On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 02:21:57AM -0500, Donald Spoon wrote:
> Warning: The imlib2 package was still missing from SID as of this
> afternoon. This will cause NEW installs of KDE 3.1.1 to fail until
> corrected.
And it will stay gone... A couple days after I uploaded kdegraphics the
imlib auth
Donald Spoon wrote:
I tried upgrading to KDE 3.1.1 in SID today (28 May 2003) by using the
metapackage "kde", and it failed. The kdegraphics dependency couldn't
be met. The kdegraphics fails because the kuickshow dependency couldn't
be met, and the kuickshow fails to install because the imlib2
I tried upgrading to KDE 3.1.1 in SID today (28 May 2003) by using the
metapackage "kde", and it failed. The kdegraphics dependency couldn't
be met. The kdegraphics fails because the kuickshow dependency couldn't
be met, and the kuickshow fails to install because the imlib2 dependency
couldn'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 Mar 2003 11:28, Ben Burton wrote:
> > ... and the
> > prospect of a simple kde metapackage for easy installation for
> > newbies seems a farfetched dream.
>
> I'll adopt meta-kde if Chris isn't ta
> ... and the
> prospect of a simple kde metapackage for easy installation for newbies seems
> a farfetched dream.
I'll adopt meta-kde if Chris isn't taking it (it's currently orphaned,
though there's no wnpp bug AFAICT). If I don't hear otherwise in a fe
--- Simon Hepburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 21 Feb 2002 7:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > metapackage will be the last thing I fix since it depends on every other
> > > package.
> >
> > OK. So, approximately when (# days) do y
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 23:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks for your quick reply! :)
> I've got a couple questions:
> > I will hopefully upload a new kdebase tomorrow (about 12hrs from now).
> > They have new packages in them so have to be manually overridden before
> > they can go
On Thursday 21 Feb 2002 7:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > metapackage will be the last thing I fix since it depends on every other
> > package.
>
> OK. So, approximately when (# days) do you think that might be done?
You are either very enthusias
ving this problem?
>
> see above
>
> > If not - when (in # of days) do you think Sid systems will be able to
> install
> > metapackage "kde"?
>
> metapackage will be the last thing I fix since it depends on every other
> package.
OK. So, approximatel
gt; If so - any idea why my Sid is still having this problem?
see above
> If not - when (in # of days) do you think Sid systems will be able to install
> metapackage "kde"?
metapackage will be the last thing I fix since it depends on every other
package.
I will hopefully upload a ne
--- Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:28:40AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> > I'm willing to do an NMU if there really is a dpendency problem (and Chris
> > doesn't object) but is there really a problem?
> >
> > I have libglib1.3-12 installed and I was also abl
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 03:21:04AM -0800, ben wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 February 2002 01:16 am, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > While I appreciate your support, sometimes I think you overplay the
> > maintainers' stocks a little bit. :)
> >
> > When we take on a package, we take on the responsibility of mai
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 01:16 am, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 12:27:25AM -0800, ben wrote:
> > just give it up. redeem yourself (if, indeed, you have any intent to do
> > so) by conceding that the only necessary obligation--in this case, of
> > gratitude and respect owed by
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 12:27:25AM -0800, ben wrote:
> just give it up. redeem yourself (if, indeed, you have any intent to do so)
> by conceding that the only necessary obligation--in this case, of gratitude
> and respect owed by the benficiaries of the unpaid labor of others--exists on
> the s
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 10:30 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snipped, due to sheer irrelevance]
for someone allegedly so concerned with detail and precision, neither your
repost nor the archive link which you allege provides evidence of having
included a quote of my post, actually, do that.
Since when have maintainers been allowed to have a social life? :-)
Seriously...thanks for all the great work guys. I am very dependent on, and
happy with the packages you provide, and I know several friends not anywhere
near an official Debian list that are in the same position.
Brian
On Mon
The first sentence in my previous message should have been:
I have read your message (below).
not
> I have ready your message (below).
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
Hi ben,
I have ready your message (below).
I am sending you this note because, based on your very last comment below, I am
concerned that somewhere along the communication channel part of the message I
sent to you did not get to you. (See below.)
--- ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesda
On Tuesday 19 Feb 2002 12:43 pm, ben wrote:
> without the effort of the maintainers, debian
> itself wouldn't exist, and i believe their consistent contribution to its
> existence deserves every expression of support we, as beficiaries, can take
> the time to make.
>
> ben
Agreed. Thanks for doin
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 04:23 am, Simon Hepburn wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 Feb 2002 11:01 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi ben,
>
>
>
> Hi ben indeed. I see nothing in this post that concerns debian-kde. Could
> you please continue this off-list. I do not want personal messages from you
> to be
On Tuesday 19 Feb 2002 12:25 pm, Daniel Stone wrote:
> It would be a very boring day when all Debian lists were on-topic.
Too True, but there is a difference between personal and off-topic. OT is
often entertaining and welcome. Personal is usually 90% mindless crap and not
welcome.
Simon Hepbu
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi ben,
>
> I read your message with some interest. In order to help me give you a
> response on par with your interest, will you please provide me some
> clarification about some things that are ambiguous to me about your
> message? TI
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 12:23:17PM +, Simon Hepburn wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 Feb 2002 11:01 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi ben,
>
>
>
> Hi ben indeed. I see nothing in this post that concerns debian-kde. Could you
> please continue this off-list. I do not want personal messages from you
On Tuesday 19 Feb 2002 11:01 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi ben,
Hi ben indeed. I see nothing in this post that concerns debian-kde. Could you
please continue this off-list. I do not want personal messages from you to
ben in my inbox.
Perhaps you could identify yourself before making any f
On Tuesday 19 February 2002 03:01 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi ben,
>
> I read your message with some interest. In order to help me give you a
> response on par with your interest, will you please provide me some
> clarification about some things that are ambiguous to me about your
> message?
Hi ben,
I read your message with some interest. In order to help me give you a
response on par with your interest, will you please provide me some
clarification about some things that are ambiguous to me about your message?
TIA.
1st: One ambiguity in your message is whether your message is (pl
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:28:40AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> I'm willing to do an NMU if there really is a dpendency problem (and Chris
> doesn't object) but is there really a problem?
>
> I have libglib1.3-12 installed and I was also able to install the kde
> package without any dependency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 18 February 2002 09:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ccheney is MIA for > 1 week with no advance notice of planned
[...]
> 6) Find another maintainer who can fix the metapackage, etc.
Just as Ben, Derek and Daniel, I'm really getting annoyed
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:28:40AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> I'm willing to do an NMU if there really is a dpendency problem (and Chris
> doesn't object) but is there really a problem?
>
> I have libglib1.3-12 installed and I was also able to install the kde
> package without any dependency
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok
> ccheney is MIA for > 1 week with no advance notice of planned absence
> kde metapackage in Sid doesn't install
> fails on libkmid - libkmid: Depends: libglib1.3-12 (>= 1.3.12)
> fails on libglib1.3-12 (>= 1.3.1
On Monday 18 February 2002 12:43 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> What's best quick fix for broken kde metapackage?
> What's the best long term fix for this?
> Do we need someone to do an NMU of the kde metapackage?
>
> There are quick fixes, and long term
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2002 05:02 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Ok, since I can't get the 'kde' metapackage in Sid to install, I did a
> apt-cache show kde(I think)
> and saw a bunch of depends and suggests.
>
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 02:00:04AM -0800, Derek Gladding wrote:
> On Monday 18 February 2002 01:36 am, ben wrote:
> > On Monday 18 February 2002 12:43 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Ok
> > > ccheney is MIA for > 1 week with no advance notice of planned
> > > absence
> >
> > [stuff]
>
> Seconde
On Monday 18 February 2002 01:36 am, ben wrote:
> On Monday 18 February 2002 12:43 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Ok
> > ccheney is MIA for > 1 week with no advance notice of planned
> > absence
>
> it's great that you've taken such an interest in helping the
> maintainers but you seem to have de
On Monday 18 February 2002 12:43 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok
> ccheney is MIA for > 1 week with no advance notice of planned absence
it's great that you've taken such an interest in helping the maintainers but
you seem to have developed an attitude of scorn that really seems
unjustified. e
Ok
ccheney is MIA for > 1 week with no advance notice of planned absence
kde metapackage in Sid doesn't install
fails on libkmid - libkmid: Depends: libglib1.3-12 (>= 1.3.12)
fails on libglib1.3-12 (>= 1.3.12) is not available
fails on kdebase-audiolibs
fails on libkmid o
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 08:02:26PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> something?) I didn't see anything about https or ssh. How do I get that https
> support installed?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l | grep crypto
ii kdelibs3-crypt 2.2.2-5KDE core crypto libraries
--
Brian Bilbrey
Ok, since I can't get the 'kde' metapackage in Sid to install, I did a
apt-cache show kde (I think)
and saw a bunch of depends and suggests.
So, to get as much of the functionality of the 'kde' package as is possible,
should I just go through and install by hand a
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 11:02:27PM -0800, tluxt wrote:
> Thanks for your info below. (See a few questions there.)
> You missed this question at the very beginning of the message, :)
> which refers to the subject of this message:
>
> Subject: What is keeping 'kde' meta
Thanks for your info below. (See a few questions there.)
You missed this question at the very beginning of the message, :)
which refers to the subject of this message:
Subject: What is keeping 'kde' metapackage out of Woody?
Q: And, where exactly in the Debian package system databas
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 01:23:13AM -0800, tluxt wrote:
-snip-
> Um, ok, but why are there these two different pages?
> These make it seem like there is both a package "kde", and
> a package "meta-kde" that are different packages.
> Do these two different URL, referring to both "package kde"
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 4. Februar 2002 10:23 schrieb tluxt:
> If you, when do you think you'll have all that work done?
>
> alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
>
> Seriously: Is it _worth_ doing all that effort?
IMHO yes.
>
--- Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 03:32:24PM -0800, tluxt wrote:
> > 1) What is package kde? I've heard of kde-base, and the 'kde'
> > metapackage, but not a 'regular' package called 'kde'.
> > 2)
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 03:32:24PM -0800, tluxt wrote:
> 1) What is package kde? I've heard of kde-base, and the 'kde'
> metapackage, but not a 'regular' package called 'kde'.
> 2) Is a bug of level 'important' able to keep a package out
sage is
received.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Last modified: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 22:14:22 UTC
=========
1) What is package kde? I've heard of kde-base, and the 'kde'
metapackage,
after my previous, erroneous, message to the list, i did install the kde
metapackage, with the same results you did. after the first failure, i did
an apt-get -f install, allowed it to "remove" the as yet-uninstalled
packages, configure and install the ones it could. then, i did anoth
On Tuesday 06 November 2001 02:09 am, Donald R. Spoon wrote:
> Bob Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > after my previous, erroneous, message to the list, i did install the kde
> > metapackage, with the same results you did. after the first failure, i
> > did an
Bob Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> after my previous, erroneous, message to the list, i did install the kde
> metapackage, with the same results you did. after the first failure, i did
> an apt-get -f install, allowed it to "remove" the as yet-uninstalled
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Kde metapackage
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 16:46:16 -0500
From: Bob Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Monday 05 November 2001 03:18 pm, John Gay wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Precedence: list
> Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Laurent Rathle wrote:
Hello,
Did anyone tried to install KDE with the metapackage kde ? I'm trying to
write a little tutorial for the installation of KDE 2.2.x and when I
installed it on my machine there was no kde metapackage and I took everything
from unstable package by package. So I&#
On Monday, 5. November 2001 18:47, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> > There are a couple things missing in the kde metapackage that I use (like
> > kmail). I did notice it appears in one of the other kde metapackages, so
> > i did an apt-get -t unstable install kde kde-extras -
ge kde ? I'm trying
> > > to write a little tutorial for the installation of KDE 2.2.x and when I
> > > installed it on my machine there was no kde metapackage and I took
> > > everything from unstable package by package. So I'd like to know if I
> > > p
hen I
installed it on my machine there was no kde metapackage and I took
everything from unstable package by package. So I'd like to know if I put
in my tutorial that people can do :
apt-get -t unstable install kde
After several attempts to upgrade to KDE2.2.1 using apt-get install
kde/unstable, I
allation of KDE 2.2.x and when I
> > installed it on my machine there was no kde metapackage and I took
> > everything from unstable package by package. So I'd like to know if I put
> > in my tutorial that people can do :
> >
> > apt-get -t unstable install kde
> >
> &
On Monday 05 November 2001 12:13, Laurent Rathle wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Did anyone tried to install KDE with the metapackage kde ? I'm trying to
> write a little tutorial for the installation of KDE 2.2.x and when I
> installed it on my machine there was no kde metapackage and
Hello,
Did anyone tried to install KDE with the metapackage kde ? I'm trying to
write a little tutorial for the installation of KDE 2.2.x and when I
installed it on my machine there was no kde metapackage and I took everything
from unstable package by package. So I'd like to know i
56 matches
Mail list logo
