On Monday, July 25, 2016 5:22:08 PM CEST Sandro Knauß wrote:
> Hey,
>
> no the sender client is wrong.
> multipart/alternative is defined as the mail client should select ONLY one
> part of the alternatives and ignore every other part, if one is selected.
> See https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc1341
On Monday, July 25, 2016 12:06:05 PM CEST Tim Ruehsen wrote:
> Right-click on a message with a bunch of attachments and selecting "Save
> attachments" results in "Found no attachments to save".
>
> The same goes when using the context menu within the messa
Just a small thing (but still sometimes annoying when sending many attachments
to a non-technical customer).
When selecting a range of files as attachments (e.g. 1.txt, 2.txt, 3.txt), they
appear in the attachment list in the reverse order (3.txt on top, 1.txt at
bottom). One can work around
Right-click on a message with a bunch of attachments and selecting "Save
attachments" results in "Found no attachments to save".
The same goes when using the context menu within the message itself.
But the "Message structure" window shows me each attachment. And r
On 4 August 2010 12:30, Cassiano Leal wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The subject says it all: is it possible for Kmail to decode those
> damned winmail.dat attachments that Outlook uses? I read somewhere
> that it was supposed to do it automatically, but it is not working
> here.
>
&g
Hi!
The subject says it all: is it possible for Kmail to decode those
damned winmail.dat attachments that Outlook uses? I read somewhere
that it was supposed to do it automatically, but it is not working
here.
I have a private IMAP server where Outlook dumps all received mail so
that I can read
El miércoles, 25 de octubre de 2006 07:48, Greg Madden escribió:
> Sorry for the rant . I am using the latest kmail/kontact Etch, 1.9.5,
> KDE 3.5.5, updated a couple of days ago, kdelibs updated today. If I
> click on an attachment for a filtered/archived email I get /tmp... does
> not exist. If I
ot exist. If I do a save as I can go to the saved location and it
> works. No lost data but not an optimal solution.
>
> Addendum it doesn't happen on all filtered emails ?? Just the most
> important one :-)
>
> Addendum 2, now it works like it is supposed to. Sorry for the n
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 07:22:49 +0200
Jan De Luyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 October 2006 03:21, Greg Madden wrote:
> > I just discovered that kmail stores attachments in /tmp/kde-user/..
> > I filter my clients mails to the appropriate client folder but the
&
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 03:21, Greg Madden wrote:
> I just discovered that kmail stores attachments in /tmp/kde-user/.. I
> filter my clients mails to the appropriate client folder but the
> attachment goes to /tmp. I a guessing here but if I reboot my box /tmp
> is empt
I just discovered that kmail stores attachments in /tmp/kde-user/.. I
filter my clients mails to the appropriate client folder but the
attachment goes to /tmp. I a guessing here but if I reboot my box /tmp
is emptied, no more attachments. This is completely unacceptable to have
attachments in /tmp
> Although it would be nice to get others to do the dirty work, it's not the
> way it works ... mostly. Filing bugreports is the only reliable way to
> reach most of KDE developers.
Yes, definitely. 'Volunteers?' was meant to be a little bit sarcastic. I did
not expect someone to shout 'here!'.
Tim Ruehsen wrote:
> I hate to file a bug to bugs.kde.org. They like to entangle one into
> endless discussions... volunteers?
Although it would be nice to get others to do the dirty work, it's not the
way it works ... mostly. Filing bugreports is the only reliable way to
reach most of KDE devel
Tim Ruehsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just updated to KDE 3.5 / KMail 1.9.1. When selecting 'save
> attachments' on a mail with 2 or more attachments, a directory
> selector/requester pop's up. It asks me for a directory to save the
> files into. BUT:
>
> * I can&#
> Ah, now I think I understand your situation. I'm curious what happens when
> you want to save 1.vox, 2.vox and 3.vox to a directory that already
> contains 2.vox. Does it automatically overwrite? If so, that's bad. I'd
> file a minor bug against that. Or does it pop up a dialog asking wha
he files that
> > you're saving?
>
> I was not talking about the files to save but about the files that are
> already in the directory which I want to save the new files into. E.g. I
> have attachments 1.vox 2.vox 3.vox and want to save it into directory X.
> Before KDE 3.5/K
On Monday 23 January 2006 10:17, Derek Broughton wrote:
[snip]
> OK, so you're not the person who presumably chose to use this widget in
> the first place,
You're right, that wasn't my decision. And my opinions below represent what
I _think_ the thought process is, not necessarily that I agree w
Justin Guerin wrote:
> On Monday 23 January 2006 04:36, Tim Ruehsen wrote:
>
>> * I can't see any files in the selected directory. This cuts me off from:
>> - a quick view into the directory (my decision to create a new
>> directory might be based on the contents).
>> - removing/renaming sing
t the files that are already
in the directory which I want to save the new files into. E.g. I have
attachments 1.vox 2.vox 3.vox and want to save it into directory X. Before
KDE 3.5/Kmail 1.9.1 I got this 'file selector' widget, where I could see the
already existing files. In this
On Monday 23 January 2006 04:36, Tim Ruehsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just updated to KDE 3.5 / KMail 1.9.1. When selecting 'save
> attachments' on a mail with 2 or more attachments, a directory
> selector/requester pop's up. It asks me for a directory to save the files
>
Hi,
I just updated to KDE 3.5 / KMail 1.9.1. When selecting 'save attachments' on
a mail with 2 or more attachments, a directory selector/requester pop's up.
It asks me for a directory to save the files into. BUT:
* I can't access my bookmarked directories. This makes the p
This message is automatically generated by the Casino Support messaging system.
As an increased security measure and a further protection against viruses, the
Casino Support team no longer accepts emails containing attachments. You may
still send us text only emails - without attachments - to
Previous attempts to post this message with an attached screen-shot have been
rejected by the list server.
KMail does not show the status bar. This condition has persisted since
upgrading to 3.2.x. I'd rather not trash my .kderc folder. Help?
--
Comments are appreciated,
Bob
On Saturday 10 of January 2004 18:17, Anders Andersen wrote:
> Windows virus spam never has your email address in the actual
> to: header field, but real people sending you attachments
> almost always have. So you simply download all "real mail" and
> nuke everything else.
On Sunday 11 January 2004 02:14, Thomas Ritter wrote:
> On Sunday 11 January 2004 01:58, Antiphon wrote:
> > I don't use POP. Plus, the KMail POP3 filters require confirmation. Very
> > annoying if you leave your machine to autocheck.
>
> yapp. but really, better use spamassassin and clamscan.pl. B
On Sunday 11 January 2004 01:58, Antiphon wrote:
> I don't use POP. Plus, the KMail POP3 filters require confirmation. Very
> annoying if you leave your machine to autocheck.
No they don't? Just set it to download automatically/delete on server for the
appropriate filter, and kmail will just do w
On Sunday 11 January 2004 01:58, Antiphon wrote:
> I don't use POP. Plus, the KMail POP3 filters require confirmation. Very
> annoying if you leave your machine to autocheck.
yapp. but really, better use spamassassin and clamscan.pl. Both together get
more than 99% of my spam (and clamav writes,
e latest CVS so can someone tell me if KMail has the
> > ability to filter attachments? As of 1.5.4, KMail doesn't have this
> > functionality It really ought to. I'm sick of Windows viruses clogging up
> > my inbox.
>
> This particular nuisance is in fact easy t
On Saturday 10 January 2004 21:00, Antiphon wrote:
> I'm not running the latest CVS so can someone tell me if KMail has the
> ability to filter attachments? As of 1.5.4, KMail doesn't have this
> functionality It really ought to. I'm sick of Windows viruses clogg
On Saturday 10 of January 2004 15:00, Antiphon wrote:
> I'm not running the latest CVS so can someone tell me if KMail
> has the ability to filter attachments? As of 1.5.4, KMail
> doesn't have this functionality It really ought to. I'm sick of
> Windows viruses clo
I'm not running the latest CVS so can someone tell me if KMail has the ability
to filter attachments? As of 1.5.4, KMail doesn't have this functionality It
really ought to. I'm sick of Windows viruses clogging up my inbox.
I'll open a feature request if upstream hasn't added this.
rs may find more useful.
I think I'll just use Mutt to remove the attachments, since it does
leave the Mime Description and filename in the mail message, so I can
find it later.
jc
--
Jeff CoppockSystems Engineer
Diggin' Debian Admin and User
Riku Voipio, 2003-Dec-03 12:35 +0200:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 06:19:28PM +1100, jedd wrote:
> > I've wanted this feature for a while, too, and checked to see
> > if someone had already filed a wishlist for it - bug # 33219
> > was opened in 2001, and was closed without any explanatory
> > com
Am Mittwoch, 3. Dezember 2003 11:13 schrieb Anders Ellenshøj Andersen:
> On Wednesday 03 December 2003 08:19, jedd wrote:
> > ] 1. Move the mail in question to the outbox folder
> > ] 2. Now you can edit this mail and remove the attachment.
> > ] 3. Save it again, but dont sent it.
> > ] 4. Mov
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 06:19:28PM +1100, jedd wrote:
> I've wanted this feature for a while, too, and checked to see
> if someone had already filed a wishlist for it - bug # 33219
> was opened in 2001, and was closed without any explanatory
> comments.
> I can't find any other similar wishli
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 08:19, jedd wrote:
> ] 1. Move the mail in question to the outbox folder
> ] 2. Now you can edit this mail and remove the attachment.
> ] 3. Save it again, but dont sent it.
> ] 4. Move it back to the orignal folder
>
> Hey, that's a neat way of doing it! The onl
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 22:32, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 December 2003 19:02, Jeff wrote:
> > I can't seem to figure out how to delete an attachment from an email
> > message. If I save the attachment to my local filesystem, but I want
> > to keep the message in my email
On Wed December 3 2003 06:03 pm, Hartmut Manz wrote:
] 1. Move the mail in question to the outbox folder
] 2. Now you can edit this mail and remove the attachment.
] 3. Save it again, but dont sent it.
] 4. Move it back to the orignal folder
Hey, that's a neat way of doing it! The only thing
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 19:02, Jeff wrote:
> I can't seem to figure out how to delete an attachment from an email
> message. If I save the attachment to my local filesystem, but I want
> to keep the message in my email folder, I want to minimize the size of
> the folder by removing the attachm
I can't seem to figure out how to delete an attachment from an email
message. If I save the attachment to my local filesystem, but I want
to keep the message in my email folder, I want to minimize the size of
the folder by removing the attachment(s).
thanks,
jc
--
Jeff CoppockSyst
Hi, Ricardo!
On Thursday 10 April 2003 21:04, Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 07:30:20PM +0200, Mika Fischer wrote:
> > I guess you mean: that kmail puts the CRs in for signing is good,
> > but that it removes them again before sending is not :)
>
> Mmh... Now that
Hi, David!
On Thursday 10 April 2003 21:30, David Pye wrote:
> I wonder if this is what happens:
>
> I *know* in transit some of the CRs may get turned into CRLFs (Can't
> confirm when tho!) and therefore KMail assumes that this is certain
> to happen, and therefore signs the message with them in
I wonder if this is what happens:
I *know* in transit some of the CRs may get turned into CRLFs (Can't confirm
when tho!) and therefore KMail assumes that this is certain to happen, and
therefore signs the message with them in to ensure that things will match ok?
David
On Thursday 10 April 200
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 07:30:20PM +0200, Mika Fischer wrote:
>
> I guess you mean: that kmail puts the CRs in for signing is good, but
> that it removes them again before sending is not :)
Mmh... Now that you say it, I should review it a bit. Probably Python's
SMTP module is CR'cing the message
Hi, Ricardo!
On Thursday 10 April 2003 11:12, Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina wrote:
> > I just can't think of a reason why kmail would put them in there
> > (only in the signed part) then sign the message and then remov them
> > again befor sending the mail out :)
> > It just doesn't make any sens
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Mika Fischer wrote:
> Hi, David!
>
> On Thursday 10 April 2003 01:29, David Pye wrote:
> > I [resume you're aware the ^M characters are actually DOS/Windows
> > carriage returns? ie CRLF, rather than the unix convention of just
> > LF..
>
> Yes, I know
Hmm...
I [resume you're aware the ^M characters are actually DOS/Windows carriage
returns? ie CRLF, rather than the unix convention of just LF..
David
'On Wednesday 09 April 2003 23:01, Mika Fischer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> [Keeping this on the list because it has something to do with kmail :)]
>
> S
Hi, David!
On Thursday 10 April 2003 01:29, David Pye wrote:
> I [resume you're aware the ^M characters are actually DOS/Windows
> carriage returns? ie CRLF, rather than the unix convention of just
> LF..
Yes, I know :)
I just can't think of a reason why kmail would put them in there (only
in
Hi!
Small addition...
On Thursday 10 April 2003 00:01, Mika Fischer wrote:
> 1. The behaviour is different between using the MTA via SMTP or via
> /usr/lib/sendmail.
This is wrong. The behaviour is actually the same.
> 3. As if this was not strange enough... here it comes :)
> If I send the mai
Hi!
[Keeping this on the list because it has something to do with kmail :)]
So back to my probblem from the "kmail & cryptplug anyone?" thread...
I ran several tests and this is what I found out:
1. The behaviour is different between using the MTA via SMTP or via
/usr/lib/sendmail. I couldn't
On Sunday 05 May 2002 12:59 pm, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Sonntag, 5. Mai 2002 21:57 schrieb ben:
> > i'm running kmail 1.3.2 under kde 2.2.2. is it possible to set up an
> > association so that incoming .doc atta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 5. Mai 2002 21:57 schrieb ben:
> i'm running kmail 1.3.2 under kde 2.2.2. is it possible to set up an
> association so that incoming .doc attachments can automatically run
> openoffice?
You do not assign to the ending .doc
i'm running kmail 1.3.2 under kde 2.2.2. is it possible to set up an
association so that incoming .doc attachments can automatically run
openoffice?
ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 17. Oktober 2001 19:25 schrieb Shawn P. Garbett:
> Yesterday I could right click on an attachment and it would give me a nice
> pop up menu. Today that's gone, it only has Open URL and Copy to Clipboard.
> This is frustrating, what happene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yesterday I could right click on an attachment and it would give me a nice
pop up menu. Today that's gone, it only has Open URL and Copy to Clipboard.
This is frustrating, what happened to "Save As". This is the second time this
has disappeared. Bef
I installed debian potato an an other system, same kde packages, same
gui. There it works :(. So I'm afraid I have to redo some things on
my system also.
Hendrik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Monday 12 March 2001 10:30, Hendrik Naumann wrote something to this effect:
> Hi
>
> I installed all the kde_1.2-final packages for potato. The problem I
> have is that I can't open attachments. Instead "part://2" is showd in
> t
Hi
I installed all the kde_1.2-final packages for potato. The problem I
have is that I can't open attachments. Instead "part://2" is showd in
the left bottom.
When I start kmail from the shell kmail prompts
"kdecore (KProtocolManager): ERROR: Protocol part not found"
to
> > search the lists archive. Is there an archive? and where is it
> > located.
> >
> > I'm running SID, with KMail 1.2 (Using KDE 2.1 post Beat 2
> > (>=20010128)) and suddenly I find that I can not save attachments.
> > The only options that I
, with KMail 1.2 (Using KDE 2.1 post Beat 2
> (>=20010128)) and suddenly I find that I can not save attachments.
> The only options that I'm offered after right clicking on an
> attachment are:
> 1. OPEN URL
> 2. COPY TO CLIPBOARD
>
> Which is an oddity. Sinc
On Friday 16 February 2001 12:19, G. L. `Griz' Inabnit wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Hello Good People,
>
> I'm new to this mail-list (Thanks to Ivan!) and would like to search the
> lists archive. Is there an archive? and where is it located.
Go to http://www.debian.org O
nd
suddenly I find that I can not save attachments. The only options that I'm
offered after right clicking on an attachment are:
1. OPEN URL
2. COPY TO CLIPBOARD
Which is an oddity. Since my first use of KMail I've been delighted
with the
simplicity, directness, and power.
> I've got a problem with KMail. When I get a mail message with multiple
> attachments, KMail only shows the first attachment. Any ideas?
fyi...I know there was some mention of fixes for attachments in kmail
recently...check the new beta packages once I get them uplo
Hello,
I've got a problem with KMail. When I get a mail message with multiple
attachments, KMail only shows the first attachment. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance
Dieter
64 matches
Mail list logo
