Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 291039 kernel-source-2.6.10
Bug#291039: kernel-patch-debian-2.6.10: bashism in apply file
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-patch-source-2.6.10'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-patch-source-2.6.10' to
`kernel-source-2.6.10'.
> reassign 291
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:17:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290013: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:17:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289517: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:17:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289202: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:17:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#288272: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:17:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285563: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:17:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#288712: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:17:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#288046: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Accepted:
kernel-doc-2.4.27_2.4.27-8_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-doc-2.4.27_2.4.27-8_all.deb
kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27_2.4.27-8_all.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27_2.4.27-8_all.deb
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-8.diff.gz
to pool/main/
Accepted:
kernel-build-2.4.27-2_2.4.27-8_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386/kernel-build-2.4.27-2_2.4.27-8_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-386_2.4.27-8_i386.deb
to
pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386/kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-386_2.4.27-8_i386.deb
kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-586tsc
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:17:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285521: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:17:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#288279: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:17:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289682: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:17:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290039: fixed in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-8.dsc
kernel-image-2.4.27-i386_2.4.27-8.tar.gz
kernel-headers-2.4.27-2_2.4.27-8_i386.deb
kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.27-2-586tsc_2.4.27-8_i386.deb
kernel-
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-8.dsc
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-8.diff.gz
kernel-patch-debian-2.4.27_2.4.27-8_all.deb
kernel-doc-2.4.27_2.4.27-8_all.deb
kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-8_all.deb
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:46:39PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 08:41:26PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:24:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:27:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-10 16:2
tags 291039 +pending
tags 291107 +pending
thanks
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 12:31:26PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > With some good will you can read this from:
> >
> > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_06_03
> > ---
> > If the command substitution consists
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 05:11:23PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 04:15:26PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 07:48:38PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> > > When I tried to build kernel 2.6.10 from debian source, I got
> > > following message.
> > >
> > > /usr/src/k
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:15:02 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#283164: 2.6.10 fixed?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
reassign 87939 kernel-source-2.4.27
thanks
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:21:28PM +0100, Maurits van Rees wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-i386
> Followup-For: Bug #287939
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I saw reports for Palm trouble with kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k7. I have a
> K6 so I installed kernel-image-2.4.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 08:28:00PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 07:25:21PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > | Complete agreement here. We're still looking for a volunteer, though
> >
reassign 291386 initrd-tools
thanks
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 02:17:34PM +0100, Eric Deplagne wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686
> Version: 2.4.27-7
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> When the install of kernel-image tries to create initrd,
> those lines go t
Your message dated Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:16:36 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291357: kernel-source-2.4.27: SIGHUP not being sent when
controlling process exits
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
This bug is exactly the same as bug 282234 in 2.6.9, and it has the
same fix. You need to edit drivers/video/vesafb.c and move line 480
(which reads "module_init(vesafb_init);") outside of the #ifdef
MODULE. I move it up to line 474 and everything works just
fine. Perhaps the debian patch can be fi
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:23:29AM +0100, Joan Andersen og Jesper Gertz wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have the same problem:
>
>
> Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686
> Version: 2.4.27-6
> OS version: Testing
>
> My connection tops off at 1K.
> My external 56K modem is connected to ttys0.
> It doesn't mat
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:11:14PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > I have no idea about the abichanges, m68k uses no abiname? Is that a
> > > problem?
> > The downside of not includeing an abiname in the package name is that
> > past d-i releases will break once the updated kernels and
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-i386
Followup-For: Bug #287939
Hi,
I saw reports for Palm trouble with kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k7. I have a
K6 so I installed kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k6. I got the same problem. So
it is probably good that this bug is mentioned in the bug list for
kernel-image-2.4.27-i38
Package: kernel-source-2.6.10
Version: 2.6.10-4
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-actusa
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:58:10PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > I uploaded new 2.6.8 kernel-images for m68k a week ago, but I did not make
> > it
> > urgent...: Too young, only 7 of 10 days old
> > For 2.4.27 I am waiting for the latest kernel-source to be released be
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 10:25:47PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:13:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > Update for current status, 10 days after my first mail:
> >
> > m68k
> > No abiname; not updated. ?
> >
> > [This is another arch that I'd consider
Christian T. Steigies wrote:
[snip]
> I uploaded new 2.6.8 kernel-images for m68k a week ago, but I did not make it
> urgent...: Too young, only 7 of 10 days old
> For 2.4.27 I am waiting for the latest kernel-source to be released before I
> build new images. This is supposed to happen today/tomor
Horms wrote:
[snip]
> I have made both kernel-source-2.4.27 and kernel-image-2.4.27-i386 up on
> http://debian.vergenet.net/pending/ for people to take a look at.
Builds fine for mips, images soon available at
http://people.debian.org/~ths/mips-kernels/kernel-patch-2.4.27-mips/
Thiemo
--
To U
Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> I uploaded new 2.6.8 kernel-images for m68k a week ago, but I did not make it
> urgent...: Too young, only 7 of 10 days old
> For 2.4.27 I am waiting for the latest kernel-source to be released before I
> build new images. This is supposed to happen today/tomorrow? I
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:13:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> Update for current status, 10 days after my first mail:
>
> m68k
> No abiname; not updated. ?
>
> [This is another arch that I'd consider releasing d-i rc3 without
> it being updated for the kernel security fixes.]
Paul Coray wrote:
> The latest patches for kernel 2.6.9rc2 can be found at
> http://acl.bestbits.at/nfsacl/ (not linked on homepage).
The usual way to get feature patches in the debian kernel is by sending
them upstream to kernel.org. The "known problems" section on that
webpage suggests there's
Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 02:59:00PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > initrd-tools 0.1.76 changed to abort on install to LVM if dmsetup was
> > not installed. I think this was a mistake. I'm ccing tbm, who made the
> > change.
>
> I made the change.
Right, tbm only committed
Joey Hess wrote:
> Before we can release d-i rc3 we need all the kernels updated with at
> least some security fixes, notably the ones that change the kernel
> module ABI, and we need to update things to reflect the new kernel
> "abiname". Here's my understanding of the current status of that:
Upd
I had problem compiling 2.4.18 vanilla kernel. I am
currently using gcc-3.3. I was wondering is there a
way to have two compilers on the same machine (I
suppose apt-get gcc-2.95 would do the job), and then
switch between them elegantly when needed. Gentoo has
a cute tool called gcc-config. Is there
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 02:59:00PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> initrd-tools 0.1.76 changed to abort on install to LVM if dmsetup was
> not installed. I think this was a mistake. I'm ccing tbm, who made the
> change.
I made the change.
> This was apparently added as part of a patch to support encryp
severity 291362 serious
reassign 291362 initrd-tools
thanks
Lupe Christoph wrote:
> Kernel installation (2.4.27) failed because the initrd could not be
> generated. dmsetup is missing.
>
> Root is on a DM device, but dmsetup not installed
> Failed to create initrd image.
>
> Same happens with 2.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 07:25:21PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> | Complete agreement here. We're still looking for a volunteer, though
> | ;-)
> |
> |
>
> Come on! I had offered to take over initrd-tools several
> mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
| Complete agreement here. We're still looking for a volunteer, though
| ;-)
|
|
Come on! I had offered to take over initrd-tools several
months ago. I am sure that there would be several other
volunteers.
But a big part of the
The latest patches for kernel 2.6.9rc2 can be found at
http://acl.bestbits.at/nfsacl/ (not linked on homepage).
Greets
Paul
--
Paul Coray
Administrator Server und Netzwerk
Oeffentliche Bibliothek der Universitaet Basel
EDV-Abteilung
Schoenbeinstrasse 18-20
CH-4056 Basel
Tel: +41 61 267 05 13
Fax:
Hi,
CONFIG_AUDIT is required to have Se-Linux be usefully
deployed, since without tht we can't even test any other aspect of
Se-Linux functionality in the Debian kernel image packages. Without
audit, any modifications needed to policy are hard to discover, since
policy violations are j
tags 291357 +sarge
thanks
Russell Stuart wrote:
> Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
> Version: 2.4.27-6
> Severity: important
[snip]
> drivers/char/tty_io.c, line 768, contains this line:
>
> /* tty_deferred_ldisc_switch(N_TTY);
>
> Note: no trailing "*/".
This is fixed in 2.4.27-7.
Thiemo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 291357 +sarge
Bug#291357: kernel-source-2.4.27: SIGHUP not being sent when controlling
process exits
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
I have the same hardware as Florent (Athlon, ASUS VIA, Adaptec RAID),
and I'm running into the same bug. That is, the kernel sees my Adaptec
RAID disk fine (presented as SCSI, aacraid driver), but it doesn't see
any of my IDE disks.
I have done some experiments to try to pin down the location of
It appears the example I gave happens on a working
kernel as well. This one doesn't:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ssh 10.7.0.3
Linux titan.brisbane.lube 2.4.27-6-lube-686-smp #1 SMP Thu Jan 13
16:01:29 EST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps -fu $LOGNAME
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686
Version: 2.4.27-7
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
When the install of kernel-image tries to create initrd,
those lines go to /var/log/messages:
Jan 20 09:39:39 fregate kernel: device-mapper: unknown block ioctl 0x801c6d02
Jan 20 09:39:4
Please note that it would be good if this patch were applied to the 2.6
kernel that releases with sarge; otherwise users of sarge may encounter
bug #288423.
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
Complete agreement here. We're still looking for a volunteer, though
;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.76
Severity: wishlist
If someone ever tried initrd tools for debian and red hat
you'l find a "little" difference .
With red hat tools you can do whatever you want and to customize
initrd image the way you want very easy.
IN other way the dabian mkinitrd is very
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 269823 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386
Bug#269823: hpt366 module makes ide drive not show up in /dev/discs/ (devfs)
until manually accessed
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 266872 kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686
Bug#266872: ohci1394 doesn't load this `Ricoh Co Ltd R5C552 IEEE 1394
Controller'
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686' to
`kernel-image-2
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
Version: 2.4.27-6
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-6-lube-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of p
Package: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686
Version: 2.6.10-4
Severity: normal
Preliminary note: this didn't happen with 2.6.9.
When suspending to RAM for a quite long time (like, the whole night),
at wake up time, the clock is far ahead. It seems to be running twice as
fast, actually, because it was 10 h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 291348 important
Bug#291348: kernel-image-2.6.8: SiS USB 1.0 Controller Fails in Bulk Transport
with, 2.6.8, fixed in 2.6.10
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 08:41:26PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:24:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:27:20PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-10 16:24]:
> > > > As far as I know, no other arches except amd64 (not
59 matches
Mail list logo
