On 10/27/05, Jason Winzenried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Looking forward to krita maturing so we have a photoshop replacement and > > > a paint replacement :) > > > > gimp works fine... > > > > Of course it does, even if certain basic functions are arcane enough that some > people don't know about it ;) > > I should have said Looking forward to krita maturing so *KDE* has a photoshop > replacement and a paint replacement :) Gimps interface does leave something > to be desired imho hehe
Well... It'd be a simple matter to just re-do the GIMP interface code so that it's using KDE instead of X or whatever it uses... I can't think why you'd want to do that, since what you really should be doing is make the kappfinder's way of letting non-KDE apps run in KDE work better, perhaps as a direct translation to kdelibs4 function calls (like making widgets and that rot) so that the apps that were written in other libraries were behaving just like normal KDE apps, know what I mean? I know I'm being vauge, but my mind is still buzzing for some strange reason... -- === GCB v3.1 === GCS d-(+) s+:- a? C+(++++) UL+++(++++) P L++(+++) E- W+(+++) N++ w--- M>++ PS-- PE Y+ PGP- t++(+++) 5? X? R !tv>-- b++>++++ DI+++>++++ D-- G !e h(*) !r x--- === EGCB v3.1 ===
