and I have found that the latest version of Posix ACL patches seems
> to be 0.8.71, merged by Herbert Xu in April 2004.
>
> As far as I kn
linux-2.6_2.6.12-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.12-2.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.12-2.diff.gz
linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12-2_all.deb
linux-tree-2.6.12_2.6.12-2_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.12_2.6.12-2_all.deb
linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-2_all.deb
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:47:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:57:22PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:55:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > - Each arch may specify an architectury specific patch, each image
> > > package may specify a
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:52:33PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.12-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> There used to exist packages that depend on all -headers packages for a
> particular arch (eg. kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-i386). This is very useful
> for build-depends when
I have read the cahngelog for Debian version of kernel 2.4.27 (and .26
too) and I have found that the latest version of Posix ACL patches seems
to be 0.8.71, merged by Herbert Xu in April 2004.
As far as I know, this version has bug that makes default ACLs disappear
from directorie
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.12-1
Severity: wishlist
There used to exist packages that depend on all -headers packages for a
particular arch (eg. kernel-headers-2.6.11-1-i386). This is very useful
for build-depends when autobuilding external module packages.
Such packages seem to no longer ex
Followup-For: Bug #312973
Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-k7
Version: 2.6.11-7
Hello,
I can't vouch for the sound playback problems but I'm seeing the clock
drift problem on my system as well:
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 10
model name
Hello !
Thanks a lot, i finally succeeded in installing
the most recent version by doing a boot with a
modified sarge-powerpc-bc-lbb.iso on my 7043-260.
The main problem was, that I didn't have a linux
machine, so I had to deal several things with a
windows pc.
The following steps made it:
get h
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:25:18PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:56:21AM -0300, Humberto Massa Guimar?es wrote:
> > ** Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ::
> > > possible solutions:
> > >
> > > * fix the bloody 2.6 kernel so it doesn't use so much damn memory.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 320817 pending
Bug#320817: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc/include/asm{,-ppc} symlinks
broken
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 321625 pending
Bug#321625: linux-2.6: [powerpc] does not include mkvmlinuz support
There were
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 03:06:21PM +0200, Haug Bürger wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
> Version: 2.6.12-1
> Severity: important
>
>
> th the 2.6.12 kernel the automount (GNOME desktop) doesn't work any more
> for my external USB harddisks. After connecting there is a message in the
> me
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:11:41AM +0100, Alexander Fisher wrote:
> On 8/2/05, Paulo Neves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > Hummm, I think this IBM computers don't like kernel 2.6 :).
> >
> > I install kernel 2.4.27 and until now works fine too.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Paulo
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
Hi, with current 2.6.12, the symlinks for asm-* are fine, and i belive it is
enough to ship -2 as is, as we don't have ppc64 kernels yet.
Now, the current setup includes asm-ppc and asm-ppc64 in the common kernel
header files, but the per flavour include only
Your message dated Mon, 8 Aug 2005 13:15:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel-source-2.6.9: 6to4 tunnel interface cannot be freed on
shutdown, causing hang
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On 8/2/05, Paulo Neves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Hummm, I think this IBM computers don't like kernel 2.6 :).
>
> I install kernel 2.4.27 and until now works fine too.
>
> Regards,
> Paulo
>
> On 8/2/05, Alexander Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Paulo Neves wrote:
>
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 10:11:21AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> I'm sorry but all that is over my head, beyond my level.
> All I know is that all the files in pool/main/l/linux-2.6/ need
> Descriptions that even the most bumblesome user could understand.
You are welcome to propose such description
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:15:57PM +0200, LT-P wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
> Version: 2.6.8-16
> Severity: normal
>
> The kernel-source-2.6.8 sources fail to compile on powerpc (PowerMac 4400).
>
> ___
> CC drivers/ide/ide.o
> CC drivers/ide/ide-default.o
> CC drivers/ide
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 01:33:24PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6-686
> Version: 2.6.5-2
> Severity: normal
>
>
> not one single one of the 2.6 kernels - 2.6.5, 2.6.6, 2.6.7, 2.6.8,
> 2.6.9, 2.6.10, 2.6.11 nor 2.6.12 - can be installed on a system with
> le
On Monday 08 August 2005 10:57, Sven Luther wrote:
> 4) in any case, the new ppc64 kernels will be SMP only, i am dropping the
> uniprocessor flavour on them.
AFAIK this should solve the problem with the symbios controller and make the
7043-260 both installable and usable (but i don't have the m
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 12:13:24PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 11:28:47AM +0200, Ralph wrote:
> > Hello !
> >
> > I'm new to this list, I'm Ralph from Germany.
> > I'm running into the same problem with sym53c8xx on my 7043-260.
> >
> > > i can now boot fine the machine with ker
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:57:22PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:55:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > - Each arch may specify an architectury specific patch, each image
> > package may specify another patch, it may shared between more than one
> > image.
>
> O
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 12:07:44PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:26:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > The problem is that the DAK will update linux-2.6, kernel-tree-x.y.z-n
> > and kernel-image packages without any regards to linux-kernel-di. They
> > will become
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:18:28PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:49:01PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> >> I tend to aggree, though I believe Franz Pop, or perhaps some of the
> >> other d-i team members have reason for keepi
48 matches
Mail list logo
