On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:25:18PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:56:21AM -0300, Humberto Massa Guimar?es wrote: > > ** Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton :: > > > possible solutions: > > > > > > * fix the bloody 2.6 kernel so it doesn't use so much damn memory. > > > > > > * fix the debian-specific, debian-created and debian-responsible > > > initrd ramdisk so it doesn't require so much damn memory. > > > > > > * provide an alternate "compact" ramdisk if fixing the "default" > > > ramdisk isn't a viable option. > > > > Remember Debian is a volunteer-driven organization. Implement the features > > you need yourself and then ask (politely) for the inclusion of your > > contribution. Or, you can ask (more politely still) for someone more > > knowledgeable than you (like Horms) to implement one of your suggestions. > > But what you should NOT do is to demand features like your e-mail seemed to. > > if you read it carefully, you will note that the wording > doesn't make any demands. it _does_ however hint at some socially > uncomfortable responsibilities.
Luke, do you have an idea of what exactly is the problem with 2.6 kernels and low memory support ? Could you describe it, especially since i believe it is only a problem related on how the initrd is generated, and the fact that initrd-tools creates insanely big initrds by default ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
