Hi,
For about a week now, the upgrade of libavutil52 and libswscale2 is held back
because the latest version of libavutil52 conflicts with libavutil51, which is
required by nepomuk-core-runtime. The libavutil52 library is needed by vlc-
nox, which is needed by phonon-backend-vlc.
The resolution
Hi,
Alle venerdì 19 luglio 2013, Diederik de Haas ha scritto:
> For about a week now, the upgrade of libavutil52 and libswscale2 is
> held back because the latest version of libavutil52 conflicts with
> libavutil51, which is required by nepomuk-core-runtime. The
> libavutil52 library is needed by
On Friday 19 July 2013 11:41:52 Pino Toscano wrote:
> libavutil52 exists only in experimental... and in deb-multimedia, and
> also vlc does. This means you are using vlc from deb-multimedia,
No, I'm not using vlc from deb-multimedia (I do have other programs like
handbrake from deb-multimedia t
Alle venerdì 19 luglio 2013, Diederik de Haas ha scritto:
> On Friday 19 July 2013 11:41:52 Pino Toscano wrote:
> > libavutil52 exists only in experimental... and in deb-multimedia,
> > and also vlc does. This means you are using vlc from
> > deb-multimedia,
>
> No, I'm not using vlc from deb-mult
On Friday 19 July 2013 12:18:19 Pino Toscano wrote:
> Ok then; just to tule out any other deb-multimedia issue, could you
> please check the output of
> $ dpkg -l '*' | grep ^ii | grep -- -dmo
$ dpkg -l '*' | grep ^ii | grep -- -dmo
ii handbrake-cli 0.9.9-dmo3
Alle venerdì 19 luglio 2013, Diederik de Haas ha scritto:
> On Friday 19 July 2013 12:18:19 Pino Toscano wrote:
> > Ok then; just to tule out any other deb-multimedia issue, could you
> > please check the output of
> > $ dpkg -l '*' | grep ^ii | grep -- -dmo
>
> $ dpkg -l '*' | grep ^ii | grep --
On Friday 19 July 2013 12:59:25 Pino Toscano wrote:
> If you really want deb-multimedia in your repositories (which I do not
> recommend), then you should better use apt's pinning to give to the
> suites of this repository priorities lower than the ones for the main
> archive (this implies also rai
Thanks Kevin. I think this is what is broken. It's got a split brained
config. So let me ask this...Which is a better backend? PostgresQL, MySQL
or SQLITE? My understanding is that sqlite is not as heavy as mysql, at the
cost of one thread (or query) at a time. Having said that, I know nothing
abou
On Friday 19 July 2013 08:22:03 Brad Alexander wrote:
> Which is a better backend? PostgresQL, MySQL or SQLITE?
MySQL is (by far) the most tested. PostgreSQL should probably work too (but
haven't tried it). SQLite is AFAIK 'too light' for nepomuk/akonadi.
> And if MySQL is the right answer, can
Thanks Dederik,
Actually, a while back, I had figured out a way to change mysql to mariadb.
It was ugly and kludgey, but the couple of times I tried it, it worked.
Mariadb is truly a drop-in replacement, from the new tests I have done. I'm
not a DBA, but it works underneath things like Nagios...
10 matches
Mail list logo
