I just tried a fresh install of Sid & KDE. Package "kde" refused to
install, (although "kdebase" did install), because of a couple
nonessential packages. How can this be overcome?
I did a fresh install of Woody.
Then: apt-get install dist-upgrade- to Sid.
then used tasksel to install X
Tha
Thanks! One quick question as I start to work on your suggestion:
--- Brian Bilbrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ran into this last weekend. The problem at that time was that libkmid
> is dependent explicitly on libglib1.3-12. That's not available any more,
> being superceded by libglib1.3-13.
--- Brian Bilbrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 01:40:55AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I just tried a fresh install of Sid & KDE. Package "kde" refused to
> > install, (although "kdebase" did install), because of a couple
> > nonessential packages. How can this be
KDE-Debian HowTo for KDE2 & Debian3=Woody X86. Ver 0.27
By tluxt 020217
STATUS: "kde" has been uninstallable for about a week. :(
It appears the kde metapackage has been been uninstallable for about
a week. ccheney also hasn't responded to my status request for more
than a week. I regard thi
Chris - would you please post a very brief status message to the list
twice a week, telling readers what the status of your kde packaging
effort is, and what potential problems installers might encounter,
and how to get around those problems? Those few minutes of you time
would save many many hour
Ok, since I can't get the 'kde' metapackage in Sid to install, I did a
apt-cache show kde (I think)
and saw a bunch of depends and suggests.
So, to get as much of the functionality of the 'kde' package as is possible,
should I just go through and install by hand all those depends packages?
Ok
ccheney is MIA for > 1 week with no advance notice of planned absence
kde metapackage in Sid doesn't install
fails on libkmid - libkmid: Depends: libglib1.3-12 (>= 1.3.12)
fails on libglib1.3-12 (>= 1.3.12) is not available
fails on kdebase-audiolibs
fails on libkmid or libkmid-alsa
--- Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I made a new kdelibs 2.2.2-12 upload tonight. It changes quite a bit.
> I will be uploading new packages for kdebase and others asap. I have
> been quite busy with my CS classes recently, but I hope that will calm
> down soon.
Hi, Glad to see you ba
Hi ben,
I read your message with some interest. In order to help me give you a
response on par with your interest, will you please provide me some
clarification about some things that are ambiguous to me about your message?
TIA.
1st: One ambiguity in your message is whether your message is (pl
Hi ben,
I have ready your message (below).
I am sending you this note because, based on your very last comment below, I am
concerned that somewhere along the communication channel part of the message I
sent to you did not get to you. (See below.)
--- ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesda
The first sentence in my previous message should have been:
I have read your message (below).
not
> I have ready your message (below).
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
--- Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:28:40AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> > I'm willing to do an NMU if there really is a dpendency problem (and Chris
> > doesn't object) but is there really a problem?
> >
> > I have libglib1.3-12 installed and I was also abl
Thanks for your quick reply! :)
I've got a couple questions:
--- Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 09:58:34PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > So: did you do the dinstall?
> > Is the fix now in the Sid package pool (and hence should have been
> available to
> >
--- Simon Hepburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 21 Feb 2002 7:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > metapackage will be the last thing I fix since it depends on every other
> > > package.
> >
> > OK. So, approximately when (# days) do y
--- Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The current status of KDE in Woody is less then perfect. kdenetwork
> ...
> I'm getting worried that the KDE not will make it into Woody. The
> release maintainer have already started to remove buggy packages from
> Woody, and several of the
Daniel Stone wrote:
> "No."
>
> This is my short and canonical response to this question. Chris Cheney
> is working on taking over KDE2.2, and he's redoing the packaging from
> scratch (thank god), so it may take some time. We know about the issues
> already, and are working on them. I'm mainly foc
Thanks. Great list.
--- Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As everyone else on this list knows dates like are meaningless since
> it is impossible to predict what will come up and I do have lots of
> outside pressures that will take away some time. However, if you want
I think, rather th
--- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 09:51:44PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> > Is there any chance that the meta-kde package can make it into testing
> > before release?
> >
> > Sorry, this has probably been asked many many times... (where's the
> > answer,
--- Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> kdelibs - should go into woody once m68k builds
> kdebase - should go into woody once m68k, arm, mips builds
>
> kdeadmin - should go into woody once arm, m68k, s390, sparc builds
> kdegraphics - needs new upload to remove kamera
> k
--- Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wanna-build status for different archs
>
> kdebase - m68k dep-wait - mips building (stuck?)
> kdeadmin - m68k building (stuck?)
> kdemultimedia - m68k building (stuck?)
> kdenetwork- hppa building (stuck?) - m68k failed - sparc needs-b
Thanks Daniel. A few follow ups:
--- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 02:43:35PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > As far as now installing kde for i386 is concerned:
> >
> > You mention that kdegraphics and kdeutils need new uploads. Are there
> > currently o
There is currently a most excellent email (that I just wrote) in the
debian-user list that you might like to read and lend your support to.
RFC & FR2nd - New debian3-user & debian3-user-hardware mail lists
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2002/debian-user-200204/msg00488.html
Since KDE 2.2 dep
22 matches
Mail list logo
