2009/10/8 Vedran Furač :
> Is there any easy way of configuring style and colors of KDE3 apps (like
> kaffeine, k3b, basket,...) under KDE4 now that kcontrol is gone?
>
> Regards,
>
> Vedran
No. When we still had separate ~/.kde and ~/.kde4 directories for the
configuration files, it was possible
> Maybe you didn't install the konqueror package on Ubuntu but did so on SID?
In all cases, konqueror and khelpcenter (the KDE 4 versions) were installed.
Ben.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de
On Sunday, 2009-04-26, Ben Burton wrote:
> In the meantime, if anyone knows how debian has fixed the kfmclient
> problem where ubuntu hasn't, I'd still be interested -- I haven't
> yet worked out why this works in sid but not jaunty. The relevant
> function that's being called is KApplication::in
Hi again,
On further digging, it looks like the ubuntu people have fixed the
khelpcenter problem by patching kdelibs directly. The patch is quite
small (in KApplication::invokeHelp(), start khelpcenter directly instead
of using dcop).
I'll file a bug for this against debian's kdelibs shortly.
On 2008-10-17, Andreas Bourges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> ...I know it should be possible to run kde3 apps under kde4, but whenever I
> try to install kde3 apps on my sid box (kde4 from experimental) apt-get has
> dependency problems:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies
Hello Cae:
El Lunes, 3 de Marzo de 2008, Caesium 5 escribió:
> I am currently using Debian experimental with KDE4 and is is looking at the
> option of installing Debian with KDE3 on a usb thumb
> drive so that I can bring it and introduce it to friends wherever I go.
>
> Only the minimum package
Michael D. Ivey wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 01:40:21PM +0100, Nick wrote:
And going to http://wiki.debian.net/ gives me a page stating :
"Ivey & Brown, Inc. is a technology firm based in Atlanta,
Georgia that focuses on software process consulting,
system administration and software develop
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 01:40:21PM +0100, Nick wrote:
> And going to http://wiki.debian.net/ gives me a page stating :
>
> "Ivey & Brown, Inc. is a technology firm based in Atlanta,
> Georgia that focuses on software process consulting,
> system administration and software development usin
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 00:32:18 +0100, Paul Cupis wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Wednesday 09 July 2003 18:54, suresh Sharma wrote:
>> Hello,
>> can anyone tell me where can I find kde3 packages .
>
>Please read http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DebianKDE
Hmmm. For me,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 18:54, suresh Sharma wrote:
> Hello,
> can anyone tell me where can I find kde3 packages .
Please read http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DebianKDE
Regards,
Paul Cupis
- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ve
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 19:54, suresh Sharma wrote:
> Hello,
> can anyone tell me where can I find kde3 packages .
> thanks in advance
> suresh
In Sid
d'oh
--
Frank Van Dammehttp://www.openstandaarden.be
~~~~
"Je pense, donc je suis breveté."
El Miércoles, 9 de Julio de 2003 19:54, suresh Sharma escribió:
> Hello,
> can anyone tell me where can I find kde3 packages .
> thanks in advance
> suresh
Yes.
;o)
For woody:
http://www.kde.org/download/
For sid, use the official debian repositories.
And I don't want
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 09:31, Alex wrote:
> I'm crossposting in debian-kde, because maybe there, someone knows what
> is happening.
>
> El Martes, 24 de Junio de 2003 14:34, Curtis Vaughan escribió:
> > I have already added the line to my sources.list file, but there is no
> > libqt3-mt that is >=
werpc@lists.debian.org; debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: KDE3 in woody, powerpc arch
I'm crossposting in debian-kde, because maybe there, someone knows what is
happening.
El Martes, 24 de Junio de 2003 14:34, Curtis Vaughan escribió:
> I have already added the line to my sources.list file,
Le Mardi 24 Juin 2003 16:31, Alex a écrit :
> I'm crossposting in debian-kde, because maybe there, someone knows what
> is happening.
no.. i had to rebuild it for pwerpc myself. i will put my packages online by
thursday., i will keep you informed...
see ya
--
OpenSides sprl
Free Software Specia
I'm crossposting in debian-kde, because maybe there, someone knows what is
happening.
El Martes, 24 de Junio de 2003 14:34, Curtis Vaughan escribió:
> I have already added the line to my sources.list file, but there is no
> libqt3-mt that is >= 3.1.2, which is required according to other kde3
> f
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 10:25:01AM +1200, John Batistic wrote:
>
> 2. gdm can not see the KDE link in gdm/Sessions. I have to use the
> Debian logon choice to load KDE. What do I have to change to make gdm
> see the KDE link?
Have a look at /etc/gdm/Sessions/*
Scripts for different sessi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Donnerstag, 2. Januar 2003 21:55, Albrecht Gebhardt wrote:
> I'm in the process of building 3.0.5a debs for linux-alpha (on
> Debian/testing)
>
> From my earlier builds (3.0.2/3.0.4/3.0.5) I noticed, that the configure
> option "--enable-final" (whi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:01, Ben Burton wrote:
> And so I will nevertheless stick with the main point of my previous post
> which was, if we're going to use experimental, to argue for very clear
> documentation to be available on just what to do with APT
Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 20 October 2002 6:04 pm, Brian Nelson wrote:
>
>> That's what I said. I think Qt would be the only dependency that would
>> need to be recompiled. Presumably, you could use some name-mangling
>> scheme like attaching -gcc3.2 or something to t
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, tomas pospisek wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Ben Burton wrote:
> >
> > > Hi. I do have one strong concern with experimental which may be
> > > ill-founded,
> > > I'm not sure. It seems there are lots of inexperienced users out ther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 20 October 2002 6:04 pm, Brian Nelson wrote:
> That's what I said. I think Qt would be the only dependency that would
> need to be recompiled. Presumably, you could use some name-mangling
> scheme like attaching -gcc3.2 or something to the
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, tomas pospisek wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > Hi. I do have one strong concern with experimental which may be
> > ill-founded,
> > I'm not sure. It seems there are lots of inexperienced users out there
> > wanting to use KDE3 with debian, and I'm worri
On Sunday 20 October 2002 20:13, Michael Schuerig wrote:
> I didn't
> follow, who built the current packages and who's doing the official
> stuff. Are these the same people?
Yes, they are. I apparently overlooked it in the FAQ
(http://davidpashley.com/debian-kde/faq.html) when I first looked at i
Hi Brian,
> That's what I said. I think Qt would be the only dependency that would
> need to be recompiled. Presumably, you could use some name-mangling
> scheme like attaching -gcc3.2 or something to the Qt libraries and
> package name, in lieu of a real transition plan.
>
> I'll have to test t
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 05:29:24PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
>
>> Or, my variation of the question: Why not just build-depend on g++-3.2,
>> build the packages and their dependencies (anything other than Qt?)
>> explicitly with g++-3.2, and upload to unsta
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Ben Burton wrote:
> Hi. I do have one strong concern with experimental which may be ill-founded,
> I'm not sure. It seems there are lots of inexperienced users out there
> wanting to use KDE3 with debian, and I'm worried we'll have people just
> happily adding experimental t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I'm worried we'll have
> people just happily adding experimental to their sources.list and silently
> dragging in all sorts of *other* experimental packages that they didn't
> want and don't realise are experimental.
Ah, so thanks to Volker Schlech
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 05:29:24PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Or, my variation of the question: Why not just build-depend on g++-3.2,
> build the packages and their dependencies (anything other than Qt?)
> explicitly with g++-3.2, and upload to unstable or experimental. Once
You'd need to comp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> A very good start and something that could happen within hours would be
> for Karolina or a DD sponser to modify the Debian changelog for her
> packages and then upload to the normal debian archive.
With all gratitude for Karolina's work, as the fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi. I do have one strong concern with experimental which may be ill-founded,
I'm not sure. It seems there are lots of inexperienced users out there
wanting to use KDE3 with debian, and I'm worried we'll have people just
happily adding experimental t
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 05:29:24PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I know that is what is happening - what nobody has answered completely yet
> > is
> > WHY you can't put 2.95 compiled packages in to unstable at first and then
> > follow up later with 3
Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday 19 October 2002 4:48 pm, Noel Koethe wrote:
>
>>
>> We will still wait for the gcc 3.2 transition for unstable.
>
> I know that is what is happening - what nobody has answered completely yet is
> WHY you can't put 2.95 compiled packages in t
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 04:24:59PM +0200, Noel Koethe wrote:
> Does anybody see any problems if we will start with kde 3.1x builds/
> uploads for experimental?
A very good start and something that could happen within hours would be
for Karolina or a DD sponser to modify the Debian changelog for he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 19 October 2002 4:48 pm, Noel Koethe wrote:
>
> We will still wait for the gcc 3.2 transition for unstable.
I know that is what is happening - what nobody has answered completely yet is
WHY you can't put 2.95 compiled packages in to unst
On Saturday 19 October 2002 16:24, Noel Koethe wrote:
> Does anybody see any problems if we will start with kde 3.1x builds/
> uploads for experimental?
I'm very much in favor of this.
Not all KDE packages in Debian are maintained by the Debian KDE maintainers
(in fact, only a minority of them is
On Son, 20 Okt 2002, Mark Purcell wrote:
> > Does anybody see any problems if we will start with kde 3.1x builds/
> > uploads for experimental?
>
> That would be excellent if you would do that and quite suitable to
> upload the kde3.1x builds into unstable.
>
> It would also allow me to upload t
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 04:24:59PM +0200, Noel Koethe wrote:
> Does anybody see any problems if we will start with kde 3.1x builds/
> uploads for experimental?
That would be excellent if you would do that and quite suitable to
upload the kde3.1x builds into unstable.
It would also allow me to upl
On Sam, 19 Okt 2002, Martin Schulze wrote:
Hello,
I have to fully agree that it makes alot of sense if we use
experimental for kde3 stuff. We have lost alot of time since
kde3 released in which we could fix our packages and could
work on packages which base on kde3.
> > Yes, something like this.
ReMoin!
Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > > well, as much as this would work out, someone has to do the work
> > > actually. And regarding the experimental distribution - that brings your
> > > work environment to a highly unstable state, not to speak about the
> > > packagers having t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 19 October 2002 10:39, Martin Schulze wrote:
Moin Joey,
> Moin Ralf!
>
> Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > well, as much as this would work out, someone has to do the work
> > actually. And regarding the experimental distribution - that brings your
Moin Ralf!
Ralf Nolden wrote:
> well, as much as this would work out, someone has to do the work actually.
> And
> regarding the experimental distribution - that brings your work environment
> to a highly unstable state, not to speak about the packagers having to build
> the packages on this s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 17 October 2002 08:20, Arash Bijanzadeh wrote:
[snip]
> checking for libz... configure: error: not found. Check your installation
> and look into config.log
> *** failed ***
>
> any idea?
apt-get install zlib1g zlib1g-dev
Paul Cupis
-
I tried! But I have no idea about the result
I could not even create a new QT project with kdevelop
loading cache ./config.cache
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD co
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 04:28:27PM +0330, Arash Bijanzadeh wrote:
> I cann't install libqt3-dev on my woody3.0 KDE 3.0.3 because agt-get says:
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libqt3-dev: Depends: libmng-dev but it is not going to be installed
> Depend
On Wednesday 16 October 2002 14:40, Paul Cupis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 16 October 2002 10:35, Arash Bijanzadeh wrote:
> > After I installed KDE 3 my dselect stopped working giving an version
> > conflict error . How can solve it?
>
> What error exa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 16 October 2002 10:35, Arash Bijanzadeh wrote:
> After I installed KDE 3 my dselect stopped working giving an version
> conflict error . How can solve it?
What error exactly do you get? Can you run dselect at all? What version of KDE
did
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 13:25:28 +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
[...]
>The other thing is what version of Debian users want to run KDE on. I myself
>would prefer woody, although testing and unstable are fine, too.
FWIW, just to register an opinion, my interest is solely in non-beta
packages (just don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Experimental repositry idea is about damn time. Gnome2 have had it for a
> while now. We need a concerted "professional" effort to get KDE3 into
> the debian distribution.
Just for reference, this proposal with the experimental repository has very
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 01:25:28PM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> My idea would be better to create a debian.kde.org website to collect all
> this
> information and to host a permanent official build on ftp.kde.org. That can
> be the releases as they are plus additional applications that are provid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 13 October 2002 12:25 pm, Ralf Nolden wrote:
>
> Now, let's please be reasonable about what can be done easily and what is
> desireable. Have a quick look at the current state:
>
Could I just clarify something about objectives. It seems to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> The other thing is what version of Debian users want to run KDE on. I
> myself would prefer woody, although testing and unstable are fine, too.
Packages containing the latest stable KDE release should be provided for
woody.
KDE betareleases should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 13 October 2002 12:53, Mark Purcell wrote:
Hi Mark,
well, as much as this would work out, someone has to do the work actually. And
regarding the experimental distribution - that brings your work environment
to a highly unstable state, not
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 12:13:17PM +0100, David Pashley wrote:
> > Not having to fiddle around with font servers (at least with TT fonts)
> > was one of the coolest things about X4. The downside (as far as I have
> > been able to figure) is that you have restart X to take advantage of any
> > new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 06 October 2002 5:53 am, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:06:39AM +0100, David Pashley wrote:
> > don't use xfs. seriously. There is no reason these days to run a font
> > server if you just have a single machine. AIUI, you can't
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:06:39AM +0100, David Pashley wrote:
> don't use xfs. seriously. There is no reason these days to run a font server
> if you just have a single machine. AIUI, you can't use XRENDER with font
> servers, so you will be able to get anti-aliased text if you use one of the
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 04 October 2002 3:57 am, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> Problem: Dual Head setup using Xinerama.
>
> Additional system specs:
>
> Dell Precision 420
> Dual P3 1Ghz
> 1G Ram
> ATI Radeon 7500 (2x 1600x1200)
>
> So, I upgrade to kde3.0.3 using the kd3
On Friday 04 October 2002 04:57, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> Problem: Dual Head setup using Xinerama.
>
> Additional system specs:
>
> Dell Precision 420
> Dual P3 1Ghz
> 1G Ram
> ATI Radeon 7500 (2x 1600x1200)
>
> So, I upgrade to kde3.0.3 using the kd3.org link and restart kdm.
> When I login, things
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 02 October 2002 06:29, Arash Bijanzadeh wrote:
> I couldn;t find APT HOWTO can you give me the URL?
A google search for APT HOWTO throws up
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/index.en.html
as the first result.
Paul Cupis
-
Thanks a lot David :-)
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 16:10, David Richmond wrote:
> This is a bit of a wild guess because you did not say which unofficial KDE3
> packages you are attempting to use or what the rest of your system
> configuration is (debian version, in particular). I'm going to reply
This is a bit of a wild guess because you did not say which unofficial KDE3
packages you are attempting to use or what the rest of your system
configuration is (debian version, in particular). I'm going to reply at
length in the hopes that many lurking newbies may benefit from a post that
hits
Am Sonntag, 1. September 2002 22:46 schrieb Michael Pereira:
> What do I need to
> install?
I think apt-get install evolution will tell you what packages it
will install. Than just type evolutin in your konsole or make a
link on your Desktop.
ciao
gerhard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 29 August 2002 20:13, Tamas Nagy wrote:
> The KDE3 Debian info page tries to summarize the APT sources for
> KDE3 packages.
> The available packages and sources listcould be found at:
> http://mypage.bluewin.ch/kde3-debian/#APT .
> There
salvador lorenzo garces <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> para cuando el kde3 para debian woody??
>
> mandame la direccion de apt
Vea:
http://mypage.bluewin.ch/kde3-debian/
Radu Muschevici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have the same Problem here, although i start KDE from kdm.
> Strange thing, since my /etc/X11/.Xsession and Xsession.options
> haven't changed in the upgrade process. Debian woody system.
There's a bug in krdb which makes krdb erase all X resources.
On Mon, 05 Aug, 2002 at 06:07:45 +0200, Andreas Goesele wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded to KDE3 and mostly everything went smooth. The only
> problem I noticed so far (there will be others, no?) is that my
> .Xresources file isn't sourced in any longer.
>
> Any idea, what I can do that again .Xr
On Saturday 10 August 2002 08:10, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> Fatal server error:
> Caught signal 11. Server aborting
KNotify can of course not connect to the X server after it crashed.
Signal 11 means that there was a segmentation fault within XFree86.
Aside from this bug, the only popup window I kno
Andreas Goesele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> here is the third problem I encountered with KDE3 (3.0.2): I no longer
> can copy and paste between other applications and mc. (I didn't change
> mc when I changed from KDE2 to KDE3. And I have the problem also over
> a ssh connection to a mc of a diff
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 03:34:56PM +, Rob Andrews wrote:
> [Nicolai P Guba wrote in newsgate.debian.kde]
> > > Multiple versions of KDE can not be installed into the same hierarchy
> > > and this is not a limitation of Debian, it is a limitation of how KDE
> > > works. You can of course hav
[Nicolai P Guba wrote in newsgate.debian.kde]
> > Multiple versions of KDE can not be installed into the same hierarchy
> > and this is not a limitation of Debian, it is a limitation of how KDE
> > works. You can of course have one version in /usr and one somewhere
> > else like /opt or /usr/l
On Sunday 28 July 2002 11:06 pm, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 06:33:09PM +0100, John Gay wrote:
> > So what are the known working versions of GCC for compiling KDE3 with?
> >
> > I am looking to try my hand at building a Pentium-optimised box from
> > scratch. lfs uses GCC2.95.5 bu
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 06:33:09PM +0100, John Gay wrote:
> So what are the known working versions of GCC for compiling KDE3 with?
>
> I am looking to try my hand at building a Pentium-optimised box from scratch.
> lfs uses GCC2.95.5 but Debian provides both GCC2.95.5 and GCC3?
>
> I've also loo
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> It's encouraging to know that a feature such as --prefix to dpkg would be
> appreciated... just not quite sure whether begging is my forte \grin{}
>From what I know it takes long to get a feature into
(debian-base-infrastructure). Which is understandab
On Sunday 28 July 2002 12:09 pm, gerhard wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is there a point to discuss the way how kde is packaged at this
> time? Or are we wrong with our thinking about that issue?
From my point of view it is never the wrong time thinking about how things
could be improved ;)
> If not: Is t
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, gerhard wrote:
> Is there a point to discuss the way how kde is packaged at this
> time? Or are we wrong with our thinking about that issue?
> If not: Is there someone who intend to work on that kind of
> packaging KDE?
> If so: Is the only way to do that, compile kde from the
Hi All,
Is there a point to discuss the way how kde is packaged at this
time? Or are we wrong with our thinking about that issue?
If not: Is there someone who intend to work on that kind of
packaging KDE?
If so: Is the only way to do that, compile kde from the branch and
using chroot (I don't k
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> This would not be that much of a problem if dpkg would support different
> install root directories, maybe something like
>
> dpkg --prefix=/opt/kde/3.0.2 -i ...
>
> Am I barfing up the wrong tree here?
Such a feature would be _VERY_
On Tue 23 Jul 2002 14:23, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 July 2002 1:17 pm, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 12:56:15AM +0100, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> > -snip-
> >
> > > I don't understand. What has gcc 3.0.1 to do with it. It's not even
> > > in unstable and I have been run
On Saturday 27 July 2002 2:17 pm, Gerhard Gaussling wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 25. Juli 2002 14:51 schrieb Nikita V. Youshchenko:
> is there anybody who is planning to work on an unofficial
> deb-package of KDE 3.1 that could be set to /opt or something
> similar, to avoid conflicts with KDE 2.x ? I
Am Donnerstag, 25. Juli 2002 14:51 schrieb Nikita V. Youshchenko:
> > [...]
> Seems that the only way to make KDE2 and KDE3 coexist is to
> compile one of them from source, with KDEDIR set to somewhere
> away from /usr.
Hi,
is there anybody who is planning to work on an unofficial
deb-package o
> Multiple versions of KDE can not be installed into the same hierarchy
> and this is not a limitation of Debian, it is a limitation of how KDE
> works.
Could you please post more information on this ?
I see kdeinit and dcopserver version conflict, but I believe it is not too
hard to fix (e.g. i
On Thursday 25 July 2002 2:51 pm, Chris Cheney wrote:
> Multiple versions of KDE can not be installed into the same hierarchy
> and this is not a limitation of Debian, it is a limitation of how KDE
> works. You can of course have one version in /usr and one somewhere
> else like /opt or /usr/loca
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 09:33:02AM -0300, Ashley George wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am running Debian unstable. Is it possible to install the KDE 3
> packages mentioned in recent postings side by side with Debian's 2.2
> packages?
Multiple versions of KDE can not be installed into the same hierarchy
>
> Hi,
>
> I am running Debian unstable. Is it possible to install the KDE 3
> packages mentioned in recent postings side by side with Debian's 2.2
> packages?
>
> I noticed the instructions on calc.cx/kde.txt say that if you use APT,
> you must remove the KDE2 packages first. Does that mean
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 1:17 pm, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 12:56:15AM +0100, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> -snip-
>
> > I don't understand. What has gcc 3.0.1 to do with it. It's not even in
> > unstable and I have been running it for years now. In fact, this one
> > right here is
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 12:56:15AM +0100, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
-snip-
> I don't understand. What has gcc 3.0.1 to do with it. It's not even in
> unstable and I have been running it for years now. In fact, this one right
> here is 3.0.2 compiled with
The original post was a typo, it was supp
On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 12:34:53PM +0200, Felix Homann wrote:
> I can't find kuickshow in the debs provided at geniussystems. Is it
> just not packaged or where can I find it?
Use gqview instead. :)
--
mfg, Jens Benecke /// http://www.linuxfaq.de, http://www.linux.ms
This mail is an attachment
* Paul Cupis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020720 13:51]:
> On Friday 19 July 2002 19:33, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
>
> > Are there any reasons why 3.0.2 is
> > not available? I notice it comes with handy ./debian directories
> > containing all the build info.
>
> KDE 3.0.2 debs *are* available. http://calc.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 19 July 2002 19:33, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> Are there any reasons why 3.0.2 is
> not available? I notice it comes with handy ./debian directories
> containing all the build info.
KDE 3.0.2 debs *are* available. http://calc.cx/kde.txt
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 19 July 2002 19:24, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> > Quoting the current topic for #debian-kde, it will go into sid when woody
> > is released.
>
> Is there a real dependency or is it just because other things are very
> time consuming until wood
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 20 July 2002 11:34 am, Felix Homann wrote:
> I can't find kuickshow in the debs provided at geniussystems. Is it just
> not packaged or where can I find it?
>
> Thanks,
> Felix
IIRC kuickshow is linked against imlib and as im
On Saturday, 20. July 2002 01:56, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> On Friday 19 July 2002 7:40 pm, Derek Gladding wrote:
> > On Friday 19 July 2002 11:33 am, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> > > On Friday 19 July 2002 5:52 pm, Paul Cupis wrote:
> > > > On Friday 19 July 2002 17:04, Joseph W. Schlecht wrote:
> > > >
On Friday 19 July 2002 7:40 pm, Derek Gladding wrote:
> On Friday 19 July 2002 11:33 am, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> > On Friday 19 July 2002 5:52 pm, Paul Cupis wrote:
> > > On Friday 19 July 2002 17:04, Joseph W. Schlecht wrote:
> > > > How about another update regarding when we might see KDE3
> > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 19 Jul 2002 7:40 pm, Derek Gladding wrote:
> It's in the list archives - iirc, Debian will be changing to gcc 3.0.1
> after woody, and KDE3 will be entering sid at this point.
Do you not mean 3.1? 3.0.1 wont even compile KDE if i remember co
* Paul Cupis schrieb am 19.07.02 um 18:52 Uhr:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 19 July 2002 17:04, Joseph W. Schlecht wrote:
> > How about another update regarding when we might see KDE3 packages go
> > into sid?
>
> Quoting the current topic for #debian-kde, it wi
On Friday 19 July 2002 11:33 am, Nicolai P Guba wrote:
> On Friday 19 July 2002 5:52 pm, Paul Cupis wrote:
> > On Friday 19 July 2002 17:04, Joseph W. Schlecht wrote:
> > > How about another update regarding when we might see KDE3
> > > packages go into sid?
> >
> > Quoting the current topic for #d
On Friday 19 July 2002 5:52 pm, Paul Cupis wrote:
> On Friday 19 July 2002 17:04, Joseph W. Schlecht wrote:
> > How about another update regarding when we might see KDE3 packages go
> > into sid?
>
> Quoting the current topic for #debian-kde, it will go into sid when woody
> is released.
Darn. On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 19 July 2002 17:04, Joseph W. Schlecht wrote:
> How about another update regarding when we might see KDE3 packages go
> into sid?
Quoting the current topic for #debian-kde, it will go into sid when woody is
released.
Paul Cupis
- --
[EMAI
On Saturday 06 July 2002 15:54, Cloverm wrote:
> This might have been asked before, but is there a way of making KDE3 and
> wine like each other? Have KDE3 installed but wine wouldn't install
> because of dependency problems.
Wine needs libarts, kde3 needs libarts1 (you might have noticed this).
T
> You're right. I tried 'artsdsp mozilla' and it worked.
Ok, then you might also want to run "dpkg-reconfigure mozilla-browser" (or
-snapshot or whatever your package name was). It should ask you what sound
output to use; choose "artsdsp" and you shouldn't have to run mozilla
manually through a
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
