I'm sure the Debian KDE devs will already be in the loop, but it was
news to me when I just found out, and I see no mention of it on this
list, so just for the archives (and anyone else who hasn't yet heard) :
http://lists.kde.org/?l=koffice-devel&m=128782551919625&w=2
ht
Hi everybody,
KOffice 2.2.1 and its translations will be available from unstable in
a few hours. The upload has been made for AMD64, it might take some hours
more for others arches.
Keep in mind the different level of maturity of the applications and
remember: file upstream at https
Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Freitag 28 Mai 2010 schrieb Ana Guerrero:
>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 04:14:00PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>> > KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 & i386 from the semi-official
>> > repository at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/
>>
Hi Ana and Cyrille,
Am Freitag 28 Mai 2010 schrieb Ana Guerrero:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 04:14:00PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 & i386 from the semi-official
> > repository at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/
>
> You have now availa
Hello,
On sekmadienis 30 Gegužė 2010 13:32:11 Jakub Nowacki wrote:
> I have a question about Koffice semi-offcial repository : is it safe to use
> it with testing release? I would like to test Koffice 2.2, but i don't
> want to destroy/mess my desktop.
It should be safe. In an
First of all thank you very much for your work and packaging KDE for Debian
:-)
I have a question about Koffice semi-offcial repository : is it safe to use it
with testing release? I would like to test Koffice 2.2, but i don't want to
destroy/mess my desktop.
Thanks,
Jakub.
-
Am Samstag 29 Mai 2010 schrieb kap4lin:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 & i386 from the semi-official
> > repository at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/
> >
> > It is still to be decided if KOffice 2.2.0 w
Am Freitag 28 Mai 2010 schrieb Ana Guerrero:
> Currently my opinion is the less mature apps are not in worse shape
> that the koffice 1.6 shipped in Lenny, while the more mature apps
> seems to be superior to those in Lenny.
From my subjective impression so far I tend to agree with that
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 02:07:58PM -0400, kap4lin wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> >
> > KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 & i386 from the semi-official
> > repository
> > at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/
> >
> > It i
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>
> KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 & i386 from the semi-official repository
> at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/
>
> It is still to be decided if KOffice 2.2.0 will make it into Squeeze, I am
> currently inclined to do
Ana Guerrero wrote:
>> If it is not too much work, I would suggest to put krita and karbon in
>> Squeeze and the other packages in another repository when they will be
>> usable. Then, you will add a line in koffice, karbon and krita packages
>> description (looks
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 04:14:00PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>
> KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 & i386 from the semi-official repository
> at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/
>
You have now available also the localization packages [1], and also the small
application based in k
ed are very low.
> If it is not too much work, I would suggest to put krita and karbon in
> Squeeze and the other packages in another repository when they will be
> usable. Then, you will add a line in koffice, karbon and krita packages
> description (looks like nobody read READM
Ana Guerrero wrote:
> KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 & i386 from the semi-official
> repository at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/
thanks for that!
> ...
> It is still to be decided if KOffice 2.2.0 will make it into Squeeze, I am
> currently inclined to do so. However,
Am Mittwoch 26 Mai 2010 schrieb Ana Guerrero:
> KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 & i386 from the semi-official
> repository at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/
Great stuff. Saw it already. And now I can have Krita back. I would love to
see this going into Squeeze (not yet a well argum
KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 & i386 from the semi-official repository
at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/
These packages will arrive to the official archive soon, but since I need to get
some time to update the copyright file and they include new debs (kformula
shape and kexi), they need t
On Monday 29 March 2010 12:25:14 pm Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > If Squeeze dosen't ship with Koffice is it expected to make a showing in
> > backports fairly soon after the release? Keeping a Lenny install in
> > VirtualBox is not my preferred solution so I'd rather ke
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:51:22AM -0500, Joe Neal wrote:
> Is Squeeze going to ship with any version of Koffice at all? I have papers
> and
> documents going back nearly ten years in koffice formats and I will need to
> retain access to them from time to time.
>
> If Sq
Is Squeeze going to ship with any version of Koffice at all? I have papers and
documents going back nearly ten years in koffice formats and I will need to
retain access to them from time to time.
If Squeeze dosen't ship with Koffice is it expected to make a showing in
backports fairly
On Wednesday 30 December 2009 09:10:43 Jakub Nowacki wrote:
> > > Answering here as main package of KOffice in Debian
> > >
> > > KOffice 2, as suite, is not fully ready for the masses, it is not only
> > > my personal impression, you can read the s
> Answering here as main package of KOffice in Debian
> KOffice 2, as suite, is not fully ready for the masses, it is not only
> my personal impression, you can read the same in the KOffice 2.1 release
> announcement at [0] in bold:
> "should still only be used b
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:31:39PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On 2009-12-29 Jakub Nowacki wrote:
> > Hello!
> > Does anyone know when we can expect the new Koffice in Sid?
> > Is it so buggy that it must be kept in experimental since November? :-)
> >
> On 200
2009/12/29 Jakub Nowacki :
> Hello!
> Does anyone know when we can expect the new Koffice in Sid?
> Is it so buggy that it must be kept in experimental since November? :-)
>From my experience with it, yes it is!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On 2009-12-29 Jakub Nowacki wrote:
> Hello!
> Does anyone know when we can expect the new Koffice in Sid?
> Is it so buggy that it must be kept in experimental since November? :-)
>
> Thanks for info,
> Jakub.
>
On 2009-08-07 Modestas Vainius wrote:
> It is not in Sid bec
Hello!
Does anyone know when we can expect the new Koffice in Sid?
Is it so buggy that it must be kept in experimental since November? :-)
Thanks for info,
Jakub.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Dom 12 Abr 2009 16:23:13 Matthias escribió:
> Hi!
>
> When do you plan to move all KDE 4 applications to unstable?
>
> Because currently, e.g. amarok uses the .kde4 directory while the KDE base
> system uses .kde which is ... messy.
>
> regards
> matthias
It should not be doing that (at least n
Hi!
When do you plan to move all KDE 4 applications to unstable?
Because currently, e.g. amarok uses the .kde4 directory while the KDE base
system uses .kde which is ... messy.
regards
matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Hello,
2009 m. Sausis 22 d., ketvirtadienis, Alex Hermann rašė:
> Why do they conflict? They (should) have a different soname, so they should
> be co-installable.
They conflict because they are not "real" library packages and ship some data
too.
--
Modestas Vainius
signature.asc
Description
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Michael Musenbrock wrote:
> Hi,
> since Krita version 1:1.9.98.5-1 a dependency to libkdrcraw5 was added,
> which conflicts with libkdrcraw7 needed by digikam
> (2:0.10.0~beta8-0r1~1).
Why do they conflict? They (should) have a different soname, so they should
be co-
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 06:25:46PM +0100, Michael Musenbrock wrote:
> Hi,
> since Krita version 1:1.9.98.5-1 a dependency to libkdrcraw5 was added,
> which conflicts with libkdrcraw7 needed by digikam (2:0.10.0~beta8-0r1~1).
>
> So it's not possible to co-install Krita (and KO
Hi,
since Krita version 1:1.9.98.5-1 a dependency to libkdrcraw5 was added,
which conflicts with libkdrcraw7 needed by digikam (2:0.10.0~beta8-0r1~1).
So it's not possible to co-install Krita (and KOffice meta-pkg) with
digikam.
It's not a big hassle for me, because I don't
Hello,
pirmadienis 22 Gruodis 2008, Xavier Brochard rašė:
> I though we were talking about 4.1.3 and Koffice 1:1.9.98.3-1
> this discussion is very confusing! ;-)
It would not have been confusing if you actually read the subject. What's the
point to talk about non up-to-date koff
Le lundi 22 décembre 2008 12:03:36 Modestas Vainius, vous avez écrit :
> Hello,
>
> pirmadienis 22 Gruodis 2008, Xavier Brochard rašė:
> > I know I should have fill a bug Ana.
>
> ??? You should know that it only affects KDE 4.2. Filling bugs, huh?
I though we were talking ab
Hello,
pirmadienis 22 Gruodis 2008, Xavier Brochard rašė:
> I know I should have fill a bug Ana.
??? You should know that it only affects KDE 4.2. Filling bugs, huh?
--
Modestas Vainius
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
> > > > .../kde-icons-oxygen_4%3a4.1.85+svn898692-0r1_all.deb) ...
> > > > `/usr/share/icons/oxygen/16x16/actions/object-order-front.png', which
> > > > is also in package koffice-data
> > > > koffice-data is at version 1:1.9.98.3-2, and I'm on a
> `/usr/share/icons/oxygen/16x16/actions/object-order-front.png', which is
> > > also in package koffice-data
> > > koffice-data is at version 1:1.9.98.3-2, and I'm on an amd64 system.
>
> > Thansk for reporting, I am aware of this issue, but package is made for
Le vendredi 19 décembre 2008 19:41:04 Ana Guerrero, vous avez écrit :
> > Preparing to replace kde-icons-oxygen 4:4.1.3-1 (using
> > .../kde-icons-oxygen_4%3a4.1.85+svn898692-0r1_all.deb) ...
> > `/usr/share/icons/oxygen/16x16/actions/object-order-front.png', which is
>
de-icons-oxygen 4:4.1.3-1 (using
> > ..
> > dpkg: error processing
> > ...
> >
> > > trying to overwrite
> >
> > `/usr/share/icons/oxygen/16x16/actions/object-order-front.png', which is
> > also in package koffice-data
> > ...
> > I c
a4.1.85+svn898692-0r1_all.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement kde-icons-oxygen ...
>
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/kde-icons-oxygen_4%3a4.1.85+svn898692-0r1_all.deb
> (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite
> `/usr/share/icons/oxygen/16x16/actions/object-order-f
Xavier Brochard wrote:
> Just remove, by hand,...
Sorry, I was unclear.
I was merely trying to point out that the problem existed, and was not
work-aroundable by keeping back, pinning or downgrading any existing
packages, with the exception of a fairly big downgrade for *all* of koffice.
ng to overwrite
> `/usr/share/icons/oxygen/16x16/actions/object-order-front.png', which is
> also in package koffice-data
> ...
> I can't keep kde-icons-oxygen at a previous version as a workaround, as its
> dependents require that version or greater. The only workaround f
e/apt/archives/kde-icons-oxygen_4%3a4.1.85+svn898692-0r1_all.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite
`/usr/share/icons/oxygen/16x16/actions/object-order-front.png', which is
also in package koffice-data
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
koffice-data is at version 1:1.9.98.3-
Ooops, my roommate had Ffox with his Google session opened and I
didn't notice I was writing from his account...
Well, just for clarifying the former message was mine. Thanks again, Lisandro.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Yes, clear and consice. Me sirve perfectamente, :). Thanks. I'll wait
some few days for beta 4.
I hope one of these days to have enough time and "guts" to learn how
to package by myself and contribute a bit instead of "parasiting"
y'all, volunteers, hehe.
Saludos
--
Vir prudens non contra ventum
On Sunday 07 December 2008 03:47:49 Carlos Álvarez wrote:
> Excuse the off-topic question, as Koffice is not a part of KDE, but
> does anyone know if there's a Debian list for Koffice? I haven't been
> able to find one, and I'd want to read something about how i
Excuse the off-topic question, as Koffice is not a part of KDE, but
does anyone know if there's a Debian list for Koffice? I haven't been
able to find one, and I'd want to read something about how isn't
Koffice beta 3 in Experimental when it was released almost 3 weeks
ago. N
El Viernes, 24 de Agosto de 2007, Jose Pablo Ferrero escribió:
> Hello,
>
> I have just installed KOffice in Etch. KPresenter is unable to open .ppt
> files because the ppt filter is not installed. In debian package list i
> dont found .ppt filter for KOffice but downloading t
Hello,
I have just installed KOffice in Etch. KPresenter is unable to open .ppt files
because the ppt filter is not installed. In debian package list i dont
found .ppt filter for KOffice but downloading the sources such filter
exists. There is any reason why .ppt filter is not included in
Spam detection software, running on the system "mfc.musees-franchecomte.com",
has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator
want direct PDF
> export. It was possible in the past, but know I come back to koffice,
>
> Would you have any hint?
> Thank you.
Hello Rakotomandimby!
Easiest way to get a PDF probably would be to print it to a PDF via
KDEPrint. Open the print window in KWord and then choose "Print to
Hi,
I run Sid and my kword does not list PDF as exportable format when I try to
export a typed document.
Is there a package I should install for that?
It lists Tex and PS but I dont want that, I just want direct PDF export.
It was possible in the past, but know I come back to koffice,
Would
possible in the past, but
know I come back to koffice, [...]
Content analysis details: (6.6 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
-- --
0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HEL
El Domingo, 22 de Octubre de 2006 13:18, Isaac Clerencia escribió:
> On Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:24, Blazej Kaczorowski z interia.pl wrote:
> > is any1 working on putting 1.6 koffice packages to debian sid?
>
> I uploaded koffice 1.6 to experimental yesterday.
>
>
On Thursday, 19 October 2006 20:24, Blazej Kaczorowski z interia.pl wrote:
> is any1 working on putting 1.6 koffice packages to debian sid?
I uploaded koffice 1.6 to experimental yesterday.
Testers are welcome :)
Best regards
--
Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://www.warp.es
Work: <
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe skrev:
On 10/19/06, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Torsdag 19 oktober 2006 20:24 skrev Blazej Kaczorowski z interia.pl:
> is any1 working on putting 1.6 koffice packages to debian sid?
Nah.. It's not worth the effort.
Why is it not wo
On Thursday 19 October 2006 20:56, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> Torsdag 19 oktober 2006 20:24 skrev Blazej Kaczorowski z interia.pl:
> > is any1 working on putting 1.6 koffice packages to debian sid?
>
> Nah.. It's not worth the effort.
Uh??
On Thursday 19 October 2006 20:24, Blazej Kaczorowski z interia.pl wrote:
> is any1 working on putting 1.6 koffice packages to debian sid?
Yes, packages are almost ready but I've been a bit busy lately. I'll announce
here when they're uploaded.
Best regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On 10/19/06, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Torsdag 19 oktober 2006 20:24 skrev Blazej Kaczorowski z interia.pl:
> is any1 working on putting 1.6 koffice packages to debian sid?
Nah.. It's not worth the effort.
Why is it not worth the effort?
Torsdag 19 oktober 2006 20:24 skrev Blazej Kaczorowski z interia.pl:
> is any1 working on putting 1.6 koffice packages to debian sid?
Nah.. It's not worth the effort.
Anders
--
- Debian GNU/Linux - KDE 3.5.4 - KMail 1.9.4 -
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
is any1 working on putting 1.6 koffice packages to debian sid?
--
Jestes kierowca? To poczytaj! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f199e
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
I did apt-get install koffice
I rather expected some entries in the kde menu for the apps but no, so
tried:
$ kword
koffice (lib kofficecore): ERROR: Couldn't find the native MimeType in
kword's desktop file. Check yourinstallation !
$ kivio
koffice (lib kofficecore): ERROR: Cou
On Wednesday, 1 February 2006 14:55, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 February 2006 14:51, Žáček Kryštof wrote:
> > Good work but...
> >
> > Don't take me wrong - I am a big fan of Koffice. But this version can
> > hardly be called a betaversion:
> >
&
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 14:51, Žáček Kryštof wrote:
> Good work but...
>
> Don't take me wrong - I am a big fan of Koffice. But this version can
> hardly be called a betaversion:
>
> KWord:
> - normally typed text is scrambled will red-blue vertical lines. It made
Good work but...
Don't take me wrong - I am a big fan of Koffice. But this version can hardly be
called a betaversion:
KWord:
- normally typed text is scrambled will red-blue vertical lines. It made no
sense to proceed any further with testing.
Krita: I am putting high hopes in Krit
Hi, yesterday I uploaded KOffice 1.5 beta1[0] (updated to latest SVN) to:
http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/koffice-1.5/
and also to experimental.
I will upload it to unstable soon, but I would like to get some feedback from
users.
Best regards
[0] http://dot.kde.org/1138748394/
--
To
On Friday 20 January 2006 10:15, Andres Järv wrote:
> You mean the beta of KOffice?
No. :)
> According to the release plan on kde.org, I
> see that KOffice 1.5 is going to be released on March 22nd.
The beta is going to be released on 22nd and will be exactly the same except
for the b
Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> Hi, I've been working in koffice 1.5 alpha packages for Sarge
> (because they're required to create a klik package to put in a
> OpenDocument Fellowship CD this Monday).
>
> I've uploaded them to http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/koffice-1.5-
Hi, I've been working in koffice 1.5 alpha packages for Sarge
(because they're required to create a klik package to put in a OpenDocument
Fellowship CD this Monday).
I've uploaded them to http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/koffice-1.5-sarge/ so
you can test/enjoy them (only in Sarg
Sorry if I'm being repetitive or stupid, but does this mean it's also
available for amd64?
On Sunday 20 November 2005 15:39, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
>
> I would say you have not installed kword 1.4.2 :)
>
> kword 1.4.2 uses /usr/lib/libkformulalib.so.3.0.0 instead of
> libkformula.
>
> If you just did a apt-get install koffice it's quite possible that
&g
On Sunday, 20 November 2005 23:41, Bud Rogers wrote:
> Just now I installed kword specifically and it pulled in libwpd8 also.
> Kword runs just fine now. My humble apologies for leaping to
> conclusions.
No problem :)
--
Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://www.warp.es
Work: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sunday 20 November 2005 11:41, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> On Sunday, 20 November 2005 17:35, Bud Rogers wrote:
> > I added the alioth entry to my sources.list and upgraded koffice
> > last night. This morning I decided to take the new koffice for a
> > spin. Kspread work
On Sunday 20 November 2005 13:02, Nick Leverton wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 10:35:53AM -0600, Bud Rogers wrote:
> > ~$ /usr/bin/kword
> > koffice (lib kofficecore): WARNING: libkformula.so.3: cannot open
> > shared object file: No such file or directory
> > ~$
>
On Sunday, 20 November 2005 22:13, Bud Rogers wrote:
> I interpret that to mean that, like libkformula, libkospell was there
> until I installed the new koffice debs. Am I reading that correctly?
>
> And BTW, I mean no offense to Isaac. He has gone to some trouble to
> upload th
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 10:35:53AM -0600, Bud Rogers wrote:
> ~$ /usr/bin/kword
> koffice (lib kofficecore): WARNING: libkformula.so.3: cannot open shared
> object file: No such file or directory
> ~$
> ~$ dlocate libkformula.so.3
> koffice-libs: /usr/lib/libkformula.so.3.
On Sunday, 20 November 2005 17:35, Bud Rogers wrote:
> I added the alioth entry to my sources.list and upgraded koffice last
> night. This morning I decided to take the new koffice for a spin.
> Kspread worked fine. Kword fails with this error:
>
> ~$ /usr/bin/kword
> koffic
On Saturday 19 November 2005 20:03, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> Hi, dear Debian KDE users.
>
> I've just uploaded a Sarge backport of Koffice 1.4.2 to
> http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/koffice-1.4.2-sarge/
>
> You can just add:
> deb http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/koff
Hi, dear Debian KDE users.
I've just uploaded a Sarge backport of Koffice 1.4.2 to
http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/koffice-1.4.2-sarge/
You can just add:
deb http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/koffice-1.4.2-sarge/ ./
to your /etc/apt/sources.list file and you should be able to install ko
Hey, just reviving an old thread, since I'm strangely loathe to start
new ones (old habits die hard...)
I was using KOffice Write, and I was using tables. I then inserted a
picture into the table and KWrite just died. No error code, no
nothing. I checked all the process tables in the
On 10/27/05, Jason Winzenried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Looking forward to krita maturing so we have a photoshop replacement and
> > > a paint replacement :)
> >
> > gimp works fine...
> >
>
> Of course it does, even if certain basic functions are arcane enough that some
> people don't know
Mark J. Small wrote:
> Looks like
> http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/debian/koffice/
Sorry, typo. Please, be aware that I will not support and they may vanish
any time without warning.
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09
If anybody is interested it is on
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/debs/koffice/
Matej
Looks like
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/debian/koffice/
is a more accurate link. Haven't tried them yet...
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
If anybody is interested it is on
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/progs/debs/koffice/
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
A fool-proof method for sculpting an elephant: first, get a huge
block of marble; then you
> Yeah, but we don't need kolourpaint then..
Two different apps. Kolourpaint is more of an mspaint clone, which is a very
different thing from a gimp replacement.
Kolourpaint doesn't do the advanced stuff krita does, so krita is necessary.
But there are times when the power of krita could b
>
> > See http://www.koffice.org/krita/
>
> Yeah, but we don't need kolourpaint then..
Maybe think of it differently: koffice is extra to KDE and some distribution
do not split up like Debian does (which is very nice).
So for krita, you have to install all of koffice on those (wh
On Monday 17 October 2005 19:41, Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
> > Also tongue in cheek, but it seems like painting apps are the same as
> > media apps - everybody thinks they can write one better than all the
> > rest, and everybody gives up sometime around the point that they hack
> > their favourite fea
> Also tongue in cheek, but it seems like painting apps are the same as
> media apps - everybody thinks they can write one better than all the
> rest, and everybody gives up sometime around the point that they hack
> their favourite feature into an otherwise awkward and incomplete program
Not every
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 11:20:58PM +0200, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> Being a bit tungue in cheek here.. :) Seems like every new kde version lately
> has brought us a new painting app.
Also tongue in cheek, but it seems like painting apps are the same as
media apps - everybody thinks the
On Friday 14 October 2005 08:11, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Freitag, 14. Oktober 2005 01:58 schrieb James Spencer:
> > Off the top of my head, there is kiconedit,
>
> That was already named by me and it's the only one I know that can also
> create MS Windows icons easily.
>
> > for editing icons,
On Thursday 13 October 2005 23:20, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> Just wondering, how many painting applications does this make in all of
> kde? Is there such a thing as too many painting applications in one desktop
> environment? Would it be possible for people to decide on perhaps just a
> c
Žáček Kryštof skrev:
All false. Krita is not yet another simplistic paint programm. It has the
potential to replace GIMP for those who are irritated by the archane, unusable
and slow GIMP gtk interface and deaf ears of GIMP developers.
Krita already supports CMYK, layers, ... you name it. It h
5 8:56 AM
> To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: KOffice 1.4.2 available
>
> Hendrik Sattler skrev:
>
> > What are the others? The only painting apps that I found
> worthwhile to
> > install so far was The Gimp and kiconedit.
>
> Actually there are onl
Hendrik Sattler skrev:
What are the others? The only painting apps that I found worthwhile to install
so far was The Gimp and kiconedit.
Actually there are only kolourpaint and kiconedit in kdegraphics. Now, I
will let kiconedit pass because it is rather specialised. But do we
really need bo
Am Freitag, 14. Oktober 2005 01:58 schrieb James Spencer:
> Off the top of my head, there is kiconedit,
That was already named by me and it's the only one I know that can also create
MS Windows icons easily.
> for editing icons, kolourpaint, as a simple paint program, and krita (now)
> as a full
Off the top of my head, there is kiconedit, for editing icons,
kolourpaint, as a simple paint program, and krita (now) as a fully
featured raster image editor... Each a different tool for a different
thing... Sheesh, I don't know what people's problems are with having
different tools for different
Am Donnerstag, 13. Oktober 2005 23:20 schrieb Anders Ellenshøj Andersen:
> Just wondering, how many painting applications does this make in all of
> kde?
What are the others? The only painting apps that I found worthwhile to install
so far was The Gimp and kiconedit.
HS
On Thursday 13 October 2005 22:21, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> > James Spencer has just reported the first bug, I moved a file from
> > kpresenter to koffice-libs but forgot to add a Replaces:, I'll fix it
> > soon and also will enable openexr support in krita.
>
> I'
Le Jeudi 13 Octobre 2005 19:22, Isaac Clerencia a écrit :
> Hi, people.
>
> I've just uploaded KOffice 1.4.2 to Sid , as it contains a new binary
> package (krita), it will get stuck in NEW for some time. In the meanwhile
> you can download it from:
> deb http://pkg-kde.al
On Thursday, 13 October 2005 19:39, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> On Thursday, 13 October 2005 19:22, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> > It has just been handed by the previous maintainer (Ben Burton) to the
> > Debian Qt/KDE team. As this has been my first day with koffice it's quite
&
On Thursday 13 October 2005 19:52, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> > Cool, but when do we see it in Unstable?
>
> Sid = unstable
What's your point?
pgpfcsmJvnZmO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 371 matches
Mail list logo
