On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 09:00:01PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 10:47:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:57:22PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 07:55:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > > - Each arch may specify an architectury specific patch, each image > > > > package may specify another patch, it may shared between more than one > > > > image. > > > > > > Or fix the architectures to not require them. The mips changes are fine > > > for any other architecture, although they should be split into a few > > > more. The m68k patch as-is isn't, but we hope to have m68k compiling > > > from mainline sources soon after the 2.6.14 tree opens. > > > > I hope the powerpc/apus patch will be fine soon, but what about things like > > the (upcoming ?) powerpc/nubus patch ? > > Let's just work with the people to sort it out early enough. It's not > like it'll be stable enough for a distro as soon as the port is mostly > running anyway.
I have big hopes for the apus case to be cleanly integrated in the near future, but the nubus case is more problematic. But we will see. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
