Re: KMail Reply time format changed

Erwan David - 26.03.25, 08:47:08 CET: > > Oh, seems %OTIMELONGEN gives me back what I had with %OTIMELONG. And > > given that, "CET" as I had before %OTIMELONG is not actually a > > translation at all. So seems what appeared like a bug to me first > > might be a feature: %OTIMELONG finally being tr

Re: KMail Reply time format changed

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 08:44:04AM CET, Martin Steigerwald said: > Hi! > > Patrick Franz - 25.03.25, 23:42:03 CET: > > Am Dienstag, 25. März 2025, 22:59:11 CET schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > > [...] > > > > > For now I hard code "CET/CEST" after "%OTIME" into the template (see > > > above). When

Re: KMail Reply time format changed

Hi! Patrick Franz - 25.03.25, 23:42:03 CET: > Am Dienstag, 25. März 2025, 22:59:11 CET schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > [...] > > > For now I hard code "CET/CEST" after "%OTIME" into the template (see > > above). Whenever I remember I delete the wrong one. > > There are probably better options, e.g

Re: KMail Reply time format changed

Hej, Am Dienstag, 25. März 2025, 22:59:11 CET schrieb Martin Steigerwald: [...] > For now I hard code "CET/CEST" after "%OTIME" into the template (see > above). Whenever I remember I delete the wrong one. There are probably better options, e.g. %OTIMELONGEN. Kmail offers you a list of all templa

Re: KMail Reply time format changed

Hi Frank, hi. Frank Mehnert - 12.03.25, 11:26 CET/CEST: > I just realized that kmail2 6.3.2 uses a long format for inserting the > time including the name of the time zone when replying to an e-mail. > Just have a look at some of the recent answers in this mailing list, > e.g. the one from > Mart

Reply time format changed

Hi, I just realized that kmail2 6.3.2 uses a long format for inserting the time including the name of the time zone when replying to an e-mail. Just have a look at some of the recent answers in this mailing list, e.g. the one from Martin 2 days ago: > MERLIN Philippe - 10.03.25, 10:51:05 Mitteleu